Recent content by SprintFan

Sorry for this post but if you want to see me in action...sadly this is the only recorded sequence with me running because I got a very bad injury at knee(surgery 6 month's out)....skip to 26sec I'm in orange(the striker) this is very bad filmed(my uncle) ,very bad pitch, we had a friendly...

So I had 2 oppinions about Walcott's FAT time over 60m 7.00sec and 6.90-7.30sec other oppinions?

What do you mean with "on the leaving of the start line"....do they use hand/foot pad device on start I didnt notice them...the finish is pretty clear with sensors(so electronically) but the start is unclear and we have 3 possibilities 1. hand/foot pad device which triggers the time as they...

I understand so the only difference would be this to be FAT....but if you add approximately 0.2sec for reaction time than it would be like FAT timing am I right? What I wanted to know is if this device is accurate enough leaving out reaction time altough it has start on voice, the timer starts...

http://www.probotics.org/SonicTimer/SonicTimer.htm Is this timing device something you call FAT(fully automatic timing)? It has hand start pad and laser finish sensor is it the same with Brower and Sparq and other more known timing devices?

waterbed are you dutch? what other dutch soccer players do you know with their sprint times? Overmars was one of the fastest...it;s comparable to Walcott but they both played at Arsenal and Walcott is the record holder for the 40m sprint

wow 7.24 at 44 that's impressive quite incredible...I tought soccer is not that popular in N America and that you dont follow that's why I asked didn't mean to seem suspicious:P what would Walcott's time be in the 40 yard dash? I would quess somewhere around 4.35-4.40 with the timing used in the...

Your oppinion is based on the youtube clips or you watch soccer regularly? thanks for sharing your oppinion with us

no it's correct the way I calculated if I ran 50m 6.5sec FAT without reaction time my 60m in a meeting would be 7.8secbecause you add reaction time 0.15-0.2(i have no idea) and the 10m n 0.1-0.15 we are a little off topic but what do you think of Walcott's 40m sprint record time of 4,72sec this...

I am not that fast 6.09sec was hand timed over 50m but almost 4 years ago when still playing soccer but now I have bought sonic timer with hand start pad and laser finish sensor and I ran 6,5sec on 50m that will be equivalent to a 7,8sec 60m with blocks reaction time and all that stuff so not...

my oppinion is that in the first video the 2 soccer players run 50m approx or maybe less because the 1 player takes 11 steps untill the first line of the I dont know the word in english and it is at a distance of 16,5m(I know because I'm a soccer referee) but not all pitches have 100m its...

nice post waterbed but do you really think blum lost to that soccer player? I myself played soccer 12 years untill 19 years when my knees got seriosly injured i sytill have problems with them and I remember not knowing almost nothing about track and field but beeing pretty quick for short...

Is this subject really so uninteresting for you? I was hoping for some oppinions....

I was just wondering what is your oppinion about one of the fastest football player....He ran 4.72 sec over 40m(an all time Arsenal record beating Henry"s old record of 4.84sec) I dont know the timing method used but I can guess that it was something similar to this...

He has great stride length(42 steps) impressive for his age but his drive phase seems to short in comparison with elite sprinters like asafa, bolt etc