http://www.topix.com/forum/afam

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
I don't think as a general rule that we at Caste Football want any website banned, because the same thing could be unfairly done to us. Unless it's a child pornagraphy site or something similar, I usually don't support any banning or censorship.
 

Menelik

Mentor
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
1,175
Location
Georgia
guest301 said:
I don't think as a general rule that we at Caste Football want any website banned, because the same thing could be unfairly done to us. Unless it's a child pornagraphy site or something similar, I usually don't support any banning or censorship.

smiley32.gif
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
guest301 said:
I don't think as a general rule that we at Caste Football want any website banned, because the same thing could be unfairly done to us. Unless it's a child pornagraphy site or something similar, I usually don't support any banning or censorship.

Agreed...it's a slippery slope indeed. Once the Feds get a foothole/starting point (like the police state), the snowball effect can start thereafter.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
I also think that it's important for people to have a place to go online to freely express whatever thoughts they may have on things. I by no means like everything thats posted here but I wouldn't want the goverment to take anybody's right here to post it. The only people allowed to censor here is the owner and the moderators, it's none of the goverments business unless we were involved in some kind of illegal activity like the child porn I referenced above.
 

darthvader

Guru
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
148
I have never seen this site but if it is black racist site then hurray for them. As a white separatist I support black racism. It's only when they turn around and don't support white racism that I have a major problem with. At this point I want to meet the person or people who believe in dividing or separating this country along racial lines.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
darthvader said:
I have never seen this site but if it is black racist site then hurray for them. As a white separatist I support black racism. It's only when they turn around and don't support white racism that I have a major problem with. At this point I want to meet the person or people who believe in dividing or separating this country along racial lines.

The double-standard is ever present amongst the cultural Marxists indeed. I agree with the gist of your point(s) Vader. I don't (necessarily) mind "Black Pride", as long as we can equally embrace & trumpet "White Pride". It's the double-standard that is the issue.
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
DixieDestroyer said:
It's the double-standard that is the issue.

exactly.
 

waterbed

Mentor
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
871
Location
Outside North America
I checked this website today because it is very rainy outside LOL.they claim that they have variation in eye colour and skin colour I replyd this to someone who keeped taliking about black have also variation blah blah blah
Benjamin
Middelburg, Netherlands


I agree blacks can have non dark brown eyes but africa blacks have like a 1-5 % white admixture and blue or green eyes are like 1/100000 over there.I have seen the african soccer cup of the non north african countries non had blue or green eyes.my city have a lot of african blacks but I have never seen a blue or green eyed only some carribean some ones that says says it is very uncommen.african americans have much more white admixture(30% of african americans males have the y chromosome of european forefarter and most slaves after 1750 were mulatto)so more blue/green eyes but still uncommen also because like 50% of whites were afro americans mixed with had brown eyes.if chinese had been slaves for 400 years and mixed a lot with whites like black in 1700-1800 a lot of ''chinese'' would have eye colour variation to.



I played it save with the 1/10000 LOL.They also say we have so much diferent skin tones.I thought you have a lot of differnt white admixture
smiley36.gif

most slaves after 1750 were mulatto and were called black(one drop rule).they also say on that website say the same about kinky hair that they can have straight.yes you can have as afro-american straight hair but the blacks in sub sharan african don't have that.

double standard:hating whites but claiming white features as black
 
Top