College Football

White Starters in Major College Football in 2009
by Col. Reb

(9/26/09) This picture illustrates the plight of the white college football player in 2009. Marginalized years ago, by white coaches who embraced black players for their supposed athletic superiority, whites have been forced to the back of the bus at many positions.

Using even the most conservative estimate, whites make up over two-thirds of the U.S. population in 2009. It seems highly unlikely that a game that whites have enjoyed and excelled at for so many years could be so dominated by non-whites simply by chance, especially when you consider that the vast majority of U.S. high school football players are white.

Even with many half white rosters in FBS football in 2009, the number of white starters is much lower, partly due to the influence of pro-Caste college football recruiting services that consistently rank non-white players higher than white players with equal or better skills and/or stats. When whites are recruited at positions like cornerback, tailback, or wide receiver, they are often buried on the depth chart by coaches who could care less about their talents, or they are told to switch to a more racially correct (but often unnatural) position like safety, linebacker, tight end, or fullback.

Many times, superior white players will sit the bench in favor of inferior black athletes who start even after performing badly for several games. Such discrimination goes un-reported by mainstream sports journalists; however, we at Caste Football are here to report all the facts so white football recruits can choose teams that are more likely to give them a fair chance to play their natural position, whatever it may be. Most of the blame for such widespread anti-white discrimination should rightly be placed on the university athletic administrators and coaches of the FBS, who buy into the Caste hype and recruit nearly all-black classes each year, while telling the record breaking white stars to walk on or go to a smaller school.

Here are the breakdowns of white starters by team and conference, using the 22 full-time offensive and defensive positions as a baseline for comparisons. As you scroll down, you will notice some interesting geographical factors to these numbers.

Southeastern Conference
Vanderbilt-11/22
Alabama-8/22
Arkansas-7/22
Tennessee-6/22
Georgia-5/22
LSU-5/22
Mississippi State-5/22
Ole Miss-5/22
South Carolina-5/22
Auburn-3/22
Florida-3/22
Kentucky-3/22

Total of 66/264 (25%) in the SEC

Mountain West Conference
BYU-16/22
Colorado State-16/22
Air Force-15/22
Wyoming-15/22
Texas Christian-10/22
New Mexico-8/22
San Diego State-8/22
UNLV-8/22
Utah-8/22

Total of 104/198 (52.52%) in the MWC

Big 12
Nebraska-13/22
Colorado-12/22
Kansas State-12/22
Kansas-11/22
Texas A&M-10/22
Baylor-9/22
Missouri-9/22
Texas-9/22
Texas Tech-8/22
Iowa State-7/22
Oklahoma-7/22
Oklahoma State-5/22

Total of 112/264 (42.4%) in the Big 12

Big 10
Northwestern-15/22
Iowa-13/22
Wisconsin-13/22
Penn State-12/22
Michigan State-11/22
Minnesota-11/22
Ohio State-11/22
Purdue-11/22
Indiana-9/22
Michigan-8/22
Illinois-4/22

Total of 118/242 (48.76%) in the Big 10

FBS Independents
Army-13/22
Navy-13/22
Notre Dame-10/22

Total of 36/66 (54.5%) for the Independents

Atlantic Coast Conference
Wake Forest-11/22
Boston College-10/22
North Carolina-9/22
Virginia-9/22
Duke-7/22
Georgia Tech-7/22
North Carolina State-7/22
Florida State-6/22
Virginia Tech-6/22
Clemson-5/22
Maryland-4/22
Miami-4/22

Total of 85/264 (32.2%) in the ACC

Sun Belt Conference
Western Kentucky-13/22
Troy-10/22
Florida International-9/22
Louisiana Monroe-8/22
Florida Atlantic-7/22
Arkansas State-6/22
Louisiana Lafayette-6/22
North Texas-5/22
Middle Tennessee State-4/22

Total of 68/198 (34.3%) in the Sun Belt

Conference-USA
Central Florida-12/22
Southern Methodist-11/22
Rice-10/22
Tulsa-10/22
Tulane-8/22
Southern Miss-6/22
UAB-6/22
Houston-5/22
Marshall-5/22
UTEP-5/22
Memphis-4/22
East Carolina-3/22

Total of 85/264 (32.2%) in C-USA

Mid-America Conference
Central Michigan-13/22
Eastern Michigan-12/22
Northern Illinois-12/22
Western Michigan-12/22
Ball State-11/22
Bowling Green-11/22
Buffalo-10/22
Kent State-10/22
Ohio-10/22
Miami-9/22
Toledo-8/22
Akron-7/22
Temple-6/22

Total of 131/286 (45.8%) in the MAC

Big East
Cincinnati-12/22
Rutgers-10/22
Connecticut-9/22
Pittsburgh-9/22
Syracuse-9/22
West Virginia-9/22
Louisville-6/22
South Florida-5/22

Total of 69/176 (39.2%) in the Big East

Western Athletic Conference
Boise State-10/22
Fresno State-10/22
Idaho-9/22
Louisiana Tech-8/22
New Mexico State-7/22
Hawaii-5/22
San Jose State-5/22
Utah State-5/22
Nevada-4/22

Total of 63/198 (31.82%) in the WAC

Pac-10
Stanford-15/22
Oregon State-12/22
Washington State-11/22
Oregon-10/22
California-8/22
UCLA-8/22
Washington-8/22
Arizona-7/22
Arizona State-7/22
USC-5/22

Total of 91/220 (41.36%) in the Pac-10

Total number of white starters in the FBS in 2009=1,028/2,640 = 38.94%

We can compare the number of white starters by conference as either members or non-members of the Bowl Championship System. There is a slight difference between these two groups, with BCS member conferences starting over 2% fewer whites than non-BCS member conferences.

Overall, the whitest conference is the Mountain West, with over 52% white starters. This is not a surprise, since many MWC teams are in areas with almost entirely white populations, and they tend to have coaches who are willing to give whites a fair chance for playing time at the Caste positions of CB, RB, and WR.

The blackest conference is no surprise either, that being the Southeastern Conference. The Caste System has a strong hold on coaches in the Southeast, and they usually aren’t interested in fairness enough to consider recruiting a white player for one of the ultra-Caste positions, let alone playing him.

BCS Members
Big 10-118/242 (48.76%)
Big 12-112/264 (42.4%)
Pac 10-91/220 (41.36%)
Big East-69/176 (39.2%)
ACC-85/264 (32.2%)
SEC-66/264 (25%)

Total of 541/1,430 (37.83%)

Non-BCS Members
Independents-36/66 (54.5%)
MWC-104/198 (52.52%)
MAC-131/286 (45.8%)
Sun Belt-68/198 (34.3%)
C-USA-85/264 (32.2%)
WAC-63/198 (31.82%)

Total of 487/1,210 (40.25%)

You might be asking yourself where the good news is in all of this. The good news is that since 2005, the number of half white or better FBS teams has increased, which means that the situation can be improved by using knowledge of anti-white discrimination to work in our favor.

The best thing you can do with this article is to email it or print it off and show it to your friends, relatives, and any white high school players you know, so they can make wise decisions when it comes time for them to choose a place to play one of the many sports that whites have always excelled at, college football.