Females in Athletics

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
Although blacks have taken over sprinting for the most part in both numbers and records, white women have been surprisingly holding their ground. I never give them enough credit, but these girls are really fast. White females are doing much better than white males for a number of reasons:

1. Apparently, because they are used to having an inferiority complex in sports, they can deal with people telling them they are slow. They shake it off because they know men are faster. White males, on the other hand, will believe they are slower when this myth is bombarded against them.
2. Maybe because the popularity of female sprinters is not very high and not many people watch them, the US and Carribean nations didn't feel the need to push steroids on their black hopes. It seems like they have been lately, yet still white women have been doing well all the way up to the 2004 Olympic games.

I believe that white men shhould be just as competitive as white women. They have the same genes!

Here are some of their accomplishments:

Irina Privolova: Tied for the sixth fastest women in history at 10.77 seconds! A woman running that fast! She is tied with the beauty Ivet Lalova. At the Olympics she took the bronze in Barcelona 1992, and Gold in the 400 meter hurdles in Sydney 2000. She has four European championship golds in the 100m and 200m. She has a silver and a bronze in the 200m world championships, and another bronze in the 100m.

Ivet Lalova: Tied with Privolova for the fastest white women in history and sixth fastest woman. She has not been so good after an injury in 2007, but has a gold at the European Indoor Championships in the 200 meter.

Yulia Nestsiarenka: 2004 Gold medalist in the 100 meters and won it in 10.93 seconds! She did well in Beijing running 11.1. She was just too old (31).

Jarmila Kratochvílová: The second fastest 400 meter ever. A white women has the first one too but she is from East Germany. Probably the only clean sub 48 second 400 meterr by a female.

For the 200 meter white women have two tied for the fourth fastest time and two tied for the eigth. They are all from East Germany. It is hillarios how obvious all the 200 meters are just dirty because the only countries on the top ten list are EAST GERMANY, the USA, and JAMAICA. It does not get more blatant than that. That tells you exactly what boat the USA and JAMAICA are in, right in there with EAST GERMANY. HA. From now on all times from the USA, Great Britain, Jamaica, and the Carribean should be as tarnished as the ones from East Germany.
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
Here is Irina Privolova holding her ground against some cheaters in Barcelona, while securing the bronze in 10.84 seconds!

[tube]abbEq4Lt47A[/tube]
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
Also white women hold the world record in the 60 meter with Irina Privalova's 6.92.
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
Good thread- like WL was talking about, since I learned about her a couple years back, I have always had the hots for Ivet Lolova. Unfortunately "I couldn't catch her" if I tried- even though she would be a good catch...lol
smiley36.gif
(if I didn't already have a great girl.) Edited by: ToughJ.Riggins
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
Thanks for the coment TJR. I thought nobody would. But this thread is a perfect piece of evidence that sprints just don't add up. Why are white women doing so much better than white men?
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
A History of the 100 Meter Sprint

Thought by many to be the perfect sprint, the 100 meter is a mix of power, top speed, annd speed endurance; all in one. It is usually the main event of the Olympic games, revered for its short duration and its superhuman displayal of force.

But a cloud has covered the grandest of all races in the past several decades. Nobody denies that. However tainted tthe sport of track and field has become, many look at it and conclude that West African sprinters are far superior to caucasion athletes. Another common conclusion is that no white man can break the ten second "barrier."

One must look at the athletes who have won the gold medals in order to come to the conclusion that black athletes take steroids more regularly than whites. So far, there have been seven gold medals awarded in the 100 meter since a white man has won the race. The names of the winners are Carl Lewis (twice), Donovan Bailey, Linford Christie, Maurice Greene, Justin gatlin, and Usain Bolt. One cannot forget the Jamaican-born Ben Johnson also, who was stripped of his gold medal after stanozonal was found in his blood. Charlie Francis, Johnson's coach and author of Speed Trap, admitted after the positive test that most modern athletes take banned substances, and usually steroids. Carl Lewis himself tested positive for three types of stimulants before the Seoul Olympics he denounced Johnson in. In fact, he snubbed another Jamaican-born athlete by the name of Usain Bolt for winning his 100 meter in the same fashion of Ben Johnson. Johnson ran a 9.79 while slowing down towards the end to celebrate, just like Usain Bolt won in 9.69 seconds in Beijing. Carl lewis is certainly correct in saying, "So when people ask me about Bolt, I say he could be the greatest athlete of all-time. But for someone to run 10.03 one year and 9.69 the next, if you don't question that in a sport that has the reputation it has right now, you're a fool. Period." I believe Ben Johnson even questioned any athlete braking 9.80 seconds, saying, "Let's be real. Let me go through the list: Ben Johnson, Justin Gatlin, Tim Montgomery, Tyson Gay and the two Jamaicans. Six people have run under 9.80 legally, three have tested positive, and one had a year out."

In fact I will go into further detail on a different list. The list is of athletes who have won an Olympic gold after thee last non-black man to do it, Allan Wells. Carl Lewis tested postive for three types of stimulants before the Seoul olympics. Linford Christie tested positive for the steroid nandralone and for stimulants to "extend his career." Maurice Greene admitted to paying Angel Heredia $10,000, but stated he had never taken performance enhancing drugs. Heredia says otherwise. Justin Gatlin tested postive for doping. In fact, the only two athletes who have not failed a drug test are Usain Bolt and Jamaican-born Donovan Bailey. Both have made the sub 9.80 list that according to Carl lewis is made up of cheaters. Both are from jamaica, the country that has produced drug cheats Linford christie and Ben Johnson. Tim Montgomery was found guilty of using the performance-enhancing drug HGH. He, like many guilty athletes, ran under 9.80 seconds.

So what about white gold medallists? There are not too many of them. But it would be unfair to not name Kostas Kenetris, the 2000 olympic 200 meter champion and 19.85 200 meter runner. I am not going to defend probable cheaters even if they are white. I am using Keneteris to both point out the state of modern sprinting and to prove that juiced up white athletes are just as good as juiced up black athletes. Sure, the 200 meter is not the 100 meter, but it actually has a faster MPH average and is very comparable in speed endurance. Although Kenteris's missed tests are just as suspicious as Maurice Greene's drug money, one athlete holds a much stronger air of skepticism. You guessed it, Keneteris is constantly bashed on youtube and many other places for his supposed steroid use, but Maurice Greene is still considered one of the fastest men alive. While we are talking about 200 meter runners, Pietro Mennea should be brought up. He ran 19.72 in Mexico City and has also run 19.96. Although he admitted to using HGH, he used it in a time when it was the legal equivalent to caffeine or creatine, and not a banned substance. Another sub-20 200 meter runner that is white is Marcin Urbas of Poland, who ran a blazing 19.98.

I am bringing up white 200 meter runners who have broken 20 seconds to prove a point. The ten second barrier does not exist. There have been many white athletes who have come close to it without competition or mondo track surfaces. Valery Borzov ran 10.07 and 20.00 in the 1972 Olympics to win the gold in both events. Anybody who has seen a picture of him knows that he is certainly not taking what the athletes of today take. That, is an understatement. And of course, there is Matt Shirvington. His 10.03 into a .1 m/s headwind equates to a 9.88 with 2 m/s wind behind him. Unfortunately, other priorities got the best of him. Due to the amount of steroids in sports and a lack of white sprinters, whites barely make the top 100 list in the 100 meter. White athletes make the top 20 list in the 60 meter however, with Morne Nagel's 6.48 60 meter. And in the 50 meter whites come in fourth and tenth alltime. Of course many of the black names at the top of these lists use steroids. It is perfectly apt to assume that if whites can obliterate 20 second in the 200 meter and run world class 50 meter and 60 meter times, then success should be translated to the 100 meter.

I am not saying that all black athletes take steroids. Nor am I saying that all white athletes refrain from them. But the countries who have historically dominated the short sprints have both a lot of black people, and a lot of steroids. These countries are the United States, Jamaica, other Carribean Nations, and the United Kingdom. Most of the athletes in these countries probably take steroids today, and have many times in the past. Greece cannot be overlooked, too. Blacks are also more likely to take them because they are not scrutinized as much. Any white that competes with black athletes, such as Kostas Kenteris, will always be watched more closely. There are many other reasons that blacks are probably more guilty of substance abuse IN SPINTING (I am aware many whites take steroids in other sports, even Olympic sports). For instance, why do blacks do better in the United States and Carribean then they do in West Africa? Why are whites in Africa such as Morne Nagel and Wilhelm Van der Vyver just as competitive as the black majority? Poverty? Not in running, people.

White athletes typically do worse where they are discouraged from sprinting, also. The 100 meter is not an event many athletic white Americans take part of or persue as a professional sport anymore. There are still Bobby Morrows out there, but they are playing more conceivable sports in their point of view.

One last inconsistency is the disparity between the success of female white athletes to the success of male white athletes. Female white athletes hold the 50 meter and 60 meter world record (Irina Privalova). They also hold the top couple 400 meters in history. As recent as 2004 a white woman has won a gold medal in the 100 meters. Irina Privavlova secured a bronze medal in Barcelona and has run a 10.77 100m meter. She is the third fastest clean woman in history behind Christine Arron and Evelyn Ashford by only .04 off of Arron. However, Arron and Ashford's times are not as fast because they had a much stronger wind behind them, and Privalova only had a .9 m/s tailwind. If you convert all of the the top three times to 2 m/s wind, Ivet Lalova has the fastest time ever run by a woman, and Irina privalova has the second fastest. Nevertheless, both are technically tied for being the sixth fastest in history, doing much better than white males who have barely made the top 100. This may be because the fastest white women ran on the mondo tracks of today, whereas Valery borzov, Marian Woronin, and Allen Wells did not. If we saw these athletes competing today, they mighht still win against some of the juiced athletes. So too would Jesse Owens, Bob Hayes, and Jim Hines.

The list of dirty black women is, of course, comprised of the "fastest" women ever. They are FloJo, Marion Jones, and Merlene Ottey. All three are from the United States or Jamaica. It was funny when FloJo ran her world record becaue the announcer literally said, "nobody can run that fast." This should have been said by any sane person watching Usain Bolt.

All in all, sprinting is corrupt. After Ben Johnsonn and FloJo, the sport has spiraled downward into an abyss of drugs and scandals. The takeover of black athletes is very, very fishy. It happened after the corruption of the sport. It also happened after the Civil Rights Movement, but very few clean blacks have ever ran faster than clean whites. Not to mention, the Civil rights Movement was decades before 1980, and sports were integrated as long ago as 1932. The fastest clean time not at altitude in my opinion is Jason Gardner's 9.98. A white man is .02 off of that. White women are .04 off of clean black women. Whites and blacks certainly have different strengths. For whites, it is the first 50 meters and speed endurance phase. For blacks, it is top speed. But is any race truly faster? You decide.
 

albinosprint

Mentor
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
1,078
Location
New York
nice post star wars. I read that Greene paid his dealer 20k+, but anyhow. let me tell you about a kid that ran for my high school a few years after I graduated. he ran a 10.5x? in high school and when he got to college they made him run the 400m. Caste system at work. this kid was 5'-10" and was made to run the 100m but due to lack of tan was made to run the 400m. I heard that after 2 years of frustration he quit the track team. 10.5 coming from NY is really fast, for a college to put him in the 400m is retarded. I really think we would have seen a white man from the USA break 10 by now if the caste system wasn't so strongly in affect here.
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
Too many white people are so team oriented that they don't care enough about themselves. He should have spoke up.
 
Top