yanling
Guru
Many boxing fans and sports writers continually refer to former world heavyweight champion Max Schmeling as a Nazi.
Do you agree?
Do you agree?
yanling said:JD1986 -- I definitely concur with that fact. The same thing was said about Gerry Cooney's spectacular humiliation of Ken Norton in less than one round in the early 1980s. "Oh, Ken's a shot fighter; this doesn't count. This isn't the same Ken who beat Ali, blah blah blah..."Yet no one harps so much about the fact that Muhammed Ali defeated Floyd Patterson when the latter was basically geriatric and several years beyond his prime. It is simply used as further evidence of Ali's greatness, as in "Ali crushes a formidable, former heavyweight champ, etc."Rocky Marciano is of course not taken seriously among liberal sportwriters when discussing the 'best of all time' because to them no white man could ever achieve a 49-0 record legitimately, or if he did it was only because his competition wasn't black enough. Thus his undefeated record is dismissed because Joe louis or Joe Walcott (who received the most devastating punch in the history of boxing from Marciano in their title bout) were older. Also, to discuss Marciano or anyone else as the greatest ever would not conform to the party line that Cassius Clay is the best ever.He might be, he might not be, but the point is, liberals like to leave the particulars of the debate to themselves, and don't want to include white fighters among their options of best ever.The fact is Marciano fought any man they put in front of him, white or black, and beat him half to death. He ducked no one.Jaxvid -- thanks for the link!