Why Support the White Athlete?

administrator

Administrator
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
60
J. B.'s latest:
Why Support the White Athlete?


What's so special about the anti-white Caste System in sports that one should risk public ridicule opposing it? The answer is simple: Sports represent how we see our selves as a people and illustrate the values we hold important as a culture. When people describe the fall of the Roman Empire they typically describe the depravity of the entertainment in the Coliseum as the most visual and obvious sign of a nation that was headed to extinction. If the current state of our "games" is any indication, we are on the same path.


At one time American society was well ordered. Not perfect by any means, but by and large its basic structures and institutions made sense and commanded respect. Not so long ago the very concept of "America" had real meaning and stood for something that was understood by nearly everybody as something good.


Not any more. Many people find themselves adrift in the place that America has become. It is a land of many laws but much lawlessness, of many churches but little religion, of many people but no longer a single nation. The thing that America was, is no longer. It has become a tired brand name that politicians trot out as if the mere mention of the name was enough. But it is not.


The reason that America is different is that it is no longer a white led nation. Sure, a lot of power and influence is still controlled by white people. But those people do not govern or behave in the manner that has always been typical of our people. They have adapted a way of life and a belief system that seems wrong to many of us.


At one time the men that ran our sports, and our media, government and corporations were all cut from the same cloth  they were White Christian men. And the Christian part was genuine, for they were raised in an era when to believe in God was to actually "believe" in God. The people that run our institutions now are often not white, frequently not men, and certainly not Christian.


And as our institutions have changed so have our sports. The qualities that we valued as Americans were once represented in our sports. The players and athletes were not mere entertainers but represented the type of person we wished to see celebrated and held up as role models for our children and others.


As an example, baseball was once considered our national pastime and helped define us as a people. Only Americans played it and nearly all of us did. Rich and poor, black and white, we all grew up on ball fields learning to love the game. It was how we played as kids, absent video games and TV. In a world where sex was for adults, violence was frowned upon and drugs were unknown, it provided the structure of our world.


Baseball for children in America is now a game played exclusively in leagues, with parental support at every turn. Practice is seven days a week and travel to games on weekends. In the major leagues there are hispanics and Asians and a few blacks. The game is no longer special now. It does not define us as a people, unless the definition is eventual extinction. Like the faded concept of America, the popularity of the game plays on its long dead tradition.


White people have settled in different places on the globe and in those places have established the same kind of societies as the ones they left behind. Why? Because the morals and standards of those societies are the ones that have been developed by our people over the centuries to aid in our survival.


Similarly, the conditions in Africa throughout the ages have shaped and formed the genetic code of the people native to that land. The qualities that we find good in the descendents of Africa and those that we find not so good are a result of the physical and social evolution of their native habitat.


For example, Africans have a high infant mortality rate. The only way for such a group to survive would be to have lots and lots of children. This would have the effect of making members of the group genetically selected for fertility.


This environmentally positive attribute would appear different in an environment where infant morality was greatly reduced (by the technological advances of white society). In that environment excessive reproductive behavior would lead to undesirable consequences such as unwanted or unsupportable births, sexually transmitted diseases, and other problems that are a matter of social and moral concern.


The same could be said about levels of aggression. A group that found itself in constant tribal struggles would become very warlike and violent. Those are survival advantages in an environment of many small tribes warring over scarce resources, but are disadvantages in civilized areas where violent resolution of disputes causes full prisons and social chaos.


Developing in a tropical climate there was little need for Africans to follow the progress of the stars in the sky so as to be able to track the change of seasons. This created little need for math skills or for the record keeping to track such changes. It was not necessary to plan far into the future to foresee a coming winter and the preparations needed to survive through harsh weather. No great need for math or for a written language to record information arose. And thus the natives of sub-Saharan Africa never developed either and to this day have little knack for them.


IQ is extremely heritable, the IQ of a child can be very accurately predicted knowing the IQ of the parents. It is well established that more intelligent people practice better moral lives from a social viewpoint. It may be unfortunate that evolutionary pressures in Africa poorly prepared blacks for survival in large modern technological societies, but no matter. That is how it is and how it will remain.


Thus each race forms a social and moral set of values to aid in its survival in the particular environment that it evolves in. When the group goes to another environment it brings with it the qualities it used to survive in the old environment.


For whites to survive and thrive it is necessary for us to create societies that reproduce those places where the morality of our ancestors was formed and written into our genetic programming. If we allow our lands to be overrun by non-whites with different ideas of proper social formations then we are by nature doomed.


It is not that there are no blacks that have common social and moral values with whites. Many do. It is just that so many do not. Unless black society, or blacks in white society, are forced to live by the morality of white society then they will eventually create replicas of Mogadishu, Haiti, and Detroit. This is not good for us; or for them either.


At one time white society did severely regulate black behavior. And black and white societies thrived together while apart from each other in America. Now however whites impose absolutely no restrictions on black society and have completely surrendered and instead support, appease, and celebrate, the dysfunctions of the current black social structure.


All of us are the descendants of human bloodlines that had a tremendous will to live. Encoded in our DNA is the programming that we need to survive to our fullest extent. Each subgroup of humanity developed in a similar manner but differently, in response to the demands of their own particular environment. Complex social mores, philosophies, and religions were enacted to best accentuate the particular needs and strong points of each people. Their DNA was programmed over thousands of generations to a style of living that was adapted to fit them and was encoded in every cell in their body.


If white people in their settled lands allow other cultures to dominate they are surrendering the very thing that has insured their survival. Furthermore they become outcasts in their own homelands. And make no mistake, you can forget what historic revisionists may try and teach about white settled lands. Our lands were not stolen from anybody, they were mostly barren, open territory that was settled and brought to prosperity by the hard work of millions and millions of our forefathers and mothers. This is an investment they made for their progeny that is no different then the one made by metizos in Mexico or Africans in the Congo.


The United States is our land. If we wish to keep it we will have to fight for it. Not with weapons but with the choices we make to support our people and culture. The other option is to surrender and support the culture of other people. This is cultural and eventual racial suicide. It is also cowardly. If we are not strong enough to protest that our men be treated fairly in sports, to demand that there be a place for them in the games we love, then we have capitulated another very important cultural survival mechanism to the enemy.


Nature punishes cowardice and weakness by removing it from existence. That makes it easy for anyone who has the intelligence to understand the struggle we are under to decide for themselves what will be their choice. Fight against the Caste System that is part of the strategy of others to seize cultural dominance. The end result of surrender and appeasement is easy to see. It is written throughout history. The choice is ours to make.
 
G

Guest

Guest
What might help in some manner is adopting part of the Jewish culture of critique. By using the methodology of our racial enemies we might help create some breathing space. What I have tried to do for years is change the basic mindset of anyone concerned about whites, and that is that whites are not the dominant race anymore and we need to stop being reactionary and stuck on defense all the time. The South African Boer being the best example, it seems literally they think with the right set of miracles that the National Party will reappear out of the mists of time and set it straight. I find the series Battle Star Galactica to be instructive to our fates where the not so great mass of people just want to go back to the old days and its leaders being just able to stay above water and not being able to convey a sense of "Race" that their forefathers once did. We need to convey a sense of Spengler's meaning of Race.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Another great article JB! Hopefully some visitors to the site will read this and the light will go on in their head.
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
Colonel_Reb said:
Another great article JB! Hopefully some visitors to the site will read this and the light will go on in their head.


Yes Colonel, it is another great article. As I was reading it a thought came to me out of the ether. Wouldn't it be nice if more people had access to these JB pieces. It would be so cool if someone with an excellent speaking voice and pleasant persona would record all of these articles and present them to the audience of -Youtube- for example. Every week or so one of his previous articles could be disseminated. It would be fabulous. Imagine the voices ofCharlton Heston or Orson Welles reading the lines.
 

Solomon Kane

Mentor
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
783
"At one time the men that ran our sports, and our media, government and corporations were all cut from the same cloth â€â€￾ they were White Christian men. And the Christian part was genuine, for they were raised in an era when to believe in God was to actually "believe" in God. The people that run our institutions now are often not white, frequently not men, and certainly not Christian."

--JB Cash

Yeah, this is so true, and its a point also made in Pat Buchanan's new book on Immigration ("Emergency"). Pat quotes traditionalist conservatives (and even old liberal commentators) to the effect that a nation needs an "ethno-cultural core" around which the national idea can coalesce and be sustained. This core once was indeed white, christian men. But they have been swept away by feminism, the angry black man, the invading hispanic immigrant, and by (sorry, but I have to take notice of the 1000 pound gorilla in the living room) Jewish power and influence (cf. Hollywood, Higher Education, the Press, and High Finance). The most infuriating thing is that all of this was unecessary. White Christian men were in a position of relative unity and definite strength in the 1950's. Had they cultivated and stengthened that sense of solidarity, instead of dissolving it through an irrational guilt trip over "the negro problem", "our failure to help the Jews", "southern racism", "the poverty of the third world", etc., etc., we would still be in a half-way decent position.

"A people remarkably similar in manner, customs, race, and religion"--John Jay, founding Father, The Federalist. He was speaking about the American people.
 

Weltner

Guru
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
224
Location
United States
Why Support The White Athlete?

Simply put:

Whites INVENTED THEM,blacks didn't,never,ever could have.Why could they never have?

Simply put:BECAUSE THEY'RE BLACK,and blacks have never created anything - ever,end of story!!!!And since they never could have invented them,they should never have been allowed or entitled to play them - ever,END OF STORY!!!!
 
Top