More Nonsense from scientists

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
This is just complete and utter bull. Just like in the early 80's when they predicted people will be living on the moon by now.

<div ="hd">



<h1 id="yn-title">Who wants to live forever? Scientist sees aging cured</h1>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/reuters/brand/SIG=pd7i95/*http://www.reuters.com" target="_blank">
d0c3eb8ca18907492a4b337b5cec5193.jpeg
</a>







<ul id="top" ="tools mod ult-section">[*]
<div ="yui3-widget yui3-ymsb" id="yui_3_1_1_7_130980971501735"><div id="yui_3_1_1_7_130980971501744" ="ymsb ymsb-facebook ymsb-retweet ymsb-mail ymsb-print yui3-ymsb-"><ul><li ="ymsb-module ymsb-facebook-module">
<li ="ymsb-module ymsb-retweet-module">
<li ="ymsb-module ymsb-mail-module">Email</span><li ="ymsb-module ymsb-print-module">Print</span>[/list]</div></div>
[/list]






</div>








<div ="byline">
<cite ="vcard">
By Health and Science Correspondent Kate Kelland
</cite>
â€"
<abbr title="2011-07-04T11:39:27-0700" ="recenttimedate">1hr22minsago</abbr>
</div>


<div ="yn-story-">


LONDON (Reuters) â€" If Aubrey de Grey's predictions
are right, the first person who will live to see their 150th birthday
has already been born. And the first person to live for 1,000 years
could be less than 20 years younger.




A biomedical gerontologist and chief scientist of a foundation dedicated
to longevity research, de Grey reckons that within his own lifetime
doctors could have all the tools they need to "cure" aging -- banishing
diseases that come with it and extending life indefinitely.




"I'd say we have a 50/50 chance of bringing aging under what I'd call a
decisive level of medical control within the next 25 years or so," de
Grey said in an interview before delivering a lecture at Britain's Royal
Institution academy of science.




"And what I mean by decisive is the same sort of medical control that we have over most infectious diseases today."




De Grey sees a time when people will go to their doctors for regular
"maintenance," which by then will include gene therapies, stem cell
therapies, immune stimulation and a range of other advanced medical
techniques to keep them in good shape.




De Grey lives near Cambridge University where he won his doctorate in
2000 and is chief scientific officer of the non-profit California-based
SENS (Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence) Foundation, which
he co-founded in 2009.




He describes aging as the lifelong accumulation of various types of molecular and cellular damage throughout the body.




"The idea is to engage in what you might call preventative geriatrics,
where you go in to periodically repair that molecular and cellular
damage before it gets to the level of abundance that is pathogenic," he
explained.




CHALLENGE




Exactly how far and how fast life expectancy will increase in the future
is a subject of some debate, but the trend is clear. An average of
three months is being added to life expectancy every year at the moment
and experts estimate there could be a million centenarians across the
world by 2030.




To date, the world's longest-living person on record lived to 122 and in
Japan alone there were more than 44,000 centenarians in 2010.




Some researchers say, however, that the trend toward longer lifespan may
falter due to an epidemic of obesity now spilling over from rich
nations into the developing world.




De Grey's ideas may seem far-fetched, but $20,000 offered in 2005 by the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Technology Review journal
for any molecular biologist who showed that de Grey's SENS theory was
"so wrong that it was unworthy of learned debate" was never won.




The judges on that panel were prompted into action by an angry put-down
of de Grey from a group of nine leading scientists who dismissed his
work as "pseudo science."




They concluded that this label was not fair, arguing instead that SENS
"exists in a middle ground of yet-to-be-tested ideas that some people
may find intriguing but which others are free to doubt."




CELL THERAPY




For some, the prospect of living for hundreds of years is not
particularly attractive, either, as it conjures up an image of
generations of sick, weak old people and societies increasingly less
able to cope.




But de Grey says that's not what he's working for. Keeping the killer diseases of old age at bay is the primary focus.




"This is absolutely not a matter of keeping people alive in a bad state
of health," he told Reuters. "This is about preventing people from
getting sick as a result of old age. The particular therapies that we
are working on will only deliver long life as a side effect of
delivering better health."




De Grey divides the damage caused by aging into seven main categories
for which repair techniques need to be developed if his prediction for
continual maintenance is to come true.




He notes that while for some categories, the science is still in its
earliest stages, there are others where it's already almost there.




"Stem cell therapy is a big part of this. It's designed to reverse one
type of damage, namely the loss of cells when cells die and are not
automatically replaced, and it's already in clinical trials (in
humans)," he said.




Stem cell therapies are currently being trialed in people with spinal
cord injuries, and de Grey and others say they may one day be used to
find ways to repair disease-damaged brains and hearts.




NO AGE LIMIT




Cardiovascular diseases are the world's biggest age-related killers and
de Grey says there is a long way to go on these though researchers have
figured out the path to follow.




Heart diseases that cause heart failure, heart attacks and strokes are
brought about by the accumulation of certain types of what de Grey calls
"molecular garbage" -- byproducts of the body's metabolic processes --
which our bodies are not able to break down or excrete.




"The garbage accumulates inside the cell, and eventually it gets in the way of the cell's workings," he said.




De Grey is working with colleagues in the United States to identify
enzymes in other species that can break down the garbage and clean out
the cells -- and the aim then is to devise genetic therapies to give
this capability to humans.




"If we could do that in the case of certain modified forms of
cholesterol which accumulate in cells of the artery wall, then we simply
would not get cardiovascular disease," he said.




De Grey is reluctant to make firm predictions about how long people will
be able to live in future, but he does say that with each major advance
in longevity, scientists will buy more time to make yet more scientific
progress.




In his view, this means that the first person who will live to 1,000 is
likely to be born less than 20 years after the first person to reach
150.




"I call it longevity escape velocity -- where we have a sufficiently
comprehensive panel of therapies to enable us to push back the ill
health of old age faster than time is passing. And that way, we buy
ourselves enough time to develop more therapies further as time goes
on," he said.




"What we can actually predict in terms of how long people will live is
absolutely nothing, because it will be determined by the risk of death
from other causes like accidents," he said.




"But there really shouldn't be any limit imposed by how long ago you
were born. The whole point of maintenance is that it works
indefinitely."

</div>
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,182
Location
Pennsylvania
whiteathlete33 said:
<DIV ="yn-story-">


LONDON (Reuters) â€" If Aubrey de Grey's predictions are right, the first person who will live to see their 150th birthday has already been born. And the first person to live for 1,000 years could be less than 20 years younger.


A biomedical gerontologist and chief scientist of a foundation dedicated to longevity research, de Grey reckons that within his own lifetime doctors could have all the tools they need to "cure" aging -- banishing diseases that come with it and extending life indefinitely.

Get back to us with a progress report when you finally cure the common cold.
 

mattharper

Guru
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
318
Its amazing what sceintists will say to get grants so the can drive their Beamers. I remember growing up scientists actually given money by the government to take a whole bunch of exspensive equipment and search for The Loch Ness Monster. Right. Im not saying all science is garbage but a lot of it is.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Good one, Don!
smiley36.gif
 
Top