iSteve Blog Keeping the White Man Down at Running Back

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Steve Sailer is at it again, paying his dues for writing stuff about high white IQ's by running down white football players. The comments section illustrate why CF has languished over the years. White people refuse to defend their own.

Much talk about John Riggins and Jason Seahorn as some kind of once in a lifetime genetic freaks when in fact they were nothing more then guys who found some cracks in the system.

Oddly enough not one mention about Peyton Hillis who just a few years ago was the best RB in the game. Lots of dumping on Toby Gerhart for not immediately being OJ Simpson. How soon the white losers forget.

Some samples:
Football and especially the NFL has become a photonegative of 1960. White guys only allowed at certain white guy positions and only if he’s clearly superior to any of the Black guys.

Do you really believe this bilge? I figured after Matt Jones and Toby Gerhart even the caste footballers would have given up.


“John Riggins and Larry Czonka, two other white running backs from the 70′s and 80′s, who while not fleet of footâ€￾
----------------------------------------------

It would be nice if CFers signed in and spoke up but I realize the enthusiasm meter is down a bit around here.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,953
Steve Sailer is at it again, paying his dues for writing stuff about high white IQ's by running down white football players. The comments section illustrate why CF has languished over the years. White people refuse to defend their own.

Much talk about John Riggins and Jason Seahorn as some kind of once in a lifetime genetic freaks when in fact they were nothing more then guys who found some cracks in the system.

Oddly enough not one mention about Peyton Hillis who just a few years ago was the best RB in the game. Lots of dumping on Toby Gerhart for not immediately being OJ Simpson. How soon the white losers forget.

Some samples:
Football and especially the NFL has become a photonegative of 1960. White guys only allowed at certain white guy positions and only if he’s clearly superior to any of the Black guys.

Do you really believe this bilge? I figured after Matt Jones and Toby Gerhart even the caste footballers would have given up.


“John Riggins and Larry Czonka, two other white running backs from the 70′s and 80′s, who while not fleet of footâ€￾
----------------------------------------------

It would be nice if CFers signed in and spoke up but I realize the enthusiasm meter is down a bit around here.

A fellow named "Keypusher" zinged you for your comment on Peyton Hillis at Sailer's blog. Somebody zinged him back.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
A fellow named "Keypusher" zinged you for your comment on Peyton Hillis at Sailer's blog. Somebody zinged him back.

I didn't see anyone zing him back but I took a poke. His argument is weak. If Hillis, Riggins, and Seahorn were bums, why were they the only white bums that ever got a chance? He screwed his argument by running them down. If they were nothing special then the fact that NO other white players get a shot proves it's the system.

His only defense was to assert that Riggins, Hillis, and Seahorn were such rare once in a century white athletic freaks that they were able to compete with the black gods of 'merican football. He instinctively could not do that because he hates whites, so he had to disparage them, thereby proving my point. DWF's or maybe he is a DBF are such idiots.

http://www.unz.com/isteve/keeping-the-white-man-down-in-the-backfield/#comment-738691
 

Wes Woodhead

Mentor
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
1,104
I didn't see anyone zing him back but I took a poke. His argument is weak. If Hillis, Riggins, and Seahorn were bums, why were they the only white bums that ever got a chance? He screwed his argument by running them down. If they were nothing special then the fact that NO other white players get a shot proves it's the system.

His only defense was to assert that Riggins, Hillis, and Seahorn were such rare once in a century white athletic freaks that they were able to compete with the black gods of 'merican football. He instinctively could not do that because he hates whites, so he had to disparage them, thereby proving my point. DWF's or maybe he is a DBF are such idiots.

http://www.unz.com/isteve/keeping-the-white-man-down-in-the-backfield/#comment-738691

Jax Ive seen DWFs and blacks too that think the NFL is rigged on a level that would make bigunreal blush. They believe that any success of a white player is because of some inherent racism among owners, GMs, and coaches. In other words they think the exact opposite of what is actually going on.

Nothing really "special" about Big Riggins, or Csonka, or Hillis. They think that when a White man has good stats that its somehow been orchestrated, manipulated, or rigged. They think the NFL would be 100% black if the best players indeed played.

Its an upside down backwards world, and peoples minds are easily molded.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
1,016
His only defense was to assert that Riggins, Hillis, and Seahorn were such rare once in a century white athletic freaks that they were able to compete with the black gods of 'merican football.

The "freak" argument is becoming a popular one. It's the only way for them to deal with J.J. Watt. Problem is, there really aren't athletic freaks, not even Watt. A population of so many football players is going to mean that their abilities fall along a Bell Curve. That's why it's so odd that pretty much the only whites on defense are stars. Well, it's odd until you see the system for what it is, then it makes perfect sense. I don't mean to take anything away from these white stars, but they are not as athletically special from a racial perspective as it seems. In other words, no, Eric Weddle is not freakish in any way.

There is an anomaly, and the putative existence of the Caste System is an explanation for it. Until a better theory is offered, there it is, in all its glory. The "whites aren't good enough athletes" theory is severely hurt by the existence of Watt, Matthews, Weddle, Alonso, Smith, J. Smith, Kerrigan, Kuechly, Greenway, and so on.

The "whites aren't good enough at certain positions" theory is a more sophisticated version, but is also full of holes, and still doesn't explain the anomaly. Whites are good enough to be guards, but not the guys that guards block? Whites are good enough to be receivers, but not the guys who cover them? Okay, maybe so, but that requires some explanation; no, that requires a lot of explanation.

Unless a 3rd option can be offered, and I cannot imagine what it would look like, the choices are "whites aren't good enough athletes" and Caste System.
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
Riggins was special, and a bum, in the sense that the dude was an alcoholic, didnt train like he should have, and still schooled defenses on a regular basis. Now if he did take it a little more serious, hed have every record in th book imo. He split carries early on, with a few 1k seasons for the Jets, but didnt live up to his full potential. Showed more of it when with the Redskins. At times it looked like injuries slowed him down and he wasn't a speed demon, but then he broke that one long run in his first few years in Washington, granted he wasn't as fast on the famous superbowl run, still fast enough.

The fact that he wasn't always in top shape and still have a hall of fame career shows that Whites are more than able. Blacks like to think of themselves in that same scenario, the movie "the Great White Hype" they mock the idea of a White heavyweight contender. Damon Wayans eats junk and is out of shape and still destroys the White guy who got in great shape, although he wasn't a serious boxer when they found its still a ridiculous scenario because he started training again. However, Riggins did that same thing in real life, just in the football world.

Those black power people always have stupid arguments, nothing to really fall back on. When you argue with one they just resort to something stupid like "WELL WHITE PEOPLE CANT GO IN THE SUN WITHOUT SUNSCREEN OR THEYLL BURN UP" and im like yeah I go out in the sun all the time with none and im fine. "Oh yeah your gonna get terrible skin cancer later on then"
Stupid stuff like that.

the freak argument doesnt hold weight because okay, maybe they are freaks, lets say thats true for their argument, these Whites that are allowed to play caste positions are usually top at their position. Rarely do you see an average player that is White, if he is, he wont be there for long. Not even just above average in many cases. If they want job security they have to be elite. Tons of marginal black players at all positions, many that are below average. Even at qb, so the whole "yeah white dbs/wr get discriminated but so do black qbs" is not true anymore
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
7,003
Location
Suffolk County, NY
The "freak" argument is becoming a popular one. It's the only way for them to deal with J.J. Watt. Problem is, there really aren't athletic freaks, not even Watt. A population of so many football players is going to mean that their abilities fall along a Bell Curve. That's why it's so odd that pretty much the only whites on defense are stars. Well, it's odd until you see the system for what it is, then it makes perfect sense. I don't mean to take anything away from these white stars, but they are not as athletically special from a racial perspective as it seems. In other words, no, Eric Weddle is not freakish in any way.

There is an anomaly, and the putative existence of the Caste System is an explanation for it. Until a better theory is offered, there it is, in all its glory. The "whites aren't good enough athletes" theory is severely hurt by the existence of Watt, Matthews, Weddle, Alonso, Smith, J. Smith, Kerrigan, Kuechly, Greenway, and so on.

The "whites aren't good enough at certain positions" theory is a more sophisticated version, but is also full of holes, and still doesn't explain the anomaly. Whites are good enough to be guards, but not the guys that guards block? Whites are good enough to be receivers, but not the guys who cover them? Okay, maybe so, but that requires some explanation; no, that requires a lot of explanation.

Unless a 3rd option can be offered, and I cannot imagine what it would look like, the choices are "whites aren't good enough athletes" and Caste System.
Spot on post AA. I really enjoyed reading it.

You should post this on Steve Sailor's blog, which disappointingly has way more DWFs then I would have expected....
 
Top