A;s need to be diverse

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
In the Headlines section of this site, a writer is concernedover the lack of diversity on the Oakland A's baseball team. Apparently there are no blacks on the roster. Why is that a problem or bad thing? Our Olympic (losers) Basketball team was jet black, nowhite players were deemed worthy to play.Was the media concerned whenthatteam hadonly blacks ontheroster, without a single white? No one wasupset about alienating the white majority of this country.


Article Headline: A's not racist but need to be more diverse


Having several black players wouldn't by itself make them better, but having zero surely runs the risk of backlash. Because our world is diverse, the lack of it is bound to alienate some, especially here, where the 15-mile radius around McAfee Coliseum is as diverse as any area in the countryEdited by: Bart
 

White Shogun

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
6,285
I think there are writers out there who specifically look for situations just like this one so they can be the first to point out the need for "diversity." This will score big points in their little group of iconoclastic journalist friends. Their subjects will fawn over how right-on they are to point out this horrible vestige of racism in modern America. Their egos inflate further, if thats possible, amid all the politically-correct kudos and attaboys they will receive for merely noticing that, 'hey, they aren't any black men on that team.'
 

Bear-Arms

Mentor
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
United States
"Cough, then so do the Tigers"
 

Gary

Mentor
Joined
Dec 28, 2004
Messages
1,050
I don't follow baseball like I used to-but if the A's are mostly White I hope they win the World Series!!To bad they don't have Mark McGwire any more.
 

Bear-Arms

Mentor
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
United States
Gary said:
I don't follow baseball like I used to-but if the A's are mostly White I hope they win the World Series!!To bad they don't have Mark McGwire any more.

They are dead last in the Western Division.
 

Gary

Mentor
Joined
Dec 28, 2004
Messages
1,050
The S.F.Giants are dark and they are 28-37 and just as bad as the A's.I hope the White A's do better then the dark Giants.
 

Bear-Arms

Mentor
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
United States
Gary said:
The S.F.Giants are dark and they are 28-37 and just as bad as the A's.I hope the White A's do better then the dark Giants.

They got rid of Mulder & Hudson. Bobby Crosby has been hurt and Eric Chavez is having an off year. So, they are not without their problems. heh
 

Bear-Arms

Mentor
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
United States
hollywoodnorth said:
Bart is right. Our society is full of such double standards. In our 'modern/enlightened' society, it is absolutely imperative that everyone stop what they're doing and make sure the blacks/hispanics/jews/ muslims/indians/buddhists/homosexuals/transvestites/lesbians and anyone else who isn't 1)white and 2)male (prefferably christian heritage) are noticed, helped, funded and satisfied. However, no body must ever think twice (for that matter, even once is too much) about what the white men would like.

Democracy? Socrates would be rolling in his grave if he knew of the hypocrisy of American democracy.

You need to visit this website to understand the privileges you have for being white. www.whiteprivilege.com
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Hey great! When do I start getting all this stuff?

white privilege, a social relation
1. a. A right, advantage, or immunity granted to or enjoyed by white persons beyond the common advantage of all others; an exemption in many particular cases from certain burdens or liabilities.
b. A special advantage or benefit of white persons; with reference to divine dispensations, natural advantages, gifts of fortune, genetic endowments, social relations, etc.
2. A privileged position; the possession of an advantage white persons enjoy over non-white persons.
3. a. The special right or immunity attaching to white persons as a social relation; prerogative.
b. display of white privilege, a social expression of a white person or persons demanding to be treated as a member or members of the socially privileged class.
4. a. To invest white persons with a privilege or privileges; to grant to white persons a particular right or immunity; to benefit or favor specially white persons; to invest white persons with special honorable distinctions.
b. To avail oneself of a privilege owing to one as a white person.
5. To authorize or license of white person or persons what is forbidden or wrong for non-whites; to justify, excuse.
6. To give to white persons special freedom or immunity from some liability or burden to which non-white persons are subject; to exempt.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
I have just been enlighted as to my position in this country. Time for white entitlements!
smiley36.gif
 

Bear-Arms

Mentor
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
1,150
Location
United States
I laughed when you posted the definition.
smiley36.gif
 
Top