Jack Lambert said:Westside said:
That's some good news, and Jim DeMint has been declared the winner over AA candidate Alvin Greene in South Carolina.
I was hoping for Greene to win. It'd be kind of cool to have a genuine nut in the Senate.
Tea Party Subverted By NeoCON(s)
- Thread starter DixieDestroyer
- Start date
I was hoping for Greene to win. It'd be kind of cool to have a genuine nut in the Senate.
PhillyBirds
Mentor
Not sure if it's been mentioned here already, but it appears that Arizona has passed a ballot initiative called Proposition 107. Described as:
Looks like it passed by a 60-40 margin. What's in the water down there in Arizona?
Looks like it passed by a 60-40 margin. What's in the water down there in Arizona?
PhillyBirds on the opposite end, just as DWFs are one of the enemies or pillars that is the foundation of the Castesystem in Pro Football and sports in America. The SWVs (stupid white voters)in Ca and Nevada are the enemies or obstacles to liberty in America. My God, how they vote in Boxer, Reid and moonbeam Brown in again!!! It boggles my mind.
The economy is not going to get better in a year. These states hopefully will not get a fiat penny with the Repubs in congress. Therefore all these public workers and unions will find themselves with pinks slips in 6 to 8 months. Then the fit will hit the shan. It called tough love, lay them all off and start anew with contracts and pensions.
Why should responsible states bail out Ca and Nevada. No way, no how. Jerry Brown will find that being governor of Ca is a bitch. Or the citizens of Ca will again pick up the tap. F**K!
The economy is not going to get better in a year. These states hopefully will not get a fiat penny with the Repubs in congress. Therefore all these public workers and unions will find themselves with pinks slips in 6 to 8 months. Then the fit will hit the shan. It called tough love, lay them all off and start anew with contracts and pensions.
Why should responsible states bail out Ca and Nevada. No way, no how. Jerry Brown will find that being governor of Ca is a bitch. Or the citizens of Ca will again pick up the tap. F**K!
Riddlewire
Master
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,565
Westside said:
I have seen no indication that the Boehner-wing of the Republican Party intends to fight very hard against the liberal bailout monster. They won't even commit to repeal of Obamacare. Last night was a very weak victory. It makes the Republican party feel good about itself, but does little to reverse the damage from B. Hussein.
I don't see any reason to be happy on the Midterm results. The DEMONcrats still control Senate (where the real power and support for the Pres. lies) and the Republic**tS are celebrating in what is really a shallow and false victory. They're still in line for a huge letdown in 2012, when Obamination get reelected.
Goes to show what terrible state the US is in right now, the worst ever in it's history. Only a matter of time before y'all (Americans) have to KISS the RED Communist/Socialist carpet that is.... CHINA.
Goes to show what terrible state the US is in right now, the worst ever in it's history. Only a matter of time before y'all (Americans) have to KISS the RED Communist/Socialist carpet that is.... CHINA.
10 minutes ago he said they will lay the foundation to repeal Obamacare! Make no mistake if this Republican now controlled congress doesn't take steps to repeal this obamanation or defund it for the next two years. A third party will arise and say good riddance to the GOP!
Also, I say give it a chance rather than dump on it the very next day. What sense does that make? I invested alot of money and time in support of TEA Party Candidates to just roll over and say its business as usual.
Also, I say give it a chance rather than dump on it the very next day. What sense does that make? I invested alot of money and time in support of TEA Party Candidates to just roll over and say its business as usual.
I supported and invested in Rand Paul and other TEA Party candidates , if he rolls over, then truly there is no hope. And the spirit of fighting against the Caste system and big government is a big waste of time.
And j4181, I will never kiss anything red nor yellow, I will fight to the end for small government and my freedom.
And j4181, I will never kiss anything red nor yellow, I will fight to the end for small government and my freedom.
Riddlewire
Master
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,565
"It is important for us to lay the groundwork before we begin to repeal this monstrosity and replace it with commonsense reforms."
That's what Boehner said.
Those are not the words of someone who intends to eliminate said program.
My interpretation of his words:
"At some point in the distant future, when we have collaborated with receptive Democrats to create legislation that benefits both groups of Congressmen with positive press and earmarks, we will announce a new 'reformed' version of Obamacare that we promise will be AWESOME for the American people."
That's what Boehner said.
Those are not the words of someone who intends to eliminate said program.
My interpretation of his words:
"At some point in the distant future, when we have collaborated with receptive Democrats to create legislation that benefits both groups of Congressmen with positive press and earmarks, we will announce a new 'reformed' version of Obamacare that we promise will be AWESOME for the American people."
Just so that it is very clear, I want the GOP controlled congress to do the following:
1. Repeal the entire Obamacare
2. Cut spending to 2008 levels
3. Seal the borders
4. Make permanent the Bush Tax cuts of 2000.
The above is just for starters! anything else is unacceptable to me. Also, I think the word " repeal" carries weight. Man, if it is a charade, the country is in a sh*t sandwich.
Riddlewire, everyone has interpretations, but the above is what I expect, simply as that. I will not get into a flame war over conjecture, lets give them a chance. Americans like me will be watching very carefully without compromise. If what you suggest happens, then its every man for himself.
1. Repeal the entire Obamacare
2. Cut spending to 2008 levels
3. Seal the borders
4. Make permanent the Bush Tax cuts of 2000.
The above is just for starters! anything else is unacceptable to me. Also, I think the word " repeal" carries weight. Man, if it is a charade, the country is in a sh*t sandwich.
Riddlewire, everyone has interpretations, but the above is what I expect, simply as that. I will not get into a flame war over conjecture, lets give them a chance. Americans like me will be watching very carefully without compromise. If what you suggest happens, then its every man for himself.
NO WAY!!!! I'm just dumbfounded by the Yahoo posters. They're clearly blind to the truth on the deceptions of Obama and either parties.Westside said:
I'm sorry, politics really isn't my thing, I'll try to just focus on sports, for now. Need more experience on such matters.
Freethinker
Hall of Famer
I have to say that yesterday was a great day in the overall awakening of the American public and the Freedom Movement. While I wish that real change would come sweeping through, that is not realistic. Incremental steps have already begun and it will continue to snowball.
Westside, I also personally invested in Rand Paul's campaign. I believe in his principals because I believe in his father, who defines the word patriot. It is truly amazing that we have elected a LIBERTARIAN / CONSTITUTIONALISTS to the Senate. Just 2 years ago I thought this was impossible.
I wanted to ask Don if he had any "insider" knowledge as a Nevada resident as to what happened in the Reid / Angle race. I hear that Reid may have stolen the election.
Did Reid Steal Nevada?
Westside, I also personally invested in Rand Paul's campaign. I believe in his principals because I believe in his father, who defines the word patriot. It is truly amazing that we have elected a LIBERTARIAN / CONSTITUTIONALISTS to the Senate. Just 2 years ago I thought this was impossible.
I wanted to ask Don if he had any "insider" knowledge as a Nevada resident as to what happened in the Reid / Angle race. I hear that Reid may have stolen the election.
Did Reid Steal Nevada?
FootballDad
Hall of Famer
Don Wassall I was hoping for Greene to win. It'd be kind of cool to have a genuine nut in the Senate. [/QUOTE said:What, Al Franken isn't nutty enough for you?Edited by: FootballDad
Freethinker said:
I don't know if it was stolen or not. The polls right before the election had Angle ahead by 4 percentage points, so to lose to Reid by 5% was certainly quite surprising. The daily rag attributed it to fevered attempts in the past week to get minorities and union members out to vote, and that could well be what turned it. Unfortunately, Nevada is part of "Aztlan" and Las Vegas and Clark County, which have the bulk of the state's population, are very multiracial. And the large number of unionized workers in government, construction, and some of the casinos make that overwhelmingly Democrat bloc of voters more significant in Nevada than just about any other state.
What the hell happened to the borders on this thread?
whiteathlete33
Hall of Famer
Don Wassall said:What the hell happened to the borders on this thread?
<div></div>
LOL!! I thought it was only my computer.
Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
whiteathlete33 said:Don Wassall said:What the hell happened to the borders on this thread?
<div></div>
LOL!! I thought it was only my computer.
I was just wondering the same thing. Never seen anything like it before.
If the thread makes it to another page, hopefully it will look normal again.
referendum
Mentor
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2005
- Messages
- 1,687
My number one issue is immigration, and on that front I believe last night was very positive. According to numbers usa, the big chunk of the new GOP house members are against amnesty, and some of them for less legal immigration as well. In the upcoming lame duck congress Harry Reid has promised to try to push through the dream act, to legalize illegal aliens who promise to go to college or join the military. It was defeated in September, and hopefully will again.
Perhaps we've been a bit too pssimistic lately. We have a long way to go, but the elections have definitely given us a boost, especially in the immigration battle.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/11/05/the-avalanche/#more-6019
The Avalanche
Nov 5th, 2010 by Hunter Wallace
(snip)
Who benefits?
Roy Beck of NumbersUSA:
"I'm not sure there has been a Congress since 1924 â€" and certainly not in the last 50 years â€" that had a membership more interested in reductions in overall illegal and legal immigration than will be the one that was elected yesterday."Â
The most restrictionist Congress since 1924. Doesn't that really say it all?
IN THE HOUSE
1. They wiped out a net of three dozen More-Immigration seats in the House.
2. They knocked the number of More-Immigration seats down to about 170, far below the 218 majority needed to pass legislation, seemingly eradicating any possibility of "comprehensive immigration reform"Â being considered in the next Congress.
3. They didn't just go for mild enforcement types. They filled about two dozen of those current More-Immigration seats with Less-Immigration candidates who made explicit promises not only to push stringent enforcement measures but also promised to work to eliminate several categories of legal immigration.
4. The number of elected Less-Immigration candidates promising stepped-up immigration enforcement looks like it will fall just short of the 218 majority. But most of the final 50 elected candidates classified as Uncommitted appear likely to lean toward more enforcement if presented opportunities and requirements to vote on it. There is no question that a solid pro-enforcement, bi-partisan majority will exist in the new House.
IN THE SENATE
1. Five or six of the Senate's most aggressive More-Immigration Members were replaced by Less-Immigration candidates.
2. That shift puts the More-Immigration bloc about 10 votes short of stopping a filibuster and creates a virtual 50-50 deadlock in the Senate.
(snip)
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/11/05/the-avalanche/#more-6019
The Avalanche
Nov 5th, 2010 by Hunter Wallace
(snip)
Who benefits?
Roy Beck of NumbersUSA:
"I'm not sure there has been a Congress since 1924 â€" and certainly not in the last 50 years â€" that had a membership more interested in reductions in overall illegal and legal immigration than will be the one that was elected yesterday."Â
The most restrictionist Congress since 1924. Doesn't that really say it all?
IN THE HOUSE
1. They wiped out a net of three dozen More-Immigration seats in the House.
2. They knocked the number of More-Immigration seats down to about 170, far below the 218 majority needed to pass legislation, seemingly eradicating any possibility of "comprehensive immigration reform"Â being considered in the next Congress.
3. They didn't just go for mild enforcement types. They filled about two dozen of those current More-Immigration seats with Less-Immigration candidates who made explicit promises not only to push stringent enforcement measures but also promised to work to eliminate several categories of legal immigration.
4. The number of elected Less-Immigration candidates promising stepped-up immigration enforcement looks like it will fall just short of the 218 majority. But most of the final 50 elected candidates classified as Uncommitted appear likely to lean toward more enforcement if presented opportunities and requirements to vote on it. There is no question that a solid pro-enforcement, bi-partisan majority will exist in the new House.
IN THE SENATE
1. Five or six of the Senate's most aggressive More-Immigration Members were replaced by Less-Immigration candidates.
2. That shift puts the More-Immigration bloc about 10 votes short of stopping a filibuster and creates a virtual 50-50 deadlock in the Senate.
(snip)