Reb:
I don't think Darwin even believed we came from apes, but theorized a common ancestor. But on this one I'd have to fact check.
In any case, I'd like you to explain exactly why apes have fingernails like humans (a small, but VERY important detail, since primates uniquely have them amongst mammals), and otherwise the same general morphology as humans. Speaking of which, why do humans have vestigial tail bones at the base of their spines? (Which ironically, is actually less developed and closer to being gone in apes.) Apes do use tools, CAN learn to use sign language and communicate coherently, and the most intelligent apes are smarter than the most retarded humans. If apes are not some sort of relative, if there is an iron wall between man and beast, then the Creator sure planted alot of false physiological clues in apes and men to throw us off. Kind of like all those dinosaur fossils he planted to to make us believe in a Mesazoic that never was.
You'd also have to explain to me our friends Australopithicus and Neanderthal and everyone in between, plainly human-like but clearly not human either. Hundreds of well-preserved Neanderthal skulls have been found, and no human ever had or could have that specific skull shape (Esp the brain that is constructed exactly backwards of ours, the flaring ribs and bell-shaped torso, and differntly shaped and proportioned limb bones that indicate muscles fit to make Strong Man competitors look like skinnny weaklings.)
Explain also the different gradients of modern human, like our beloved negros. It's obvious that we are very close to having three seperate species of human at least. Hell, no White man has ever produced a fertile offspring with a Khoisan bush-woman (Despite occasional attemps). It seems that evolution has produced at least two divergent populations of humans that are different species in the fullest sense of the word.Edited by: White_Savage