Why shouldn’t every other race

G

Guest

Guest
be consideredwhen the playing of football at the college or pro level is involved. What i mean is if a player is from Tonga and dark but is not black meaning African American thenI consider him worthy of being a player thatI hope excels. To me it is blacks in one category and everyone else in the other whites ,hispanics pacific islanders, Hawians,Asians, Indians native or other wise all at one time or the other has been told that he is not as good as his black counterpart. So I will root


for all of the running backs on BYU,and Utah and not even think twice because beleive me they might face more racism than the white players. So can we supports players of all races just so long as they're not black gansta thugs who been pampered at a young age because some idiot truly beleives they are the best athletes even when it has been proven they are not.I would like your comments please their are two categories the brothas and everyone else.
 

whiteCB

Master
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
2,282
Yeah I agree with that except for that even if you are half black the NFL and big time college teams will consider you black. Just look at Robert Smith he wasn't fully black but was allowed to run the ball in the NFL and there are other examples as well.
 

KG2422

Mentor
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
986
Location
Texas
Success by other groups would probably just move us further down the totem pole of athleticism in the minds of the lemmings. I'm mainly concerned with the success of our people. These "others" are just as tribalistic in their loyalties to their own people as blacks are.Edited by: KG2422
 

Deus Vult

Mentor
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
648
Location
Louisiana
Don't blame blacks for simply being who they are. They are not the hypocrites; they are not the deracinated sellouts. Whatever success a black man earns, he deserves.

I am thoroughly pro-white. My contempt -- dare I say hate -- is reserved for white liberals who tear down white people in favor of others.

I don't like the overt black style because I don't relate to it. We are not made, however, to relate to one another, at least not without one of us losing his soul. White men relate more to good sportsmanship and, as the saying goes, "acting like you've been there..."

The other races -- Asians, Pacific Islanders, mestizos, etc -- are not my folk. Blacks' relative dysfunction does not equate to whites having kinship with the others. I don't begrudge whatever they earn, and wish them well in life. But they don't belong here (North America). They all come to enjoy what whites built. Blacks didn't get a choice. Rich white men used them then dumped them on the rest of us -- kinda like they're doing with mestizos these days. Blacks will have to remain until we can figure out how to achieve a mutually beneficial arrangement.
 

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
Deus Vult said:
Whatever success a black man earns, he
deserves.

Have you ever heard of the term Affirmative Action? Racial Quotas?
Promoting diversity? Blacks are the last group that should gain merit
for their actions due to the many social and professional
entitlements provided to them by Uncle Sam. I don't think you give
enough credit to the politics of blacks and the democratic process.
Those sell-out white liberals are not in control. In order to
"represent their district" they actually have to represent the feelings
and values of their district. Blacks are smart enough to know that a
black agenda pushed by a white face will move farther. The last
thing that I am going to do is underestimate my adversary.

When natural selection is the policy for employment, college
admissions, government grants, and financial aid, then and only
then will blacks actually deserve anything they get.

Vote YES for Proposal 2.Edited by: C Darwin
 

JD074

Master
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,301
Location
Kentucky
dolphin Jimmy said:
To me it is blacks in one category and everyone else in the other whites ,hispanics pacific islanders, Hawians, Asians, Indians native or other wise all  at one time or the other has been told that he is not as good as his black counterpart. 

We are emphatically not in the same boat as all non-blacks. We are the ones who have been singled out for oppression and subjugation. We're all alone. Besides, those "Pacific islanders" that you mentioned seem to be doing pretty well....

So I will root for all of the running backs on BYU,and Utah and not even think twice because beleive me they might face more racism than the white players.

No group in America is discriminated against more than whites. Besides, why root for a non-white running back when there are so many talented white men who could fill that position, but aren't allowed to because of their skin color?

So can we supports players of all races just so long as they're not black gansta thugs who been pampered at a young age because some idiot truly beleives they are the best athletes even when it has been proven they are not.

So you're saying that we should root for white athletes, non-black athletes, and even black athletes so long as they're not "gangsta thugs?" Wow, that's a huge tent you've got there! Thanks, but no thanks. You can support all players of all races, but I won't. Never. I couldn't care less about them. I only care about my own folk.

It seems to me that you're suffering from a guilty conscience over the premise of this site, and your participation here, and you're trying to alleviate it. This site is about celebrating white athletes. I hope you can stick around, but you'll have to accept that.

I would like your comments please their are two categories the brothas and everyone else.

I will never put myself in the same category as all other non-blacks. My race actually means something to me.
 

Thunder

Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
14
Dolphin Jimmy, keep reading the posts and the articles on this site and then you'll understand what it's about. I've read lots and lots of articles and have many more still to go!
 
Top