Racist Sharpton and Spike Lee at it again

[whiteathlete33]

Big Bad Al and the midget are now calling for a boycott of the NY Post. They say a cartoon likening Obama to a chimp was racist. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/18/new-york-post-chimp -carto_n_167841.html

 

[GiovaniMarcon]

Sure Al, sure Spike, because both of you are so relevant, right? The world won't turn until we have the two cents of a fat black geezer idiot and an untalented skinny black nerd midget safely tucked into our wallets.

 

[whiteathlete33]

The thing that bothers me about these two clowns Giovani is they have the power to ruin people's lives. For instance remember when Big Bad Al and his protesting got Don Imus fired. This is a man's career we are talking about. This fat pig Sharpton has some power with the black community and if he calls for a boycott of something, some people will listen.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Al "Sharlaton" & Jesse "HiJackson" are the 2 biggest race pimps/hustlers on the planet...bar none! They've ridden the "Saint MLK" gravy train (as have "YOseph" bLowery, "YOretta" Scott King, etc.). These 2 dirtbags are basically extortioners/scams artist and make there "living" off fleecing the White man.

BTW, the drawing is pretty dang clever!

 

[Average American]

Militant bigoted dunce, Spike Lee, tweets what he believed was the home address of George Zimmerman's innocent parents.. so morons could bother them. After weeks of receiving threats thru the mail, and drive-by stink-eyes, it turned out to be the address of a completely different innocent family.

Home value has dropped bcuz of the history of harassment & home-owner suffers heart attack from the stress.. They're now suing Lee for 'excess of 15K'.. Probably need a more aggressive lawyer, & isn't harassment/threatening over electronic media a crime in FL, not sure (??)

http://mynews13.com/content/news/cf...icles/cfn/2013/11/8/sanford_couple_sues_.html

 

[GiovaniMarcon]

Figuratively, Spike Lee is a GIGANTIC ******.

Literally, he is still a ******, but also a no-talent dwarf. Him and his hack movies can go eat Jewnuts.

 

[werewolf]

"harassment/threatening over electronic media a crime in FL, not sure (??)"


Of course they could make it a crime and charge him with terroristic threats, felonious harassment, stalking, hate crimes, incitement, etc etc. - and if the situation was reversed you bet they'd be all over the case.

 

[PHillisFan]

Altoona is allowed all this power because he is allowed. People should just throw the bush monkey mockery in his face and call it a day for if he is making so much noise about it then one can deduce that a part of him believes blacks are closer to monkeys.

 

[Charles Martel]

Altoona is allowed all this power because he is allowed. People should just throw the bush monkey mockery in his face and call it a day for if he is making so much noise about it then one can deduce that a part of him believes blacks are closer to monkeys.

All apes and monkeys are primates, but apes are not monkeys. Humans, gorillas, chimpanzees and orangutans are different types of apes, but are not monkeys.

Negroes are human (species homo sapiens), but in all honesty likely a more primitive sub-species of human (homo sapiens africanus).

On average, there is between 5 and 6 times as much difference between the DNA of a full-blooded negro and a person of Western European heritage, than there is between a Japanese person and a person of Western European heritage.

There is about 1.6% difference in the DNA of a bonobo chimpanzee and the DNA of a human, depending upon how it is measured.

Using the same method to measure DNA, there is about .140% difference in the DNA of a person from Western Europe and a full-blooded negro from Nigeria.

There is about .024% difference in the DNA of the average person from Western Europe and a Japanese.

There is about .004% difference in the DNA of the average person from the British Isles and the average Italian.

There is about .001% difference in the DNA of a person from the British Isles and a person from France or Germany.

There is on average less than .001% difference in the DNA of a Scotsman, Englishman or Irishman.

Negroes are part the same species as we are (they can interbreed with us and the offspring are fertile) but that .140% difference is actually a lot within a species (consider even a fruit fly shares 60% of it's DNA with humans and a house cat shares 90% of it's DNA with humans).

Being objective about it without either prejudice or "political correctness" the .140% DNA difference is definitely enough to consider negroes to be a different sub-species, but not enough to consider negroes to be a different species.

 

[PHillisFan]

All apes and monkeys are primates, but apes are not monkeys. Humans, gorillas, chimpanzees and orangutans are different types of apes, but are not not monkeys.

Negroes are human (species homo sapiens), but in all honesty likely a more primitive sub-species of human (homo sapiens africanus).

On average, there is between 5 and 6 times as much difference between the DNA of a full-blooded negro and a person of Western European heritage, than there is between a Japanese person and a person of Western European heritage.

There is about 1.6% difference in the DNA of a bonobo chimpanzee and the DNA of a human, depending upon how it is measured.

Using the same methoud to measure DNA, there is about .140% difference in the DNA of a person from Western Europe and a full-blooded negro from Nigeria.

There is about .024% difference in the DNA of the average person from Western Europe and a Japanese.

There is about .004% difference in the DNA of the average person from the British Isles and the average Italian.

There is about .001% difference in the DNA of a person from the British Isles and a person from France or Germany.

There is on average less than .001% difference in the DNA of a Scotsman, Englishman or Irishman.

Negroes are part the same species as we are (they can interbreed with us and the offspring are fertile) but that .140% difference is actually a lot within a species (consider even a fruit fly shares 60% of it's DNA with humans and a house cat shares 90% of it's DNA with humans).

Being objective about it without either prejudice or "political correctness" the .140% DNA difference is definitely enough to consider negroes to be a different sub-species, but not enough to consider negroes to be a different species.

Scientifically speaking, yes you are correct. It seems we are all tied to a common ancestor. There is an ebook called erectuswalksamong us that you can google. It places blacks as homo erectus and has a nice breakdown of the evidence . I also subscribe that they are a subspecies. In fact there was a study that neanderthal dna was found in all races except the ******* race. I found that very interesting.Sometimes i think they are on an entire different level far from everyone else. And everytime you hear we are all the same from someone different skin, forensic anthropology debunks that theory.

 

[Charles Martel]

In fact there was a study that neanderthal dna was found in all races except the ******* race.

The media made a big deal about Eurasians having 2% Neanderthal DNA, but barely mentioned the discovery a few years later that sub-Saharan negroes have about 8% homo erectus DNA.

Homo erectus was an entirely different species that evolved some 1,000,000 years ago, while homo sapiens neanderthalis was likely just another homo sapiens sub-species that appeared some 100,000 years ago.

 

[PHillisFan]

The media made a big deal about Eurasians having 2% Neanderthal DNA, but barely mentioned the discovery a few years later that sub-Saharan negroes have about 8% homo erectus DNA.

Homo erectus was an entirely different species that evolved some 1,000,000 years ago, while homo sapiens neanderthalis was likely just another homo sapiens sub-species that appeared some 100,000 years ago.

Just curious cacharias, what material have you studied on this? Specific authors? It seems like you are well informed on this subject.

 

[Charles Martel]

Just curious cacharias, what material have you studied on this? Specific authors? It seems like you are well informed on this subject.

I've just looked through material easily found on the internet, using microsoft bing to do the searches: www.bing.com

I thought the photo at 00:12 of this video summarizes it:

[video=youtube;6WC6upXgfbE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6WC6upXgfbE[/video]

 

[Carolina Speed]

All apes and monkeys are primates, but apes are not monkeys. Humans, gorillas, chimpanzees and orangutans are different types of apes, but are not monkeys.

Negroes are human (species homo sapiens), but in all honesty likely a more primitive sub-species of human (homo sapiens africanus).

On average, there is between 5 and 6 times as much difference between the DNA of a full-blooded negro and a person of Western European heritage, than there is between a Japanese person and a person of Western European heritage.

There is about 1.6% difference in the DNA of a bonobo chimpanzee and the DNA of a human, depending upon how it is measured.

Using the same method to measure DNA, there is about .140% difference in the DNA of a person from Western Europe and a full-blooded negro from Nigeria.

There is about .024% difference in the DNA of the average person from Western Europe and a Japanese.

There is about .004% difference in the DNA of the average person from the British Isles and the average Italian.

There is about .001% difference in the DNA of a person from the British Isles and a person from France or Germany.

There is on average less than .001% difference in the DNA of a Scotsman, Englishman or Irishman.

Negroes are part the same species as we are (they can interbreed with us and the offspring are fertile) but that .140% difference is actually a lot within a species (consider even a fruit fly shares 60% of it's DNA with humans and a house cat shares 90% of it's DNA with humans).

Being objective about it without either prejudice or "political correctness" the .140% DNA difference is definitely enough to consider negroes to be a different sub-species, but not enough to consider negroes to be a different species.

I disagree, Humans are not Apes!