Was just reading an AP article on Marcus Williams' civil suit against Bill Romanowski. Williams is seeking $3.8 million as a result of injuries suffered in a training camp fight in August of '03.
We all know Romanowski is one of the most demonized white athletes of our time. The Sporting News just this week has an article about previous "bad boy" Raiders now that Randy Moss has been traded to Oakland, and Romo is mentioned along with the spitting incident that occurred when he was on Denver. How many blacks have spit over the years, but only Romanowski is never forgiven for doing it.
The media would undoubtedly love to see Williams prevail in order to have an example that can be cited for years of white brutality and white-on-black violence.
Here's a snippet from the article:
"Romanowski's lawyer, Jeffrey Springer, told jurors that Williams wasn't attacked from behind but actively engaged in a fight with his teammate. "They got locked up in mutual combat," Springer said.
"Springer also suggested that Williams' lawsuit was motivated by money, and that Williams deliberately undermined cognitive tests done to gauge the extent of his brain injury by smoking marijuana.
"'This case is about a payday,'" Springer said.
"The attack occurred after Williams blocked Romanowski during an early season practice. After the play, Romanowski came up to Williams from behind, tore off his teammate's helmet and socked him."
Read the first paragraph and then the last one. The first one gives part of Romanowski's defense -- that he didn't come up from behind on Williams and ambush him. But then the last paragraph states Williams' position as fact -- "Romanowski came up to Williams from behind. . ."
The AP reporter has quite blatantly taken Williams position and stated it as fact rather than as one opinion in a contested legal controversy!
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2002577
We all know Romanowski is one of the most demonized white athletes of our time. The Sporting News just this week has an article about previous "bad boy" Raiders now that Randy Moss has been traded to Oakland, and Romo is mentioned along with the spitting incident that occurred when he was on Denver. How many blacks have spit over the years, but only Romanowski is never forgiven for doing it.
The media would undoubtedly love to see Williams prevail in order to have an example that can be cited for years of white brutality and white-on-black violence.
Here's a snippet from the article:
"Romanowski's lawyer, Jeffrey Springer, told jurors that Williams wasn't attacked from behind but actively engaged in a fight with his teammate. "They got locked up in mutual combat," Springer said.
"Springer also suggested that Williams' lawsuit was motivated by money, and that Williams deliberately undermined cognitive tests done to gauge the extent of his brain injury by smoking marijuana.
"'This case is about a payday,'" Springer said.
"The attack occurred after Williams blocked Romanowski during an early season practice. After the play, Romanowski came up to Williams from behind, tore off his teammate's helmet and socked him."
Read the first paragraph and then the last one. The first one gives part of Romanowski's defense -- that he didn't come up from behind on Williams and ambush him. But then the last paragraph states Williams' position as fact -- "Romanowski came up to Williams from behind. . ."
The AP reporter has quite blatantly taken Williams position and stated it as fact rather than as one opinion in a contested legal controversy!
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2002577