White_Savage said:
JD:
I believe they actually do something like that in China.
But who are we kidding? The American public likes the slam dunk too much for that.
I agree, it'll never happen. I also think that the game would be better without the 3-point line, but people like that too much to ever get rid of that either. The 3 point line practically forces the best shooters to camp out 25 feet away from the basket; I can't imagine the NBA game not being a smoother, more efficient game without a 3 point line, or a shorter one. The NBA experimented with a shorter 3 point line for a season or two in the 90's, but I guess they didn't like it. "Too easy," apparently. Sports have to be as painful and difficult as possible.
Another cool change would be limiting the number of dribbles a player could take. Perhaps the ref could start counting dribbles once the ball handler crosses the half-court line. I know, outlandish, will never happen.
Also, going back to two refs, instead of three, would be nice. And limiting the number of time-outs at the end of a game would be fantastic. A basketball game slows down just when it's supposed to get exciting. Duh. Maybe something like: no time-outs during the final two minutes. A bonus would be that players might have to actually think for themselves out there. Whenever I see players try to create for themselves at the end of a game, without a time out to allow the coach to diagram a play, they just dribble around for awhile and then take a terrible shot.
One more: the NBA season is way too long. Nobody pays attention at the beginning of the season because of football anyway. They should start a month later. But of course that means less revenue, so that'll never happen either.
Edited by: JD074