South Africa World Cup 2010

Borussia

Guru
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
231
Location
Florida
On this day, the better team won. And deserved to win. You can't win vs Spain if you don't have the ball. Germany really just had 2 or 3 decent chances. Ozil could have been more aggressive on one chance and Kroos did hit the target, but that was really the best chance for Germany. Hey, Iker Cassiles is no sluch keeper either. Podolski's chance was okay, the defender was on him like white on rice.

Spain clearly had more chances to score and deserved to win. 100% White Spanish team in the final. No trash talkers, no prima donna attitude either.
An all around excellent team.

Germany will be back and the nucleus is still young. Goalie Neuer will be GK for at least a decade.
They did fantastic in this WC, better then I honestly expected. With the exception of Boateng, nothing that inherently unfair regarding the lineup from a Caste perspective.
I do not foresee Germany becoming like black worshiping England anytime soon.

Spain will wait, be strategic and slowly break you down. They played with more confidence then Germany today. They seemed to know that they would eventually score some how, some way. Germany seemed to realize this as well.
I think Germany could have been more aggressive today. Spain dictated play the whole game. Spain is more technical and skilled and can pass better.Knowing this going in, perhaps Germany could have used their size to throw off timing and such.

Spain would make a great WC champion though. Hmm, no affletes on the squad. How can this be when blacks are the world's best athletes??

The TV and papers have told me so for years...
 

white lightning

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
20,689
I think the stategy of Germany was poor. They were to patient waiting to counter attack the whole game. By halftime they should have realised that they need to change their game plan. They rarely got shots on goal like you said. They needed to be aggresive for the whole game to put the pressure on Spain. Germany didn't become the only team to score 4 goals in three games in any World Cup by accident. Poor game plan.

The only thing I don't like about Spain is that so many dumb americans consider them to be hispanic. They are obviously white but in the US they look at things backwards.

I like both teams but I'm rooting for Holland.
 

Kaptain

Master
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
3,346
Location
Minnesota
I was pulling for Germany because of all the blond-haired blue-eyed devils on the team. Certainly not too disappointed with Spain winning though. It would have been nice for Germany to have Muller for this game. What a bogus yellow card.

Boeteng certainly seemed like a weak link to me. He gave up a corner he shouldn't have, nearly gave up a free kick - the ref. bailing him out, and turned the ball over on poor passes a couple of times. He also looks slow-footed.
 

alln2

Guru
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
242
Muller's absence was felt very heavily in the German attack. Trochowski was far away from being an adequate replacement, he contributted very little to the offensive game of the germans. Kroos should have played from the start. Janssen likewise. Then Germany would surely have had more shots on goal and more chances in the first half.

There was a german counter around 40 min exactly like the counter for the third goal against England, Klose had the ball on the spanish 16m, the whole left flank of spanish defence was open, only there was no Muller to take advantage of the situation, Trochowski arrived too late.
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
GiovaniMarcon said:
Have the straw-graspers in the media began calling Spain "the descendants of Moors" yet?

Desperation is funny. And desperate.

Probably MOST Spaniards just by probability of all the marriages and mixing and mingling that has gone on since the Moors were thrown out of Spain in the (early 1400s?) I believe have a small amount of Moorish blood. However, as far as what I've read, the Moors were not entirely black, but were often admixtures of Berber, Arab and black from all the mixing and mingling that went on with the Muslim (Moorish) conquests in North Africa in the late 600s and entire 700s. I believe the battle that pushed the Moors out of France after they started their conquests into Europe (and pushed them back into the Iberian Peninsula) didn't happen until Charlemagne's reign in the 800s. I'm not great at remembering exact dates and am a slow reader and not a history major, so correct me if I'm wrong guys. Still, I was actually thinking along very similar lines to the post you made Giovanni. BSPN will do anything to keep their black supremacy house of cards from even being shaken a little. Someday us big "bad" white wolves are going to blow this pathological house of cards down though!
smiley32.gif
 

GeneralLee

Newbie
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
36
Location
Illinois
I hope Holland wins!!!

Should Germany fire it's coach and hire Klinsmann to coach the team in both 2012 Euro Champoinships and the 2014 World cup. A change in coaches will be needed I don't think they were prepared enough.
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
I think I'm hoping for Holland as well. It would be nice to see them get rewarded for fielding more legit Dutchman then their last World Cup team! Maybe it will open some eyes to how things ought to be done.
 

Guest

Newbie
Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
82
ToughJ.Riggins said:
GiovaniMarcon said:
Have the straw-graspers in the media began calling Spain "the descendants of Moors" yet?

Desperation is funny. And desperate.

Probably MOST Spaniards just by probability of all the marriages and mixing and mingling that has gone on since the Moors were thrown out of Spain in the (early 1400s?) I believe have a small amount of Moorish blood. However, as far as what I've read, the Moors were not entirely black, but were often admixtures of Berber, Arab and black from all the mixing and mingling that went on with the Muslim (Moorish) conquests in North Africa in the late 600s and entire 700s. I believe the battle that pushed the Moors out of France after they started their conquests into Europe (and pushed them back into the Iberian Peninsula) didn't happen until Charlemagne's reign in the 800s. I'm not great at remembering exact dates and am a slow reader and not a history major, so correct me if I'm wrong guys. Still, I was actually thinking along very similar lines to the post you made Giovanni. BSPN will do anything to keep their black supremacy house of cards from even being shaken a little. Someday us big "bad" white wolves are going to blow this pathological house of cards down though!
smiley32.gif

The Moors were not "entirely black", more like barely black at all. The Berbers from North Africa are descendents of Carthagians who were pretty much tanned Caucasians. The Arabs they intermingled with may have had slight african ancestry, but were also predominantly white or brown.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8r9n7_oy2c&feature=related
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
I remember a H.S teacher I had saying that the Moors were Berber, black African and Arab admixture somewhere in that order. I also thought I read somewhere that Berbers migrated from the Iberian peninsula back to north Africa thousands of years ago, so they are really similar ethnically to the Spanish anyway.

Good to know that the Moors were barely black at all, b/c I don't believe race mixing between blacks and whites brings a good result culturally or genetically. I'd have to guess though, that I'm sure there were some Moors who were darker due to having a small black admixture from race mixing during the conquests. However, it's good to know that MOST black/white race mixing in Europe has only been recent- and therefore you can usually tell if the person is black, white or a mix. Hopefully black/white dating will start to dwindle. I can't tell two people who truly think they're in love what to do, but personally I have never been interested in dating black girls and don't understand white men who prefer black girls to white, Amero-Indian, Middle Eastern or south or east Asian girls, but that's just my take.Edited by: ToughJ.Riggins
 

Charlie

Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
354
Steve Sailer incorrectly thinks, "...Spain, a team that looks at least as white as the Washington Senators of the late 1930s, who used to sneak, pre-Jackie Robinson, a couple of part-black Cuban players onto the squad on the grounds that they were Latin so the color line didn't count...".

All Moors (and Jews) were 'politely and gently' escorted out of Spain in 1492. Any products of race-mixing left with them. A child with only one parent who is Muslim is still Muslim. A child born in a harem was Muslim. The product of a Muslim rape was Muslim.

The Iberians kept close watch on who was and who wasn't Muslim (and Jewish). Fighting a continual war for over 700 years doesn't promote tolerance. Lists were made. The Muslims did not convert to Christianity.

America has never expelled its slaves, Indians or their descendants. So they are still here, in all sorts of permutations. Spain, in contrast, is pure. No admixture for over 500 years. No one in Spain says, 'I'm part Moor you know. Helps to explain why I'm such a good thief and have such full lips.'

Perhaps even more than Basque terrorism the most irritating thing about Basques to many Spaniards is the Basque insistence they are pure blooded (along with Galicians) while the Spanish have been polluted. It's insulting because it's wrong.

Who on the Spanish team does Sailer think is part-black? He's a good writer but he can bring forth some odd ideas. Does he think Spain's current success is due to hidden black genetics?
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
I have gone on record admitting that I wanted to see Germany win the World Cup, so on that note, I'm disappointed with today's result. However, Germany played a terrible game, unlike anything we'd seen up to this point. Spain must get some of the credit for that, neutralizing some of the German strengths (mid-field play, counter-attacks), while patiently playing their own game with superb defense and ball control, and finally getting the goal they needed to win.

Schweinstieger, Ozil, and Podolski were a shadow of their prior performances, Mueller was missed, and Boateng was clearly a weak link. Coach Loew realized his mistake right away and subbed him early in the 2nd half. Why not sub him at half time, and he'd still have 2 more subs if needed? Loew must also get some of the blame for not properly adjusting in the 2nd half once he realized things weren't working.

Spain is a very good team, and they appear to have the Germans' number right now. What an incredible final we're going to have, with 11 white Spaniards (no mixing, no multi-cultural garbage) going up against a Dutch team with 9 whites. This is a tough call for me, but I'm going to go with Spain on this one.

As someone noted earlier, how nice it will be that for the 2nd time in a row, a 100% native European team can win the World Cup, after Italy in 2006.
smiley32.gif
 

dan1983

Newbie
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
4
Location
The Andes Mount
Charlie said:
Steve Sailer incorrectly thinks, "...Spain, a team that looks at least as white as the Washington Senators of the late 1930s, who used to sneak, pre-Jackie Robinson, a couple of part-black Cuban players onto the squad on the grounds that they were Latin so the color line didn't count...".



Who on the Spanish team does Sailer think is part-black? He's a good writer but he can bring forth some odd ideas. Does he think Spain's current success is due to hidden black genetics?
This is the post to which Charlie was referring to:
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/07/world-cup-final-spain-v-netherlands.html

Sailer writes horrible garbage often, especially on athletics, he is always writing about how blacks are the most amazing athletes in the world, that east asians are athletically inferior due to lower testosterone levels,etc... the typical espn-analysis, the guy could easily switch places with Alexis Lalas and we wouldn't note much of a difference.
Now in a bizarre paragraph, he writes that the spanish football team (which doesn't have a single starting player of black origin) is somehow similar to a baseball team from the 1930's that fielded several mulatos.
smiley7.gif


For example, Here's more annoying gibberish Sailer wrote a few years ago:
"While soccer remains hamstrung by the need to keep
the game affordable in the Third World, Americans could adopt costly
innovations
such as separate offensive and defensive units that make the
football far more exciting than soccer"</span>
smiley36.gif

http://www.amconmag.com/article/2006/jul/17/00018/







Besides , his blog's comments are heavily censored.
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
Germany certainly could have benefited from a few more calls in the box, which would have resulted in possible penalty kick goals"¦but they played poorly for the majority of the contest. Spain was undoubtedly the better team yesterday. They dominated ball possession, they had much better passing, and they produced more creative scoring opportunities. Germany should consider itself quite lucky to have only lost by a single goal.

Perhaps the 2014 World Cup will feature a more white-friendly German roster. Ozil has earned his position, but Khedira and Boateng could easily be replaced with a European white player, as both players are undeniably average. Cacau is almost 30, and despite scoring an easy, uncontested goal versus Australia, was injured for most of the tournament and produced nothing in his lone start (for a red-carded Klose) against Ghana.

Hopefully old stalwarts such as Klose (32) and Ballack (33) will return in 2014, but that will be determined by the quality of their club play in the coming years. Uruguay vs. Germany in the 3rd place game should be interesting.

The thread for this amazing World Cup tournament has been great. Many thanks to all contributors"¦and to think, we lowly, know-nothing serfs didn't even need the aid of the self-proclaimed "savior of the soccer thread," haha.Edited by: Thrashen
 

speedster

Mentor
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Messages
704
In the Toronto paper the Globe and Mail two days ago there were a couple of stories on the German team accompanyed with a photo.In this photo there were three German players warming up and two of them were Boateng and Aogo.Yesterday on the front page they had a photo of two Dutch players celebrating their win with the crowd.The players were Robben and the black guy who came into the game as a sub with two minutes left.It's everywhere folks.Speaking of Boateng I was paying attention to him yesterday.The man is imobile and runs like he has stilts for legs.Mr.Stiltlegs.
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,973
Location
Arkansas
there are some really perceptive posts in this thread. i am very happy that my fellow American CFers have taken such an interest in the beautiful game. i'm just sad that i've been away from the internet, and i couldn't contribute in a more timely manner.

it's interesting that of the 4 final teams, i've a connection with 3 of them. when i first began to be interested in soccer, my first favorite player was Dennis Bergkamp, of the Netherlands. he was incredible. soon thereafter in support of my appreciation of the sport (and to try to get me to be a fan of his favorite team), a friend of mine who was attending school in Spain sent me a Spanish National Team jersey. i still have it (and i picked Spain to win the whole thing before the 2010 Tourney started). when i finally felt informed enough about which teams played which styles and so forth to make an educated decision on "my" team, i chose Germany as my favorite national side. i was just amazed about how efficient, skilled, and unselfish they played. it was like that incredible German engineering even affected their football. i'm sad they were knocked out, but Spain is a most worthy team.

Germany were really hurt by not having Mueller on the field against theterrific speedand skillful passing of Spain, i think.

it has been an incredible World Cup. and it's still not quite over!Edited by: Jimmy Chitwood
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,973
Location
Arkansas
Thrashen posted briefly about this earlier in the thread, but i wanted to provide an update now that the Championship weekend is coming up. the Top 8 Goal Scorers in the 2010 World Cup are White athletes.

(for players with the same number of goals, the fewest minutes played determines the higher ranking)

5435d7958ffb3a43d134ae5c6196d3fe_david_villa-6658.jpg

#1 David Villa (Spain) 5 goals

Wesley_Sneijder_516419a.jpg

#2 Wesley Sneijder (Netherlands) 5 goals

58065_news.jpg

#3 Gonzalo Higuain (Argentina) 4 goals

33164.jpg

#4 Robert Vittek (Slovakia) 4 goals

Miroslav_Klose_Germany_2006_765666.jpg

#5 Miroslav Klose (Germany) 4 goals

thomas-mueller.jpg

#6 Thomas Mueller (Germany) 4 goals

diego-forlan.jpg

#7 Diego Forlan (Uruguay) 4 goals

landon-donovan-asd654ddgdg.jpg

#8 Landon Donovan (USA)3 goals

Spanish, Dutch, German, and Uruguayan players still have a chance to move up the list as their teams still have one more contest to play.

on a related note, only 12 players in World Cup history have totalled double-digit goals scored. only one of those (Miroslav Klose with 14) is playing in this World Cup. the most likely player to next make the list is Spain's David Villa (8 career World Cup goals). of the 12 Top Goal Scorers in World Cup history, 9 are White men. the top scorer is Brazilian mulatto Ronaldo, with 15 goals.

article-1190356-052F451E000005DC-848_224x399.jpg

Gerd Muller (Germany) 14 goals

Foto-de-Miroslav-Klose.jpg

Miroslav Klose (Germany) 14 goals

55.jpg

Just Fontaine (France) 13 goals

jurgen_klinsmann_69629s.jpg

Jurgen Klinsmann (Germany) 11 goals

36988.gif

Sandor Kocsis (Hungary) 11 goals

wbSOCCERbatistuta_wideweb__430x277.jpg

Gabriel Batistuta (Argentina) 10 goals

lineker2.jpg

Gary Lineker (England) 10 goals

helmut-rahn-091.jpg

Helmut Rahn (Germany) 10 goals

grzegorz_lato_poland.jpg

Grzegorz Lato (Poland) 10 goals
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,973
Location
Arkansas
according to BBC columnist, and former Liverpool defender, Alan Hansen the 2010 World Cup is "one of the best ever." can you imagine why?
smiley2.gif


if you thought it might be because of the talent and skill of the players and highly entertaining and hotly contested matches ... well, you'd be dead wrong.

the REAL reason, of course, is'cause the african'ts have provided such a great placeto holdthe tournament.
smiley8.gif


A top BBC football analyst and former Liverpool great says the other major soccer tournaments he has attended "pale into insignificance" when compared with the South African World Cup.

In a column for the BBC, Alan Hansen said that although the on-field action had been "slightly disappointing" the best thing about the World Cup so far had been "the atmosphere in South Africa".

He said the tournament had been "organised magnificently" and local fans had "continued to be fantastic even after South Africa went out".

"The South African public have not just embraced this World Cup, they have enhanced it and, for that reason, it should go down in history as one of the best ever. People really seem to have been enjoying themselves. It has been a terrific tournament," he said.

Hansen is apparently Scotland's equivalent to America's Alexi Lalas: both are White, formerly great defenders who have sold their soul to embrace the multi-cult.
smiley11.gif
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,973
Location
Arkansas
one last note on the World Cup for the time being ...

i'm not sold on the whole Castrol Index analysis, but for those who might be interested in its assessment the current Top 11 has an interesting lineup. only one of the Top 11 has any african't ancestry (Brazil's caramel-colored midfielder, Gilberto Silva). Argentine forward Luis Suarez (mestizo?) is the only other player who could be considered non-White. the top-rated overall player is Spanish defender Sergio Ramos.

the Castrol Index willalter following the 2 matches this weekend (it changes after each game).

but, according to the media "experts" black people have so much more affleticism and game-breaking ability, and so forth. according to them, it shouldn't be possible for the top performers (by any measuring standard one might utilize) of a world athletic competition to be dominated by White athletes ... at least that's what i'm told every day by ESPN. so how can this be?!?!?
smiley2.gif


also, i will be putting together my all-World Cup team sometime after the championship game on Sunday. i'd be interested to see the lineups some of you other guys come up with, as well. so be considering your rosters, gentlemen.
smiley43.gif
 

Highlander

Mentor
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
1,778
Difficult pick for the Championship game. The good thing is it's a "win win" either way. I liked the starting lineup of the Netherlands on their last match against Uruguay. De Jong didn't play and I believe they started 10 or 11 Whites.

The pros from a Caste perspective if the Netherlands wins is that they can do so without the multi-culti and North Ghana clubs they used to field in the 90's and early 00's. In fact, they've already proven they can go further in the tournament without them.

The pros from a Caste perspective if Spain wins are obvious. They can do it not only with 100% Whites, but Whites of their own nationality. As pure of a win as can be.

Another consideration if Spain wins is that the Netherlands knows they got beat by a 100% White team, providing further proof that having non-Whites on your team is not a prerequisite to win the World Cup, or to even qualify for it in the first place. The fate of the African't teams (including Senegal North (aka France)), and even England, in this tournament, further cement this notion.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Jimmy Chitwood said:
according to BBC columnist, and former Liverpool defender, Alan Hansen the 2010 World Cup is "one of the best ever." can you imagine why?
smiley2.gif

<div> </div>
<div>if you thought it might be because of the talent and skill of the players and highly entertaining and hotly contested matches ... well, you'd be dead wrong. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>the REAL reason, of course, is 'cause the african'ts have provided such a great place to hold the tournament.
smiley8.gif
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
A top BBC football analyst and former Liverpool great says the other major soccer tournaments he has attended "pale into insignificance" when compared with the South African World Cup.In a column for the BBC, Alan Hansen said that although the on-field action had been "slightly disappointing" the best thing about the World Cup so far had been "the atmosphere in South Africa".He said the tournament had been "organised magnificently" and local fans had "continued to be fantastic even after South Africa went out"."The South African public have not just embraced this World Cup, they have enhanced it and, for that reason, it should go down in history as one of the best ever. People really seem to have been enjoying themselves. It has been a terrific tournament," he said.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Hansen is apparently Scotland's equivalent to America's Alexi Lalas: both are White, formerly great defenders who have sold their soul to embrace the multi-cult.
smiley11.gif
</div>

I am sure Hansen will want to move down there.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
"Speaking of Boateng I was paying attention to him yesterday.The man is imobile and runs like he has stilts for legs.Mr.Stiltlegs. "

I also noted that. He runs like one leg is much longer than the other.It's very weird.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
dan1983 said:
Charlie said:
Steve Sailer incorrectly thinks, "...Spain, a team that looks at least as white as the Washington Senators of the late 1930s, who used to sneak, pre-Jackie Robinson, a couple of part-black Cuban players onto the squad on the grounds that they were Latin so the color line didn't count...".

Who on the Spanish team does Sailer think is part-black? He's a good writer but he can bring forth some odd ideas. Does he think Spain's current success is due to hidden black genetics?
This is the post to which Charlie was referring to:http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/07/world-cup-final-spain-v-netherlands.htmlSailer writes horrible garbage  often, especially on athletics, he is always writing about how blacks are the most amazing athletes in the world, that east asians are athletically inferior due to lower testosterone levels,etc... the typical espn-analysis, the guy could easily switch places with Alexis Lalas and we wouldn't note much of a difference. Now in a bizarre paragraph, he writes that the spanish football team (which doesn't have a single starting player of black origin) is somehow similar to a baseball team from the 1930's that fielded several mulatos.
smiley7.gif
For example, Here's more annoying gibberish  Sailer wrote a few years ago:&lt;span ="webtext"&gt;"While soccer remains hamstrung by the need to keep
the game affordable in the Third World, Americans could adopt costly
innovations
such as separate offensive and defensive units that make the
football far more exciting than soccer"&lt;/span&gt;
smiley36.gif
http://www.amconmag.com/article/2006/jul/17/00018/Besides , his blog's comments are heavily censored. 

I like Sailer in general,but he thinks just because a guy is faster he is a better soccer player. He would pick SWP,Walcott or Aaron Lennon over Beckham because they are faster,even though Beckham is a much better soccer player than they are. I remember last WC when every announcer had to state that Beckham isn't the best soccer player even though he is the most famous and they kept saying that England should put in Lennon over him. Sailer would probalby have sprint races to see who to put in midfield and when a black guy beat Xavi or Iniesta he would pick the black guy.
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
Speaking of Alexi Lalas-Vuvuzela, I have noticed that he's more subdued lately. I've also seen him act a bit cold and even hostile towards his co-analyts.

I like the other analysts. Martinez, McNamanan (sp?), and Gullit appear to be fair and informed in their analysis, without any hint of caste-speak. Lalas-Vuvuzela on the other hand, has been thoroughly indoctrinated under the ESPN black supremacy agenda.

So, come on L-V, we know there are no Africans left for you to worship, and you must be getting tired of talking about the Sneijders, Villas, Kloses, and Forlans of the world, but keep your professionalism intact for a few more days.
smiley17.gif
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Ok gents, me being a moderate to hard CFer, I want Spain to crush Germany by a score of 4 to 1. I am part German and Spainard, but from a Caste perspective, Spain being all European (white) has to smash Germany for their "multi culti" exiperment.

Viva Spain and rub that prick Lalas Vavazela face in it and then take that horn and sodamize his mouth with it!!!
 
Top