Wow - There is something rotten in t̶h̶e̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶D̶e̶n̶m̶a̶r̶k̶ Sandy Hook!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
So what do you believe?

A) Sandy Hook shooting never took place, it was all staged and no one was shot.

B) Sandy Hook shooting happened but not with Adam Lanza or else some combination of Lanza and other unknown perps?

I can't get a fix on what kind of a conspiracy you are alleging. You say no evidence of shooting blah blah blah, no video, no bullet holes, Lanza died the day before. etc.

If A) Okay then why are guys running from the scene, how were hundreds to thousands of people convinced to fake the treatment of dozens of kids that were killed and attend funerals for non existent victims? Where are those kids that were not killed now? What about the teacher/s that were alleged to have died? Where are they now, if not dead?

If B) kids WERE killed but by govt agents, or some other nefarious murder squad that figured it would be a good idea to gin up support for a gun control bill by having specially trained assassins kill a bunch of little kids at a elementary school. (an idea that seems to have failed miserably in the Senate-by the way). So why are parents so happy? The kids still got killed, it might have not been by Lanza but I would think that would be precious little solace to the parents of a dead child.

So tell me A or B?
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
"The kids still got killed, it might have not been by Lanza but I would think that would be precious little solace to the parents of a dead child."

So tell me A or B?


"I haven't seen any actual evidence of any dead children, or grownup either, including Adam Lanza. As far as I know no local hospital received any dead or wounded - and they claim that 90 pound bug eyed nerd who never left his mom's basement was somehow so deadly with his handguns that he not only shot through the school's bullet proof door but he left no wounded except for one allegedly wounded person who was not even named. As one of those films drolly noted at the end, "no children were harmed in the making of this movie".

The medical examiner thought it was a laugh riot too, as he too was breaking up in giggles, and the kids that were interviewed when asked what they heard mentioned someone trying to get in the door. Nothing about all those hundreds of bullets going off indoors that they claim happened and which would be the number one thing they'd remember and their ears and head would be ringing still from the extremely loud noise.

So what am I saying? I'm saying that from beginning to end, from that blubbering idiot Gene Rosen and his ever changing and totally senseless story to the happy parents to president Barry's ready to roll anti-gun road show to the pre-prepared attack on legal gun owners that that Westchester newspaper put into effect just days after this staged incident occurred, to the "drills" for the very thing going on the very day in the very next town - same as 911 and 77 in London and Boston!!! - it doesn't ring true, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't hold water. They are lying. They are not telling us the truth. That's what I'm saying. I don't know all the details, same as 911. I don't know all the details about what actually happened on 911, but what I do know - and I know this with absolute 100% certainty! - is that they are lying about what happened on 911. They are lying through their teeth about what happened on 911. They lie about everything.

ww


George Ade, 19th century American humorist:

"He had been kicked in the head by a mule when he was young and after that he believed everything he read in the Sunday papers."
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
"I haven't seen any actual evidence of any dead children, or grownup either, including Adam Lanza. As far as I know no local hospital received any dead or wounded - and they claim that 90 pound bug eyed nerd who never left his mom's basement was somehow so deadly with his handguns that he not only shot through the school's bullet proof door but he left no wounded except for one allegedly wounded person who was not even named. As one of those films drolly noted at the end, "no children were harmed in the making of this movie".

The medical examiner thought it was a laugh riot too, as he too was breaking up in giggles, and the kids that were interviewed when asked what they heard mentioned someone trying to get in the door. Nothing about all those hundreds of bullets going off indoors that they claim happened and which would be the number one thing they'd remember and their ears and head would be ringing still from the extremely loud noise.

So what am I saying? I'm saying that from beginning to end, from that blubbering idiot Gene Rosen and his ever changing and totally senseless story to the happy parents to president Barry's ready to roll anti-gun road show to the pre-prepared attack on legal gun owners that that Westchester newspaper put into effect just days after this staged incident occurred, to the "drills" for the very thing going on the very day in the very next town - same as 911 and 77 in London and Boston!!! - it doesn't ring true, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't hold water. They are lying. They are not telling us the truth. That's what I'm saying. I don't know all the details, same as 911. I don't know all the details about what actually happened on 911, but what I do know - and I know this with absolute 100% certainty! - is that they are lying about what happened on 911. They are lying through their teeth about what happened on 911. They lie about everything.

ww


George Ade, 19th century American humorist:

"He had been kicked in the head by a mule when he was young and after that he believed everything he read in the Sunday papers."

OK so "A". No children got shot. Where are they now? Is it your belief that they never existed and the parents are actors hired to be their imaginary parents? If that were true why wouldn't they be over the top crying and carrying on about their dead (non-existent) children. What kind of poor actors is the federal govt getting for it's money when you have the hired parents of (fake) dead children laughing it up when they are supposed to be selling the (fake) death of their kids to the public and media!! Outrageous.

However you can do a search for interviews with parents on various news shows, Oprah, 60-mins. etc. lots of tears there. I guess they were better actors. Plenty of pictures and video of the kids before they were "killed". I guess they decided to do a better job with the faking.

You want to see evidence? What does that mean? You want to see a picture of a dead body? But pictures can be faked of course. I don't know what kind of evidence would convince you? There were admissions to the local hospital, funerals by the local morticians. The daughter of the teacher that was shot is doing the rounds on TV right now calling for more gun control.

If you are certain it is all lies then by that very statement it means there is nothing that could be presented to you that would change your mind. So evidence would make no difference to you.

I think for the purposes of conspiracy it would be more likely that the kids were killed and the real story is something else then the Adam Lanza one. That would be easier to sell and logistics wise much more simple for the PTB to set up. You should pick "B" instead. Drop all the talk about no bodies, no wounded, no video, etc. and concentrate on there being another killer or killers, like on the grassy knoll, look how successful that conspiracy theme has been.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
"If you are certain it is all lies then by that very statement it means there is nothing that could be presented to you that would change your mind. So evidence would make no difference to you."


What are you talking about? Are you trying to do a double talk routine? I said that the evidence and lack of evidence that I have seen and have not seen leads me to believe that they are lying about what happened at Sandy Hoax elementary school, and I gave my reasons for saying it over and over, and I don't see where you are addressing, or even paying any attention to, that evidence at all, like the link at the bottom of post #200 for instance.

"You want to see evidence? What does that mean? You want to see a picture of a dead body?"



How about photo evidence from inside the school showing the damage from all those bullets and forensic evidence showing what calibre they were including photos (note that they sealed the school up tight and fenced it off so no one can go near it or look inside and they are probably going to quickly demolish it ,ie get rid of the evidence, just as they did to the OK City Federal building and the WTC, "to start the healing process", and any evidence that Adam Lanza was even alive after 2009, and an explanation for the two men in the woods and the crazy ever changing Gene Rosen stories and the what happened to the brother Ryan Lanza who was all over the news at the beginning until the relatives said he was an imposter and then poof he vanished from the news too, and an explanation for how come Lanza's mother was a teacher at that school and then she became not a teacher at that school and how come the surviving kids or teachers didn't mention hearing any gunshots and why did they tell us he was using an "assault rifle" and then changed the story to hand guns and then back again, and how come no local NJ gun store or shooting range ever heard of or saw "gun nut" Mrs Lanza, and how come there are no kids being evacuated in the aerial photos, and how come there isn't a photo or any other evidence of even one dead body and how come the police and emergency personnel were aimlessly milling around the fire house and how come there were no frantic and hysterical parents trying to get to the school and these are just a few things that come to mind.



ww
 
Last edited:

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
"How about photo evidence from inside the school showing the damage from all those bullets and forensic evidence showing what calibre they were including photos (note that they sealed the school up tight and fenced it off so no one can go near it or look inside and they are probably going to quickly demolish it ,ie get rid of the evidence, just as they did to the OK City Federal building and the WTC, "to start the healing process", and any evidence that Adam Lanza was even alive after 2009, and an explanation for the two men in the woods and the crazy ever changing Gene Rosen stories and the what happened to the brother Ryan Lanza who was all over the news at the beginning until the relatives said he was an imposter and then poof he vanished from the news too, and an explanation for how come Lanza's mother was a teacher at that school and then she became not a teacher at that school and how come the surviving kids or teachers didn't mention hearing any gunshots and why did they tell us he was using an "assault rifle" and then changed the story to hand guns and then back again, and how come no local NJ gun store or shooting range ever heard of or saw "gun nut" Mrs Lanza, and how come there are no kids being evacuated in the aerial photos, and how come there isn't a photo or any other evidence of even one dead body and how come the police and emergency personnel were aimlessly milling around the fire house and how come there were no frantic and hysterical parents trying to get to the school and these are just a few things that come to mind.
ww

1) there is never any forensic information released for crimes of this type. Have you ever seen photo's from inside a building of bullet holes and damage? No because this is evidence in a criminal trial. What is the point of pictures of bullet holes anyway? How hard would that be to fake?

2) crime scenes are sealed off. Always. It's how investigations are done.

3) the school is closed because of the obvious trauma that opening it would be for the teachers, parents, and students. They have opened another school for them.

4) Ryan Lanza is Adam Lanza's brother and he is still around, don't know why you think otherwise.

5) the reports about Lanza's mother was initial media incorrect information and was corrected as soon as it was found to be wrong.

6) where would you expect to see a photo of a dead body? I have buried two parents, I don't have any photo's of them after they passed away. Do you have photo's of dead people? I can't remember seeing many pictures of dead people in caskets. That would be extremely insensitive to take a picture of a child that was perhaps disfigured in the shooting. Lanza probably walked up and shot them in the head.

7) emergency personnel were mobilized right after it happened. I don't know where you get the idea that they weren't. There was not a big need for doctors and ambulances as the kids were almost all dead at the scene. They don't rush people with their brains blown out to the hospital. They take them to the morgue.

8) there were plenty of frantic parents. In fact the guy in the police car, who figures prominently in the conspiracy theories was in fact a frantic parent, Christopher Manfredonia, that was visiting the school to help his kid with a project and frantically tried to get into the school after the incident. He was questioned and released.

I think a little googling would get answers to your questions, instead of youtube videos that claim otherwise.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
Ignored again:



It's getting hard to find unedited vid of the two men being chased down in the woods with audio as they are apparently disappearing a lot of the videos. You can find it here starting ~ 13:50:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EwIvy1GXRU


This film was never shown on tv again, and its not even mentioned in the official story line.





"emergency personnel were mobilized right after it happened..."


Here's live helicopter footageof what's going on - or not going on - on the Sandy Hoax movie set:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnpBAjTap3s






just-laughing.jpg


Distraught Sandy Hoax parent the day after his little daughter was murdered.




Here's another website with lots of material on the Sandy Hoax:

http://atruthsoldier.wordpress.com/sandy-hook-hoax/


But there is a lot of material all over the internet on it, even though some of the films linked above have been disappeared by Youtube. You just need to shut off your tv and open your eyes and ears and mind.

But you can believe whatever you want to believe and listen to the friendly talking heads and the leering politicians in their eight thousand dollar suits on your tv set. I don't care. They wouldn't lie to you.




ww
 
Last edited:

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
"Sandy Hoax". A Barry Soetoro film production. No children were harmed in the making of this movie.
 
Last edited:

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
From Menelik's shill website on a thread entitled "Debunked: Sandy Hook: The Man in The Woods":

"I'm not seeing anyone getting arrested.
You see 3 men start to run into the woods, sort of spread out like they're after someone, but then slow down and start walking in the same direction. The clip ends there."



THIS is why they are trying to disappear all the original uncut videos with sound that show the two men being chased down in the woods and then captured - and shown on tv only one time.

I'm going to download the full version before they disappear them all.
 

Menelik

Mentor
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
1,175
Location
Georgia
"shill" website? The same can be said for your sites but I'll try not to engage in ad hominem attacks; its the truth we're after isn't it? Here's another quote but since it doesn't support your theory I'm not surprised that you didn't use it:
"The second reported man turned out to be a cop out of uniform. What exactly is unlikely about that?" Btw how does one go about making videos "disappear" from the internet?
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997

"The second reported man turned out to be a cop out of uniform."

What was "a cop out of uniform" doing running away through the woods with police in full pursuit and then put on the ground, "proned out", and handcuffed?

They tried to totally disappear this from the news but honest peoiple on the internet are calling them out.

Police seem to have apprehended two (2) men outside the school. Tapes analyzed here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuhbCOqIaC4


"What exactly is unlikely about that?" Btw how does one go about making videos "disappear" from the internet?"


YouTube simply removes them, as you can see by clicking on some of the links in this very thread. Politically incorrect material is constantly being disappeared, take that 4-part FOX tv special on "Israeli spying and 911", for instance.

And I don't click on random links you're spamming the joint up with. If you've got something to say put it in your own words.
 
Last edited:

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Btw how does one go about making videos "disappear" from the internet?"

YouTube simply removes them, as you can see by clicking on some of the links in this very thread. Politically incorrect material is constantly being disappeared, take that 4-part FOX tv special on "Israeli spying and 911", for instance.

And I don't click on random links you're spamming the joint up with. If you've got something to say put it in your own words.

I'm sure you realize that just because youtube doesn't allow a video that it's not "disappeared". There are probably a hundred or more video posting sites. Don't be such a follower of the system and only consider the govt controlled giant "youtube" site as the lone source of video information exchange.

You don't click on random links??!! That's rich. You post dozens of links yourself but don't want to click on someone elses? And accusing someone else of spamming the joint up? With your multiple posts on the same subject that no one replies to? :smash:
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
1,016

"The second reported man turned out to be a cop out of uniform."

What was "a cop out of uniform" doing running away through the woods with police in full pursuit and then put on the ground, "proned out", and handcuffed?


At least to me, that is the weirdest thing about the entire incident. What was he doing there? Why did he run? Why was the original report that he was the brother of Adam Lanza? There's a lot of weirdness, but that guy isn't imaginary, and his behavior cannot be explained.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
At least to me, that is the weirdest thing about the entire incident. What was he doing there? Why did he run? Why was the original report that he was the brother of Adam Lanza? There's a lot of weirdness, but that guy isn't imaginary, and his behavior cannot be explained.

According to the police tapes above there was more than one man in the woods.

You won't see a word about this on the controlled mass media, only on the internet where people ask questions - and they've got their canon fodders so well trained that they get mad at you if you ask questions that they can't answer...as above. They've got them trained to sit in front of their tv's and shout "USA!".

There are A LOT of weird and unexplained things here. You mention alleged Adam Lanza's brother, Ryan, who was all over the news at the beginning, and then they said that Adam used his bro's id and that's why they confused them - but his brother hadn't seen Adam in years - nor has anyone else, not since 2009! And then the news ran articles - you can google it, it was on the mass media - that the Lanza relatives said that Ryan Lanza was an imposter - and then not one single word again about Ryan Lanza anyplace!

How about showing us a photo from the school's surveillance cameras showing us this 90 pound bug eyed ubernerd who never left his basement shooting out the school's BULLETPROOF front door?! How about showing us ANYTHING?
 

Menelik

Mentor
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
1,175
Location
Georgia
According to the police tapes above there was more than one man in the woods.

You won't see a word about this on the controlled mass media, only on the internet where people ask questions - and they've got their canon fodders so well trained that they get mad at you if you ask questions that they can't answer...as above. They've got them trained to sit in front of their tv's and shout "USA!".

There are A LOT of weird and unexplained things here. You mention alleged Adam Lanza's brother, Ryan, who was all over the news at the beginning, and then they said that Adam used his bro's id and that's why they confused them - but his brother hadn't seen Adam in years - nor has anyone else, not since 2009! And then the news ran articles - you can google it, it was on the mass media - that the Lanza relatives said that Ryan Lanza was an imposter - and then not one single word again about Ryan Lanza anyplace!

How about showing us a photo from the school's surveillance cameras showing us this 90 pound bug eyed ubernerd who never left his basement shooting out the school's BULLETPROOF front door?! How about showing us ANYTHING?

tinfoil-hat.jpg
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
Werewolf said:
How about showing us a photo from the school's surveillance cameras showing us this 90 pound bug eyed ubernerd who never left his basement shooting out the school's BULLETPROOF front door?! How about showing us ANYTHING?


I agree with Jaxvid that there is a perfectly logical explanation for not showing photographs of the corpses of dead children and staff (particularly at their funerals) from Sandy Hook. However, like Mohammed Atta and his cave-dwelling crew of “Muslim Hijackers” are never actually shown (in any of the instantly-destroyed airport surveillance videos) boarding the airplanes that razed the WTC buildings and the pentagon...what is the harm in showing surveillance stills of Adam Lanza stalking the entrance of Sandy Hook elementary? If nothing else, it would help the All-Kosher media to further instill the fact that this gay-looking little waif that hadn’t been seen by his neighbors, friends, or family (aside from his mother, whom he conveniently murdered that morning) since some three years prior, was every bit as sadistic as they foretold…

151690-004-36762ADA.jpg

CAPTION: Atta Boards a Plane in Maine, Not Boston

Unlike Atta, with Lanza, there isn’t even a lame, deceptive surveillance photo of him milling around the outside of the Sandy Hook building. What’s the harm in releasing a photo of the alleged “7’ long X 4’ wide spreadsheet chronicling past mass murders” that Lanza allegedly created on his computer? What’s the harm in showing us Lanza’s “video game dungeon” in which he played violent first-person shooter games 24-7? What’s the harm in showing the car he used parked in the parking lot that morning? What’s the harm in showing Lanza’s dead body, either at the scene of the crime or in the coroner’s office?

My thoughts on what really occurred at Sandy Hook are that the children and staff did actually die, but that this little wussy (third from the right in the top row) had nothing to do with it…

Adam-Lanza_2429494b.jpg

CAPTION: Lanza in his High School Audio-Visual Club

The question is, why would they choose to frame someone like Adam Lanza? Aside from a few former classmates calling him “nerdy” and “kinda weird,” he had no history of cruel or violent behavior or even a “political footprint” online. Is it because he lived near Sandy Hook? Because he was a socially-inept loser who never held a job, had no close friends, and was homeschooled by his gun-toting mother after middle school…and therefore knew the fewest amount of people who could establish his true character after the framing?

And if Lanza never really died, or died years prior, then what do we make of this story...

HARTFORD, Conn. — A Connecticut medical examiner's office employee accused of letting her husband see the body of the Newtown school shooter has been fired.
Chief Medical Examiner Dr. H. Wayne Carver, in a dismissal letter to Jean Henry released Friday, wrote that bringing her husband into the morgue in December violated the agency's ethical mission and showed "extremely poor judgment."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...am-lanza-body-article-1.1328962#ixzz2SiYFUC6I

Nobody knows...and thanks to our technically-advanced media that prides itself on “reporting” every conceivable detail, at lightning speed…but goes deaf, dumb, and mute when details actually matter.
 
Last edited:

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
How about showing us a photo from the school's surveillance cameras showing us this 90 pound bug eyed ubernerd who never left his basement shooting out the school's BULLETPROOF front door?! How about showing us ANYTHING?

where did you read it was bulletproof? here's a link where they say it wasn't: http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20130313/ESN06/303130052/A-Hardwire-shield-safety?nclick_check=1

regarding the absence of pictures from lanza at the school, it might come a little later
to take a very recent and close example, when mohamed merah killed jewish children and was then killed by the police in france, no images were shown, so the conspiracy theories started
but months later, the media showed some images, and even records of the negociations between the special forces and the killer while he was hiding in his apartment
3 months after, they even showed a picture of the dead body of mohamed merah, taken right after his death
but the media showed this, not the state or the police, and they did it against the law i think
they did it to prove the conspiracy theories wrong
so maybe in a few months you'll have those pictures
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,997
where did you read it was bulletproof? here's a link where they say it wasn't: http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20130313/ESN06/303130052/A-Hardwire-shield-safety?nclick_check=1

Attorney says the Sandy Hoax elementary school was supposed to have had bulletproof glass on the front door:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3GGXJDZbRA

But hey that was no obstacle to Adam Super-Lanza who shot his way right through with his "assault rifle" - woops, make that 4 handguns - the story was changed - and then Adam Super-Lanza who apparently never left his basement and never shot a gun in his life and looks like he coudn't even hold a gun up in front of him, and he probably passed away in 2009, went all the way up to CT to shoot up his mother's school where she worked as a teacher - woops, scratch that the story was changed, she didn't work there after all - and single handedly managed to shoot up the entire school with a virtually 100% kill ratio...but hey, it must all be true, it was on telavision, and President Barry and Joe Biden said it happened too.

regarding the absence of pictures from lanza at the school, it might come a little later...



Of course. I understand. You can't expect the FBI or CIA media dept. to do a nice photoshop job overnight.




ww
 
Last edited:

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Attorney says the Sandy Hoax elementary school was supposed to have had bulletproof glass on the front door:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3GGXJDZbRA

But hey that was no obstacle to Adam Super-Lanza who shot his way right through with his "assault rifle" - woops, make that 4 handguns - the story was changed - and then Adam Super-Lanza who apparently never left his basement and never shot a gun in his life and looks like he coudn't even hold a gun up in front of him, and he probably passed away in 2009, went all the way up to CT to shoot up his mother's school where she worked as a teacher - woops, scratch that the story was changed, she didn't work there after all - and single handedly managed to shoot up the entire school with a virtually 100% kill ratio...but hey, it must all be true, it was on telavision, and President Barry and Joe Biden said it happened too.

Of course. I understand. You can't expect the FBI or CIA media dept. to do a nice photoshop job overnight. ww

Why overnight? I thought this was pre planned. There should be all kinds of photos and video created to make sure the govt conspiracy was accepted by all. What benefit is it to the govt to create rumors and conspiracy theroists when they can just make better presentations? I think it's odd that so many people can suspect the govt of huge wide ranging conspiracies and then point out so many simple details that anyone hatching such a scheme would have planned for ahead of time.

To address some of the many errors in your post: the assault weapon is the weapon he used (according to the coroner), Lanza often went shooting with his mother-anyway anyone can shoot a gun, it's not like you have to be "superman" to shoot little kids. The story of his mother being involved at the school is completely false and is all the fault of an early questioned witness that provided incorrect information that the media ran with. Not a govt or official source. He didn't "shoot up the whole school" just one room, why are you always stretching and exaggerating the story, you are as bad as you accuse the govt sources of being.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
I agree with Jaxvid that there is a perfectly logical explanation for not showing photographs of the corpses of dead children and staff (particularly at their funerals) from Sandy Hook. However, like Mohammed Atta and his cave-dwelling crew of “Muslim Hijackers†are never actually shown (in any of the instantly-destroyed airport surveillance videos) boarding the airplanes that razed the WTC buildings and the pentagon...what is the harm in showing surveillance stills of Adam Lanza stalking the entrance of Sandy Hook elementary? If nothing else, it would help the All-Kosher media to further instill the fact that this gay-looking little waif that hadn’t been seen by his neighbors, friends, or family (aside from his mother, whom he conveniently murdered that morning) since some three years prior, was every bit as sadistic as they foretold…

151690-004-36762ADA.jpg

CAPTION: Atta Boards a Plane in Maine, Not Boston

Unlike Atta, with Lanza, there isn’t even a lame, deceptive surveillance photo of him milling around the outside of the Sandy Hook building. What’s the harm in releasing a photo of the alleged “7’ long X 4’ wide spreadsheet chronicling past mass murders†that Lanza allegedly created on his computer? What’s the harm in showing us Lanza’s “video game dungeon†in which he played violent first-person shooter games 24-7? What’s the harm in showing the car he used parked in the parking lot that morning? What’s the harm in showing Lanza’s dead body, either at the scene of the crime or in the coroner’s office?

My thoughts on what really occurred at Sandy Hook are that the children and staff did actually die, but that this little wussy (third from the right in the top row) had nothing to do with it…

Adam-Lanza_2429494b.jpg

CAPTION: Lanza in his High School Audio-Visual Club

The question is, why would they choose to frame someone like Adam Lanza? Aside from a few former classmates calling him “nerdy†and “kinda weird,†he had no history of cruel or violent behavior or even a “political footprint†online. Is it because he lived near Sandy Hook? Because he was a socially-inept loser who never held a job, had no close friends, and was homeschooled by his gun-toting mother after middle school…and therefore knew the fewest amount of people who could establish his true character after the framing?

And if Lanza never really died, or died years prior, then what do we make of this story...



Nobody knows...and thanks to our technically-advanced media that prides itself on “reporting†every conceivable detail, at lightning speed…but goes deaf, dumb, and mute when details actually matter.

Is there supposed to be video of this? Does every elementary school have cameras? I'm pretty sure the one my children went to did not.

I don't see why it isn't possible that a withdrawn mentally troubled youth could not be capable of doing this? I don't think that type of thing is probable, but not impossible. You seem to think that it isn't possible. I don't know why? He had access to weapons. He was clearly a weirdo. Our society is sick. This happens extremely rarely amongst a population in the many millions. Doesn't seem impossible.

As far as the firing of the person that showed her husband the body of the shooter, isn't there some kind of rule of privacy that are taken very seriously in these matters. There may be legal issues at work. And it may just be an excuse to fire an under performing employee.

Also if the person had seen the body, as had the employee and there was some worry about them speaking out (if it wasn't Lanza) isn't it more likely that they would quietly "disappear" like youtube videoes, then have the incident make the newspapers? We are assuming that various branches of the govt have conspired to kill innocent little children and parade their grieving parents around for show, and they don't have the cajones to knock off a couple of people that step out of line? In fact wouldn't it be better to kill that couple and send a message that disobedience will not be tolerated? There must be thousands of people that know the "truth" about Sandy Hook. How can you keep them in line if getting fired is the only punishment they have to worry about? Showing off the "non-Lanza" shooters body seems like that would be a killing offense. (And why is there a body anyway if this was a govt set-up and Lanza didn't do it but some murky govt hit squad?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top