Jimmy was Right, Part Deux

[Guest]

Read this articulate and accurate article from this very site. It is describing EXACTLY what Jimmy the Greek said that got him fired. Blacks in the U.S. have a higher percentage of athletic freaks simply because slaveholders in the 1800s bred them to be that way, those idiots. It's the only explanation that makes sense:


[url]http://www.castefootball.us/viewarticle.asp?sportID=14&t eamID=0&ID=22747[/url]


p.s. please, if you are going to respond to this, read the article first. Otherwise, keep your pie hole shut. Thanks.

 

[jaxvid]

Please read the article yourself before opening YOUR pie hole. No where does "slave breeding" come into the disussion. Unless you are unclear on the point of the article: what it is saying is that yes, there are blacks with high physical potential due to natural development that occurred over eons in africa. Not in a few generations in America.

And no matter that there are some african "freaks" this does not grant to them a total monopoly on everything physical. Please re-read the article.


(from the article)
"However, just as one would not grant a total monopoly to the white race in matters of intellectual ability so should one not grant this monopoly in athletics to the black race. Just because they are dominant in some areas does not mean that they are naturally inclined to dominate in other areas.

A good example is the case of the Williams sisters in women's tennis. Serena and Venus Williams are basically freaks of nature. The natural muscularity that they posses as a matter of genetics is ridiculous in comparison to most other women, both black and white. It is this mutant occurrence, much more common amongst the people of their race but still very rare, that allows them to be competitive as highly notable exceptions to the normal abilities of their people.

There are very few black women in tennis, due in part to culture, but the few black women who play the game do not do all that well. It is only Serena and Venus with their ridiculously masculine builds that succeed. This does not mean that blacks are meant to be the best tennis players; it means that the unusual physical skills prevalent in a higher percentage of their genetic population will allow for these occasional exceptions. After all, it is not a coincidence that two sisters are the only really successful black female tennis players. Other than twins, who could be more genetically similar then siblings?

In many team sports blacks posses similar levels of "mutation" which results in exceptional athletes. Unfortunately this has lead to a culture-wide belief that ALL black athletes are superior in this manner, which is not true. Whites frequently outperform those black athletes that fall below the high levels of their exceptionally gifted "brothers". However the aura of those exceptional performers, and a society disposed toward favoring certain previously disadvantaged groups, allows the lesser talents to be acclaimed in much the same manner as the very good ones. This is unfair to those white athletes that are also in the top of their racial athletic-skill "bell-curve". "

 

[C Darwin]

The micro-evolutionist can only come up with one micro theory? I can offer another possible explanation. When you combine an overrepresented desire to have a career in professional sports within the black community link, with a high value for athleticism within the black community link, with a R reproductive strategy within the black community link, with the principles of advantageous mutations and adaptive radiation link, and with the principle of the ecological niche link, you will find that there are many opportunities to give rise to the black athletic "freak". Selective breeding for productivity as a farm worker would have almost no difference than natural selection in a Nebraska farming community in terms of creating athletes over the same amount of time. However I would imagine that they could jump down and turn around with the best of em'.

Gordie Howe is my favorite freak.
Edited by: C Darwin

 

[White Shogun]

p.s. please, if you are going to respond to this, read the article first. Otherwise, keep your pie hole shut. Thanks.

Are you unable to write an articulate post that will explain your ideas without hurling insults and telling people to shut their pie holes?

Just because people here disagree with you doesn't give you license to be uncivil.

In addition, although this is an internet message board, you are still a guest here. It behooves you to be polite, especially if you are interested in remaining a member of the forum.

Edited by: White Shogun

 

[White_Savage]

I've read this entire article, in fact I responded to this article in the original thread. As you will notice, myself and other members here disagree with J.B.'s premise, quite vehemently.

Let me sort this out for you right quick Rizzo:
The Black male Homo Sapiens is perhaps 2% faster than the White male Homo Sapiens (going by what the best athletes do in the 100 yrd dash).

The White male exceeds the Black by an equal or greater margin in every record for raw strength known to man. Whites also have greater muscular endurance. Blacks are only superior athletes if you conveniently define "athletic" as the physical traits where Blacks have an advantage, and even there, it is grossly overstated.

Native puro Africans are excellent sprinters, but they don't really compete with their American cousins at anything else. The and strength of many Afro-Americans isn't really found on the dark continent, so that's probably a result of the hybridization with Whites + perhaps a little selective slave buying.

The "freakish muscularity" of the Williams sisters and Black athletes did not exist in the past for such black athletes as Jesse Owens, Joe Louis, or even Cassius Clay, because it comes from a needle. There is the possibility that Blacks respond better to steroids.

By way of further explification:
Whites currently dominate all strength sports (despite the fact that every athlete lifts weights, therefore Blacks have some sort of chance to enter powerlifting if they have the talent). Whites have always dominated wrestling, despite the fact that a scholarship is even more desirable for low I.Q. Blacks than for White students who don't need athletics to get into college. Whites dominate MMA/NHB fighting. Whites now dominate proffesional boxing, in spite of the fact that only a miniscule number of Whites attempt to box, in comparison to Black numbers. In short, Whites are competitive in nearly every sport that doesn't have a Caste system, and they dominate the fighting and strength sports that constitute the most rugged and direct tests of physical prowess and manhood.

I'm sorry if you can't jive this with the conditioning you've recieved to feel weak and enfeminate in comparison with the "all mighty blacky", but you'll feel better if you shake off the inferiority complex instead of taking time to troll this website.

Edited by: White_Savage