2012 London Olympics T & F Recap

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
In response to Don's suggestion to have a synopsis of the London results, I've taken the liberty to tally-up the medal counts. I'll leave it up to anyone who would like to use the data to write-up an article if they'd like to do so.

The results have their own wiki page here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athletics_at_the_2012_Summer_Olympics

I double checked each medal winner to ensure the accuracy, but I wouldn't mind if someone decided to do another set of verifications. Below are the results, with my comments/emphasis in bold-italics.

Overall

There were 47 total events, (24 for men, 23 for women), with a total of 141 medals up for grabs. Due to a 3-way tie for 3rd place in the men's high jump, an additional 2 bronzes were awared, bringing the total number to 143.

White athletes won 55 out of 143 medals, which comes to 38%.

[This is much lower than I expected, as I was hoping for close to a 50% figure]

Track Events

Out of 72 possible medals, Whites only won 12 medals, coming in at 17%. Unfortunately, the men did rather poorly, as the only men's medal winner was Galen Rupp of the US, who won a historic silver in the men's 10,000m race. This is a dismal 1/36 = 3%, a pathetic number, if we are to be honest.

White women, almost entirely led by Russia, won 11 medals out of a possible 36, which comes to a more respectable 31%. Highlights here included Sally Pearson, Mariya Savinova, Asli Alptekin, Natalya Antyukh, and Yulia Zaripova who all won gold. The women also won a silver and bronze in the 4x400 and 4x100 races, respectively.

[Where are the Western women other than Sally Pearson?]

Road Events

There were 15 overall medals available here, and the premier events were the men's and women's marathons, which were almost an East African sweep, save for Arkhipova of Russia who won bronze in the women's race. Whites also won 4/5 medals in the walks, bringing the total to 5/15 = 33%.

Field Events

This is a traditional White stronghold, and London was no exception. Out of 50 possible medals (48 + 2 additional bronzes for the men's HJ), Whites won 35 medals, which comes to 70%. I have not broken the medal count by men/women, but I believe it was fairly even. The highlights: men's/women's high jump, pole vault, discuss, hammer, shot-put, women's javelin & triple jump, and the men's long jump, where White athletes all won golds.

[Looks like business as usual here]

Combined Events

Just 6 total medals available here in the decathlon and heptathlon, where Whites won 3/6 medals, which comes to 50%.

Final Note

The men winning 1 out of 36 possible medals in the track events is very disturbing in my opinion. There was a complete shutout in all the sprints, and in some of the distance races (800m, 1500m, 5000m), there were some medal hopes that did not materialize. The biggest disappointment was of course Christophe Lemaitre and his subpar performance. A medal in 200m would have gone a long ways toward breaking down the stereotypes, but now we have to wait 4 more years.

I will leave it up the track experts in the forum to address this dismal showing by White men in the track events.
 

third wave

Newbie
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
9
A black Trinidadian won the gold in the men's javelin. This was the first time in 40 years that a non-European had won that event. Was this a one-off anomaly, or could this be a harbinger of things to come? Was this guy doping? I believe that as more blacks become interested in the field events, they will eventually come dominate these events as they do in track. White performance in track, especially the men's, was particularly dismal. Whites and blacks are about even in the jumps. A white man won the men's long jump, but a black won the women's. Black men also came first and second in the triple jump. The pole vault is largely white, but a black Cuban woman won the silver, and a black German won the bronze on the men's side. The throwing events are whites' last hope, but as the black javelin winner shows, whites have lost their grip on them as well. We just have to accept this new reality.
 

white is right

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,038
A black Trinidadian won the gold in the men's javelin. This was the first time in 40 years that a non-European had won that event. Was this a one-off anomaly, or could this be a harbinger of things to come? Was this guy doping? I believe that as more blacks become interested in the field events, they will eventually come dominate these events as they do in track. White performance in track, especially the men's, was particularly dismal. Whites and blacks are about even in the jumps. A white man won the men's long jump, but a black won the women's. Black men also came first and second in the triple jump. The pole vault is largely white, but a black Cuban woman won the silver, and a black German won the bronze on the men's side. The throwing events are whites' last hope, but as the black javelin winner shows, whites have lost their grip on them as well. We just have to accept this new reality.
I don't know what crack pipe your taking a drag on but there has never been a non White winner at the Olympics. A Black Cuban won silver last year in Korea and now this guy won gold they are both coached by the same Cuban coach. As for Blacks suddenly taking interest in throwing. They have always been throwing they just haven't been good enough to make the medal stand, less Michael Carter at the boycotted LA games and the Mulatto competitor this year who came third. Carter's daughter was on the US squad and placed in the top ten.
 

harold

Guru
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
129
tell me what is up with every country trying to out do
each other with homecoming celebrations for athletes
even the mediocre ones . you won a bronze ,lets throw a party
and just keep on laying the praise uponst you .

sport has become this horrible dishonest piece of **** .
no sport is safe from the hands of these lefty ****s
and once could safely relax and watch some of field events now
no so.
as ioc president says sport is powerful tool , and know how
,for dumbed down bored masses and a tool to spread
and increase multicluturalism and black athleism .
**** right off ,did you see closing ceremony with brazilian ****s
rio is going to be fun .


what the **** is wrong with people are they so dumped down
and nothing better to do .
understand media trying to get every little drop out of stories but not
the general public . all these events should be no more than a sidenote
in the paper and then get on with honest proper exsistance.







as for fanny from trinidad lets name a lighthouse after you ,
he is more than likely on what all trinidad sprinters are on
and only upshot is that this new ped doesnt seem to
enhance strength events as much , but sure will find
more tradition roids before long

if the european throwers bothered to show up then wouldnt
be hearing about him for moment anyway .
where to you get event where qualifying throw was best throw
and by nearly 4 metres . javelin is heavily in regression .
 

harold

Guru
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
129
i do suspect turd wave is a tr***

i think when said non-european ,was referring to american cy young in 1952 ,full stop ...



that is problem with sport now , simply a tool
for ones own propaganda , and with these simpleton black ****s being most common .

do you not realise it has all been done before .
that it is all solely due to white society and intelligence ,stability, you name it.
if wanted could rule the sprints again but no will with powers that be .

i have a dream , a dream that athletics will once again be totally and solely european origin again
and the facade of drug use will be a thing of past ,as all legal and out in open
and no dishonesty and just get on with it .
there will always be that human element to it ,so not just one with best chemist ,wins .
if only could set up a federation to rival iaaf .
 
Last edited:

third wave

Newbie
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
9
i do suspect turd wave is a tr***

i think when said non-european ,was referring to american cy young in 1952 ,full stop ...



that is problem with sport now , simply a tool
for ones own propaganda , and with these simpleton black ****s being most common .

do you not realise it has all been done before .
that it is all solely due to white society and intelligence ,stability, you name it.
if wanted could rule the sprints again but no will with powers that be .

i have a dream , a dream that athletics will once again be totally and solely european origin again
and the facade of drug use will be a thing of past ,as all legal and out in open
and no dishonesty and just get on with it .
there will always be that human element to it ,so not just one with best chemist ,wins .
if only could set up a federation to rival iaaf .

Are you saying that Caribbean athletes have access to better chemists than white American or white European athletes? How have you personally contributed to the advancement of white society?
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
for me the highlight of the games was whites winning high jump, pole vault, long jump, and getting a surprising bronze medal in the triple jump (an event where we still have the world record)

we still dominate the events where you have to throw something too, except jevelin this time

this proves that whites do well in events where you have to be explosive, so they should do well in sprints too

also the american guy who proved that whites could compete with the kenyans (rupp)
 
Last edited:

white is right

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,038
i do suspect turd wave is a tr***

i think when said non-european ,was referring to american cy young in 1952 ,full stop ...



that is problem with sport now , simply a tool
for ones own propaganda , and with these simpleton black ****s being most common .

do you not realise it has all been done before .
that it is all solely due to white society and intelligence ,stability, you name it.
if wanted could rule the sprints again but no will with powers that be .

i have a dream , a dream that athletics will once again be totally and solely european origin again
and the facade of drug use will be a thing of past ,as all legal and out in open
and no dishonesty and just get on with it .
there will always be that human element to it ,so not just one with best chemist ,wins .
if only could set up a federation to rival iaaf .


This guy looks White to me? He might be a "minority" by the the one drop rule but essentially he is at least predominately Caucasian. As for the troll if Lemaitre had grabbed a bronze in the 200 would he state that this harbringers a White comeback in the sprints? I highly doubt it as he obviously thinks that any sport that Blacks don't dominate is because they have no interest. Ps he has been on this site over the years in many forms he has a sick fetish...:frusty:.....http://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/ne...at-the-1952-news-photo/2659870?Language=en-US
 

FootballDad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
5,153
Location
Somewhere near Kansas City, MO
Are you saying that Caribbean athletes have access to better chemists than white American or white European athletes? How have you personally contributed to the advancement of white society?
Yes, Mr. Troll, Caribbean athletes do not have to worry about year 'round drug testing and such, like American or European (black ones, too) athletes do. That's the advantage, for a cheater, of living in a third-world hellhole. And yes, I've contributed to white society by marrying a wonderful white woman and raising white racially aware children.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Yes, Mr. Troll, Caribbean athletes do not have to worry about year 'round drug testing and such, like American or European (black ones, too) athletes do. That's the advantage, for a cheater, of living in a third-world hellhole. And yes, I've contributed to white society by marrying a wonderful white woman and raising white racially aware children.

Football Dad = 1, Troll = 0 :clap2:
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
Well I haven't been in this site for ever (it feels like it) and I couldn't resist after almost a month and after an event such the Olympics, not to post my views on such thread!
I hope everyone is OK and had great summer vacations.

1. I attended the Olympics of London (3 days, 5 events) and I had a blast, these were the third Olympics I attend in person and it was a whole new experience. The previous were Athens 2004 of course and Turin 2006.

2. By seeing how the VAST MAJORITY of the members in here who call their selves "proud pro white men" are being pessimists, feel like losers after those WHITE DOMINATED OLYMPICS, I remembered why I have traditionally being offensive, hostile and in constant doubt of the honest and true "pro whiteness" of most members in here. I have counted so far the total members by race from Athletics to Football (in alphabetical order) and so far here's how it goes: Whites - 250 medals............ Asians - 65 medals............. Blacks - 86 medals (They lead over Asians simply because i have counted Athletics where they won like 75something medals, they will EASILY be surpassed by Asians once I am done with the total medal count)............ Other races (Arabic, Mexicans etc) - 13 medals.............Yet in this "pro white" forum most members cry and act like whites are the biggest losers of these Olympics..................Quite sickening to put it as nicely as it can be put :)

3. From the 3 most "diverse' and "open minded' nations of the planet aka USA, UK and France, UK did EXTREMELY well, since it looks like over 90% of the medals were won by white athletes (not final countdown yet). Whites for USA might reached rock bottom since it looks like they won the lowest percentage for team USA ever, between 67-69% of the medals for team USA. France...........I have no words to describe my second home, embarrassing Judo team!

4. Greece had the worse Olympic results since 1988..........All Greece won was 2 bronze medals in rowing and Judo. Greece used to be "Jamaica" in Jamaica's position, in terms of medals per capita success at the Olympics back in 1996 (8 medals), 2000 (13 medals) and 2004 (16 medals), but as the wise says "if there's no money, there's no honey"
For the record Greece of the 10 million has 146 medals in modern Olympic history though, more than any African or fully black nation, with Kenya coming closer with 86 (Kenya has x 4.5 bigger population than Greece)...........that speaks volumes for the limited athleticism blacks have as a kind.
http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/countries/

5. I wonder if some (most) members in here will ever realize and convince their selves that 10 seconds of running is WAY LESS athletic than sports (white dominated) such as gymnastics, triathlon, swimming, wrestling etc and be happy for all we dominate as a superior kind and stop crying for what we don't dominate :)

6. In case some wonder where I have been this month, I spent 9 days in world's most beautiful island aka Santorini, with my darling and then I decided i wanted to go "witness" the white athletic superiority in London and took my woman and went to London for 3 days..............Food sucks in London, big time!
Don, don't tell me you expected me to sit home and crying (for my punishment for being such a bad boy) for the "disaster" that happened to me in this forum huh? LOL

PS
Did I mention that white athletes dominated and smashed the medal tables and no REAL pro white man should cry like a baby for the very few INSIGNIFICANT events we didn't dominate ? I think I did..............Btw, I didn't know a Negro had to win an event at the gymnastics (even by massive robbery) for gymnastics to get so much media "attention" in the US...................The specific gymnastic event that the Negro won OWNS heavyweight boxing in terms of athleticism and TV Ratings in the US...............SAY WHAT? TRUE STORY ....................AMERICA, AMERICA, AMERICAN LOL
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
2. By seeing how the VAST MAJORITY of the members in here who call their selves "proud pro white men" are being pessimists, feel like losers after those WHITE DOMINATED OLYMPICS, I remembered why I have traditionally being offensive, hostile and in constant doubt of the honest and true "pro whiteness" of most members in here. I have counted so far the total members by race from Athletics to Football (in alphabetical order) and so far here's how it goes: Whites - 250 medals............ Asians - 65 medals............. Blacks - 86 medals (They lead over Asians simply because i have counted Athletics where they won like 75something medals, they will EASILY be surpassed by Asians once I am done with the total medal count)............ Other races (Arabic, Mexicans etc) - 13 medals.............Yet in this "pro white" forum most members cry and act like whites are the biggest losers of these Olympics..................Quite sickening to put it as nicely as it can be put :)

No one is crying that Whites were losers in these Olympics. This is the Track & Field forum. If you read my breakdown, you'll note that Whites won 38% of overall track medals, 17% in the sprint/distance events, with men winning only 1 medal. So, the facts are that White men did not do very well in the track events. There's no dispute here, I simply pointed this out. This is not a verdict on the entire Olympics.

There were 962 total medals awarded in London:

http://www.nbcolympics.com/medals/2012-standings/index.html

If you just add up the Asian countries, (China, Japan, Korea, and the others), the total comes to 174. So, Asians won 174/962 = 18% of the total medals. Then, I added up just the African countries, it came to 55 medals, which is 55/962 = 6%.

Now, if one goes thru and adds up all the other medals won by non-Whites on team USA, France, Great Britain, etc., plus non-Whites from South America/North Africa/Middle East, my guess here is that Whites probably won something like 65-70% of all the medals in the London Olympics.

This is a tremendous accomplishment, considering Whites make up < 10% of the world population.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,418
Location
Pennsylvania
No one is crying that Whites were losers in these Olympics. This is the Track & Field forum. If you read my breakdown, you'll note that Whites won 38% of overall track medals, 17% in the sprint/distance events, with men winning only 1 medal. So, the facts are that White men did not do very well in the track events. There's no dispute here, I simply pointed this out. This is not a verdict on the entire Olympics.

I guess Zeuss is incapable of writing a single post without either criticizing the posters here or trying to ignite a flame war. I'm still not sure if it's chronic immaturity, arrogance, a combination of both, or maybe a more deliberate agenda is at work.
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
I guess Zeuss is incapable of writing a single post without either criticizing the posters here or trying to ignite a flame war. I'm still not sure if it's chronic immaturity, arrogance, a combination of both, or maybe a more deliberate agenda is at work.

Deliberate agenda? You got me man, I work for MOSAD and I try to ruin the forum which is about to change the world and ruin the Zionist banking, media and educational domination ;)

Maybe is just anger and frustration for being an honest, proud and hard working white man living in an anti-white world like this ? Ever considered this?
Anyways, I had no idea this thread was only about Track and Field, I apologize to the person who opened it, I thought it was a resume of the Olympics as a total...........English is a language I use only when I get online, some people need to realize that before they jump on quick conclusions.

Should not someone open a thread of the total resume of the Olympics which will show, point out and celebrate the domination of the white athlete in so many sports and events in such a pro white site for a change though? Or do I ask too much? After all everything "pro white" I have asked in this forum (a white athletic superiority page in Wiki etc) seems to be "arrogant", "immature", "hiding an agenda" and so on!
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
Deliberate agenda? You got me man, I work for MOSAD and I try to ruin the forum which is about to change the world and ruin the Zionist banking, media and educational domination ;)

Maybe is just anger and frustration for being an honest, proud and hard working white man living in an anti-white world like this ? Ever considered this?
Anyways, I had no idea this thread was only about Track and Field, I apologize to the person who opened it, I thought it was a resume of the Olympics as a total...........English is a language I use only when I get online, some people need to realize that before they jump on quick conclusions.

Should not someone open a thread of the total resume of the Olympics which will show, point out and celebrate the domination of the white athlete in so many sports and events in such a pro white site for a change though? Or do I ask too much? After all everything "pro white" I have asked in this forum (a white athletic superiority page in Wiki etc) seems to be "arrogant", "immature", "hiding an agenda" and so on!

here is the thread about the olympics as a whole: http://www.castefootball.us/forums/threads/14938-2012-London-Olympics?p=255655#post255655

i look forward to see a complete breakdown of the medal winners by you

as for the aggressive tone of your first post in this thread, i suspect that you were drunk while posting it, since it was posted relatively late at night (if you were in europe at that moment)

and regarding france, it seems that every sports is black now, only some sports are black-free like kanoe kayak, some sports on boats ect

the only significant accomplishment by a black french athlete was the obese teddy rinner winning the sumo competition - oops, i mean the heavyweight division of judo
but it's fair to assume that it has nothing to do with race, as french seem to be very good at it, for example the white frenchman david douillet was the best in the world

and in athletics the only medals came from an arab in 3000 meters, the white french pole vaulter lavillenie (it was great to see him win the gold medal in his last attempt), only 1.76 meters tall which is amazing
 
Last edited:

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
as for the aggressive tone of your first post in this thread, i suspect that you were drunk while posting it, since it was posted relatively late at night (if you were in europe at that moment)

LMAO, good one Frederic and I hope you are well. Truth is you came way closer to your guess than Don did. I had just come back home (4 in the morning) from a common friend's wedding party (the Greek way lol) and I tried hard to avoid the "wedding plans" bed chatting that would follow and could last until early in the morning. So I claimed stomach ache and I came online until she would fall asleep........Plus this last month that we are both off work, we literally spend 24/7 together, which is awesome, but come on men need some space and time off or we get bored easily, at least I do! I wasn't drunk though, not even close. Anyways, I opened a thread about white dominance in these Olympics, you can check it and leave a post there and tell me what you think!
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Greece had the worse Olympic results since 1988..........All Greece won was 2 bronze medals in rowing and Judo. Greece used to be "Jamaica" in Jamaica's position, in terms of medals per capita success at the Olympics back in 1996 (8 medals), 2000 (13 medals) and 2004 (16 medals), but as the wise says "if there's no money, there's no honey"
For the record Greece of the 10 million has 146 medals in modern Olympic history though, more than any African or fully black nation, with Kenya coming closer with 86 (Kenya has x 4.5 bigger population than Greece

Ha! Fat lazy Greeks! only two bronze metals while the africans win so many! They should stop drinking so much ouzo and eating moussaka all of the time! Here in my native Michigan with only 9 million people we won 24 medals, most of them gold, and not in silly sports like rowing a boat or Judo but mostly in swimming, gymnastics and boxing. Those loser Greeks should be like proud White Michigan athletes and go to the Olympics and WIN!! not be imtimidated by little poor african skinny men. Maybe the Greeks should go again to Germany to beg for more money to support their lazy welfare state instead of being proud White working people!!
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
Ha! Fat lazy Greeks! only two bronze metals while the africans win so many! They should stop drinking so much ouzo and eating moussaka all of the time! Here in my native Michigan with only 9 million people we won 24 medals, most of them gold, and not in silly sports like rowing a boat or Judo but mostly in swimming, gymnastics and boxing. Those loser Greeks should be like proud White Michigan athletes and go to the Olympics and WIN!! not be imtimidated by little poor african skinny men. Maybe the Greeks should go again to Germany to beg for more money to support their lazy welfare state instead of being proud White working people!!

Man I don't know if I have to answer this rant of yours seriously or take it lightly.........Sure thing is that it's full of false rants and non accurate claims though and I can prove it to you easily by using straight facts how Greece has won more medals in track running events, than all white Americans have won in the last 50 years, or how the small nation of Greece has won way more medals than any fully black or African nation (including some nations like Nigeria, Cameroon, Kenya etc that are wayyy bigger than Greece in population), actually I think I proved that point and I even posted a link to support that claim of me.

I will say this and leave it at that though, Michigan or the US sure do win more medals than Greece at the Olympics, but did you know that in medals per capita Greece smashes USA? It takes 3 million Americans to produce an Olympic champ, when it takes 600,000 Greeks to do so, you can check it up in the all time medal rankings per capita!

But if you still want to compare tiny little Greece, especially the performance of Greece in these Olympics which I already said were the very worse we had in over 20 years, with the "perfect" and powerful USA for which blacks won nearly 30% of the medals in these Olympics, then let's compare numbers between Greece and USA in all these things:

1. Uneducated people
2. Hate crimes
3. Suicides
4. Armed Robberies
5. Obese people
6. Depressed people
7. People who live through welfare
8. Ghetto people
9. Number of people who live under extreme poverty

Do I have to keep going or you got the point?

PS
LMAO@ Greeks being intimidated from skinny Africans........So this incident took place in Greece then? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BODWUohtXHo

PS2: Man ouzo is a hell of a drink and moussaka a delicious dish, you would love it too right?

PS3: Not sure if this is an accurate claim, since I read it in a Greek newspaper but according to American researches about obesity in the US, your country has 43 million Obese people and 171 million being overweight.................That means that the obese American people could "create" 4,5 new countries with the population of Greece, while the overweight Americans could "create" 17 new countries with the population of Greece......now these are some scary numbers bro!

PS4: It's no secret that USA has the second biggest debt on planet earth, it's no secret that the country of USA as we know it today will collapse one day soon, just like USSR did.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/

PS5: Why do we compare USA with Greece? A new country which was created by Europeans mainly, African slaves, Asians and whatever Native Americans survived from the massacre, with a historic nation which gave birth to the Olympics and exists on these holy lands for over 10,000 years now?
How many Greek-Americans won medals for USA btw? What's your ancestry again? Man please, USA is not a nation, it's a "melting pot" country, there's a HUGE difference :)

What you were saying about fat and lazy by the way? ;)

On a serious note though, we need to get serious in this site and get the facts straight, fighting with each other over crap won't lead this nowhere!
 
Last edited:

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
In my opinion, from "our" perspective the athletics was a disaster.

In the most "visible" and "prestigious" event - the men's 100 metres - Whites were nowhere to be seen. Not a single White man made it past the heats (sorry, but this Adam Gemili fellow isn't White, nor would he even remotely be perceived as a White man by society at large...) so, yet again, we have "confirmation" of the "slow White guy" propaganda. What makes things even worse was the presence of a Chinese and Japanese in the semifinals, which "proved" that Whites are the slowest of them all...

Yes, I know that the blacks are juiced up (I'll wager that those two Asians were also on PEDs), but Christophe Lemaitre should have run the 100 metres even though we all know that he wouldn't have won the thing. At least the world would have seen a White man in the later stages of the competition. Visibility is the most important aspect in the current context. Your average non-sports fan never watches any athletics outside the Olympic Games so this 100 metres event is what sticks in peoples' memories and provides the prism through which they view "speed".

I gain my athletics information almost exclusively from the Caste Football forum (which, incidentally, has allowed me to pass myself off as some sort of apparently knowledgeable athletics "expert"...) so I read about Lemaitre's lack of professionalism and inadequate preparation with a mixture of trepidation and resignation. After eagerly anticipating his appearance at the 2012 Olympics for a couple of years and assuming that we would therefore have a worthy representative in the 100 metres who was even capable of reaching the final it was utterly deflating to see Lemaitre pull out of the blue ribbon event.

I figured that if Lemaitre possesses the ability to reach finals and mix it with the drug cheats without the help of "performance enhancers" then he should run both the 100 and 200 metre events. After all, he's 22 years old so "fatigue" shouldn't be a problem for a world-class athlete. ****, I never trained for athletics but when I was 22 I could churn out consecutive gut-busting sprints - despite my constant late nights, heavy boozing and "troubled" intolerance-laden constitution. Yet following a race this fellow wheezes like some sort of helpless emphysematous geriatric who's just shot off the end of a treadmill straight into the wall during a cardiopulmonary stress test...

If he had only put in the proper hard-core Olympic-level training, Lemaitre could have featured in both sprint finals and hence provided a White role model for a generation of little kids (that is, provided he didn't finish last - which, given the times in the 100 metres final, may well have been the case had he competed...). Unfulfilled potential - that's the truly disappointing part.

A couple of other things obtrude like fungus-encrusted canine spuds:

(a) Both the decathlon and heptathlon were won by blacks, so Negroes (albeit mulattoes or whatever) now hold the distinction of being the best all-round athletes. That's the third non-White decathlon gold medallist (and second in a row) since the dark days of that loud-mouthed prick Daley Thompson.

(b) A Negro won gold in the men's javelin (!!!) for the first time (after doubtlessly swallowing a trailer-full of pills and being perforated by needles galore), providing another kick in the teeth for us, as the usual "if only blacks take an event seriously" nonsense will now be afforded even more "credence"...
 

elispeedster

Mentor
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
685
In my opinion, from "our" perspective the athletics was a disaster.

In the most "visible" and "prestigious" event - the men's 100 metres - Whites were nowhere to be seen. Not a single White man made it past the heats (sorry, but this Adam Gemili fellow isn't White, nor would he even remotely be perceived as a White man by society at large...) so, yet again, we have "confirmation" of the "slow White guy" propaganda. What makes things even worse was the presence of a Chinese and Japanese in the semifinals, which "proved" that Whites are the slowest of them all...

Yes, I know that the blacks are juiced up (I'll wager that those two Asians were also on PEDs), but Christophe Lemaitre should have run the 100 metres even though we all know that he wouldn't have won the thing. At least the world would have seen a White man in the later stages of the competition. Visibility is the most important aspect in the current context. Your average non-sports fan never watches any athletics outside the Olympic Games so this 100 metres event is what sticks in peoples' memories and provides the prism through which they view "speed".

I gain my athletics information almost exclusively from the Caste Football forum (which, incidentally, has allowed me to pass myself off as some sort of apparently knowledgeable athletics "expert"...) so I read about Lemaitre's lack of professionalism and inadequate preparation with a mixture of trepidation and resignation. After eagerly anticipating his appearance at the 2012 Olympics for a couple of years and assuming that we would therefore have a worthy representative in the 100 metres who was even capable of reaching the final it was utterly deflating to see Lemaitre pull out of the blue ribbon event.

I figured that if Lemaitre possesses the ability to reach finals and mix it with the drug cheats without the help of "performance enhancers" then he should run both the 100 and 200 metre events. After all, he's 22 years old so "fatigue" shouldn't be a problem for a world-class athlete. ****, I never trained for athletics but when I was 22 I could churn out consecutive gut-busting sprints - despite my constant late nights, heavy boozing and "troubled" intolerance-laden constitution. Yet following a race this fellow wheezes like some sort of helpless emphysematous geriatric who's just shot off the end of a treadmill straight into the wall during a cardiopulmonary stress test...

If he had only put in the proper hard-core Olympic-level training, Lemaitre could have featured in both sprint finals and hence provided a White role model for a generation of little kids (that is, provided he didn't finish last - which, given the times in the 100 metres final, may well have been the case had he competed...). Unfulfilled potential - that's the truly disappointing part.

A couple of other things obtrude like fungus-encrusted canine spuds:

(a) Both the decathlon and heptathlon were won by blacks, so Negroes (albeit mulattoes or whatever) now hold the distinction of being the best all-round athletes. That's the third non-White decathlon gold medallist (and second in a row) since the dark days of that loud-mouthed prick Daley Thompson.

(b) A Negro won gold in the men's javelin (!!!) for the first time (after doubtlessly swallowing a trailer-full of pills and being perforated by needles galore), providing another kick in the teeth for us, as the usual "if only blacks take an event seriously" nonsense will now be afforded even more "credence"...


Not all the Black sprinters are taking PED's...though I am suspicious of a few... to claim they are all taking it is just being irrational and envious....Gemili is not White, correct, but he is Caucasian, and of Non West African Heritage. So he, like Lemaitre, is an anomaly for sprinting.

Lemaitre needs a motivator. Even Maurice Greene said that for his coach to tell him not to run the 100 beacuse he has no shot - and to strive for bronze in the 200 - is basically feeding Lemaitre's sub conscious that he wil never improve and be able to compete, and is, in fact, why he failed at the 200.

Leamitre, next to Bolt has probably the most natural talent, but is being limited by generic training. He needs to get stronger and change his approach to training.

His breathing problems has to do with, simply, they are not teaching him how to breathe correctly. He can run faster with good breathing. Breath gives energy.
 

Cartouche

Newbie
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
20
A couple of other things obtrude like fungus-encrusted canine spuds:

(a) Both the decathlon and heptathlon were won by blacks, so Negroes (albeit mulattoes or whatever) now hold the distinction of being the best all-round athletes. That's the third non-White decathlon gold medallist (and second in a row) since the dark days of that loud-mouthed prick Daley Thompson.

(b) A Negro won gold in the men's javelin (!!!) for the first time (after doubtlessly swallowing a trailer-full of pills and being perforated by needles galore), providing another kick in the teeth for us, as the usual "if only blacks take an event seriously" nonsense will now be afforded even more "credence"...

Surfing on this forum, I can't stand the flood of insanity anymore. First of all, the winners of the decathlon are hardly more than one-quarter black. For Goodness sake, my mother, who knows nothing about athletics, even confused Jessica Ennis for a girl from our national (European) squad! Actually, the historical winners of the decathlon have always been whites or mixed athletes (O'Brien, Thompson, Clay, Eaton).

Second, if you want to make predictions about the future development of some sport, you should have some basic idea about physical requirements of that sport and physical build of human races/ethnic groups. This needs a very intensive study, I admit. But I'll save your time.

The first thing that you should realize is that most athletic events (actually 15 out of 20) need height above 180 cm on average, and something similar applies for the majority of other prestigious Olympic sports. Height is the main determinator of sports performance. And who is the tallest in the world? US blacks with 178 cm? No. That's very moderate by today's European standards. Cubans in Havana with 173,4 cm? That's ridiculous. Jamaicans with 174-175 cm? In Europe, only Portuguese are smaller. So what populations are by far the tallest in the world, and utilized the benefits of the industrial revolution? Europeans? BINGO!

The tallest nation in the world are the Dutch (184 cm), but if you picked up a region, highlanders from the Dinaric Alps in former Yugoslavia are the tallest with 184.6 cm in 17-years olds (not fully grown youngsters!). This is why Croatia and Serbia routinely have the tallest teams at the Olympics. At least 12 European nations (Swedes, Danes, Germans, Czechs, Estonians, Lithuanians, Croats, Serbians, Dutch, Montenegrins, Bosniacs, possibly Slovaks) are more than 180 cm tall. Another 11 nations (Austrians, Poles, Norwegians, Belgians, Swiss, Finns, Slovenians, Greeks, possibly Latvians, Belarussians, French) are at or above the current mean of US blacks. US whites don't belong to the tallest nations of European descent with 179 cm, that's the truth, and similarly like in US blacks, their height increases only very slowly. Furthermore, it starts to be obvious that Germanic speaking regions and East Euros have a much bigger potential for height than West Europeans. You can expect an impressive increase of stature especially in the Baltic region and in the Balkans.

And what are the implications for athletics? Well, it's clear that an athlete, who is taller, has a naturally bigger potential. It's true that on average, blacks jump higher than a similarly tall white person, but the point is that they simply don't have enough tall persons for some events (do you watch the high jump competition?). Furthermore, I'll tell you a big secret that only a handful of people in the world know: The physique of North American blacks is not especially muscular in the world comparison and equals to that of Central Europeans. In other words, North American blacks are more muscular than West Europeans, but less muscular than East Europeans. (Yes, that's correct. Differences in body types within Europe are incredibly wide. In fact, the average Olympian from Eastern Europe weighs about 6-10 kg more than his counterpart from Western Europe!) The physique of US blacks is athletically versatile, but not especially endowed for any event outside the 100/200 m and the long jump, primarily due to moderate body height. Countries from the Caribbean are even smaller (and add their small population size), so if you see a lot of Caribbean athletes shining in athletics, then it must be clear to you that something strange is going on.

It would be a topic for a long discussion, but at least, I can tell you that running is practically dead everywhere in the industrialized world, and this has been the case since mid-80's already. The current ethnic composition of champions in the 400-1500 m becomes more and more ridiculous. And as for field events, they have been in decay since ca. 2000. For example, the average annual performances of Top 10 javelin throwers have declined by almost 3 meters since 2001! So expect more and more exotic medal winners in the future.
 

elispeedster

Mentor
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
685
And what are the implications for athletics? Well, it's clear that an athlete, who is taller, has a naturally bigger potential. It's true that on average, blacks jump higher than a similarly tall white person, but the point is that they simply don't have enough tall persons for some events (do you watch the high jump competition?). Furthermore, I'll tell you a big secret that only a handful of people in the world know: The physique of North American blacks is not especially muscular in the world comparison and equals to that of Central Europeans. In other words, North American blacks are more muscular than West Europeans, but less muscular than East Europeans. (Yes, that's correct. Differences in body types within Europe are incredibly wide. In fact, the average Olympian from Eastern Europe weighs about 6-10 kg more than his counterpart from Western Europe!) The physique of US blacks is athletically versatile, but not especially endowed for any event outside the 100/200 m and the long jump, primarily due to moderate body height. Countries from the Caribbean are even smaller (and add their small population size), so if you see a lot of Caribbean athletes shining in athletics, then it must be clear to you that something strange is going on.


Its not the overall height, its the body proportions. Blacks tend to have higher hips, longer limbs with shorter trunks. This may give them a slight advantage. Then you have guys like Lemaitre who has this type of body. The difference, over a larger population, you will find more Blacks that have this kind of build which may be an advantage in sprinting and therefore gives a larger selection to choose in comparison to Whites and even less with Asians. Mind you, the differences is minimal, but it is there.
 

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
Not all the Black sprinters are taking PED's...though I am suspicious of a few... to claim they are all taking it is just being irrational and envious....Gemili is not White, correct, but he is Caucasian, and of Non West African Heritage. So he, like Lemaitre, is an anomaly for sprinting.

elispeedster -

Obviously I didn't make myself clear. It goes without saying that not all black sprinters are on the juice - but those who form the top echelon (Bolt, Blake, et cetera) of "guaranteed" medallists and finalists doubtlessly are. Funnily enough, they just happen to be black...
 

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
Surfing on this forum, I can't stand the flood of insanity anymore. First of all, the winners of the decathlon are hardly more than one-quarter black. For Goodness sake, my mother, who knows nothing about athletics, even confused Jessica Ennis for a girl from our national (European) squad! Actually, the historical winners of the decathlon have always been whites or mixed athletes (O'Brien, Thompson, Clay, Eaton).

Second, if you want to make predictions about the future development of some sport, you should have some basic idea about physical requirements of that sport and physical build of human races/ethnic groups. This needs a very intensive study, I admit. But I'll save your time.

Cartouche -

Insanity, eh? How "non-judgemental" of You...

Tell me, what's so insane about labelling Jessica Ennis a mulatto when her father is a bloody well Jamaican negro? Here is a photo of Ennis, complete with her parents and fiance:

adcb6_120221025240-ennis-family-horizontal-gallery.jpg


She certainly isn't White. I hope that much is obvious...

How on earth was I making any predictions about the future of a sport? In reference to the javelin event, I was simply commenting on the propaganda value of the Trinidadian's win and its reinforcement of prevalent perceptions of black "athleticism".

By the way, thanks for "saving me the time", but best brush up on those comprehension skills, mate - that could save You a bit of time...
 
Top