New Year’s Disgrace

Discussion in 'Happy Hour' started by DixieDestroyer, Jan 1, 2018.

  1. DixieDestroyer

    DixieDestroyer Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    9,196
    Location:
    Dixieland
  2. Leonardfan

    Leonardfan Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,132
    This is pretty much every New Year's in Britain.
     
  3. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    22,138
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I don't know what's happened to White women physically. So many now have manly jaws and unfeminine faces in general. A few of them in the pics above can pass as lady boys. The sweet-faced White girl is Nature's greatest creation, but is becoming harder to find.
     
  4. Riggins44

    Riggins44 Master

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,229
    Location:
    Virginia
    I attribute most of this to these young Britons being intentionally brainwashed by the (((string pullers))) of the "popular culture", which endlessly puts out the image and idea that its cool for white men to act like idiots and white women to act like sluts. Because of the internet many of these young people will eventually be red-pilled and will wake up from their slumber.
     
  5. booth

    booth Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2015
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    n.c.
    Is it just me or does all British women look like Boy George ?
     
  6. DixieDestroyer

    DixieDestroyer Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    9,196
    Location:
    Dixieland
    :lol: ROTFLOL!
     
  7. Heretic

    Heretic Master

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,781
    I know Milo is not a popular figure here on CF, but I heard him mention something similar recently and he attributed it to "The Pill" that Western sluts start taking almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old when they are still forming and developing as a human beings and females.

    "The Pill" suppresses female hormones and their feminine biological chemistry and allows more masculine characteristics to develop. Not that I would ever be attracted to a contemporary Brit female or the vast majority of Western females today, but if I were younger and in Britain and "felt the urge", I would still definitely do a crotch-grab test just to make sure it was "junk-free" and wasn't some Boy George impersonator.
     
  8. DixieDestroyer

    DixieDestroyer Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    9,196
    Location:
    Dixieland
    I’d venture to guess that 65-75% of “White” females from the ages of 18 - 24 are of (very) low moral turpitude. From what I hear from my oldest kids (in HS), most of the HS age girls (50%+) have lost their virginity. That is a much higher percentage from my HS days (circa 1980s). While a majority aren’t sluts per se (multiple partners), they’re not chaise (as all single gals should be).
     
  9. Romulus

    Romulus Newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2015
    Messages:
    66
    I always think it's hilarious how the overwhelming majority of white women buy-into the feminist 'slut-walk', 'my body my choice' cult while simultaneously dressing like scantily-clad, soulless wh0res. This as they accuse any and all white alpha males (white men with normal testosterone levels) of being 'rapists', but let swarms of aggressive brown men have their way with them. The sexual revolution was a devastating broadside against the West, and the photos above is merely more evidence of this...
     
  10. Rebajlo

    Rebajlo Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,501
    Location:
    N.S.W. - Australia
    Heretic -

    “Milo” isn’t a popular figure here on Caste Football? Is a part-Jewish poofter who “married” a ni@@er somehow supposed to be popular with conservative-minded White blokes? Perhaps I’m missing something…

    Anyway, here’s “Milo”:

    [​IMG]

    Come to think of it, I’m sure the Men Going Their Own Way types love the above photos. After all, they don’t feature any women, do they…

    Your charming habit of using “sluts” and “whores” as synonyms for females reminds me of a fellow I know. Funnily enough, the fellow in question has never had a girlfriend in his life. He professes a fanatically Puritanical morality yet is addicted to porn (but only “the ultra-hard-core stuff that really degrades women to the maximum”), spends endless hours in strip clubs, and occasionally frequents brothels. He’s “racially aware” and embarks upon lengthy rants denouncing female “race traitors” but has on occasion “consorted” with Asian prostitutes. Several years ago he admitted that his frustrations have led to his sexual fantasies exclusively featuring brutal rape of the “sluts who think they’re too good for him”. Incidentally, like you, he also delights in referencing the “barn scene” in High Plains Drifter.

    Naturally, he still hasn’t figured out why he “can’t meet anyone”…

    When your perceptions are shaped by sensationalist tabloid articles which - by their very nature - focus on the very worst behaviour in the nation then sure, you’ll have a thoroughly skewed view of British women and shall subscribe to the notion that all of them are nothing but drunken slags who vomit on their bare, tattooed, nipple-pierced tits while unsteadily squatting to piss in a convenient doorway before stumbling away to suck off the nearest chav, ni@@er, or horse.

    I readily admit that the UK - particularly England - has a far higher than average proportion of females who make pigs of themselves on a regular basis. No arguments there. But statements such as “Not that I would ever be attracted to a contemporary Brit female…” or booth's “Is it me but does [sic] all British women look like Boy George?” (http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/new-year’s-disgrace.36562/#post-715501) are absurd. Not only are they absurd - they are outright insulting.

    Here’s a bit of advice. Take a break from Vladimir Putin encomium tubes, Men’s Rights websites and niche “alt-right” lifestyle blogs churned out in industrial volumes by lonely, bitter, prematurely balding erectile dysfunction merchants who’ve never dipped the wick in their miserable, basement-confined lives. If you actually visit the UK you’ll discover that not every “Brit” or “limey” female is a disgusting trollop who pisses, sh!ts, spews, and copulates on the f##ing pavement.

    Should you take a leisurely stroll around - let’s say - Oxford, you’ll cop constant eyefuls of some of the most arrestingly beautiful, refined, and elegantly dressed young ladies on the planet. The only crotch you’ll be grabbing is your own - once you’re safely back behind the securely locked door and drawn blinds of the hotel, that is. But I suspect that a discerning gentleman of your stratospherically demanding standards would manage to find fault with the appearance of even these ladies. Perhaps they wouldn’t be “feminine” enough for you. Or maybe their clear enunciation makes them sound irritatingly “educated” and therefore not quite the necessarily dumb yet conspicuously stunning housewife material you appear to be questing for with such obvious success.

    Just out of interest, are you attracted to any White females? Ah, silly question, for I’ll wager you’d just love to marry (because we cannot lie with a woman before marriage, can we - that would be abhorrent - unless, of course, we are “honestly” screwing a prostitute, that is…) one of those sexy, big-titted, demure, submissive, piously moral, and staunchly pro-White floral-apron-clad Russian or “eastern European” virgins that are apparently so plentiful beyond the porous borders of “the West”. Wouldn’t that be a dream scenario, eh? You could proudly show off your blonde-tressed - but modestly dressed - Holy Grail to the semi-pro masturbators of the “men’s rights activism” fraternity (where every second sentence doubtlessly begins with “I’m not a f@g or anything, but…”).

    Do you actually believe that people did not binge drink - or engage in pre-marital sex - prior to the mid-1980s or thereabouts? Sorry to disappoint you, but the urban “lower classes” have always fornicated and drank themselves into oblivion down the ages. If social media had existed and mobile phones equipped with digital cameras had been available back in the “halcyon” days of the fifties, sixties, and seventies we would see many photos not too dissimilar to the ones posted in this thread. The difference being that most of it would not have occurred on the streets but in private residences and low-end pubs. Sure, the sheer scale and intensity of such vulgarity is far greater today but that’s largely the result of a much higher feckless "proletarian" population, the universal availability of credit and welfare, the almost complete absence of a socio-cultural shame mechanism, and a lack of strict law enforcement based on the threat of immediate government-sanctioned physical violence delivered by police coupled with guaranteed custodial punishments. The paucity of social shaming and disappearance of comminatory policing and sentencing ensure that crass antisocial behaviour spills out from the confines of the home, pub, or club (the equivalent of the historical dancehall) and becomes highly visible in public places.

    Surely everyone here is aware of the rampant alcoholism that blights both the societal fabric and productivity of eastern European nations, particularly Russia. Yes, that’s correct. Your “alt-right”-revered paradise of Russia is crawling, sprawling, and bawling with drunks all year round, not just on New Year’s Eve. Or is that another one of those little inconvenient truths that you choose to ignore because they don’t quite correspond with your preferred ideological paradigm?

    Here’s a tanked up Russian “lady” arrogantly running her mouth to Belarusian police. Incidentally, she peremptorily tells them that she’s in her own territory, the implication being that Belarus is part of Russia:



    Thankfully, the following paragons of Russian courtly refinement don’t have to put up with us backward Anglo-Saxons:



    Is this Russian girl “hot” enough housewife material for you?



    How about this one? You won’t find too many “Brit” females who can match those looks and that natural flair for fashion. Marvel as our inbred Russian Romeo demonstrates the fine art of dance floor (or, in this case, dance dirt) seduction, spitting then wiping his filthy gob at 0:23. Pure class…



    If only the British were as cultured and scientifically inquisitive as these strikingly handsome chaps…



    The photo below was taken in Saint Petersburg and captures a ubiquitous feature of urban Russia: drunks of all ages crumpled in doorways, sprawled across public benches and footpaths, and huddled in bus shelters. Like many of their “colleagues”, this pair have probably vomited and pissed themselves - just look at the woman covering her nose and mouth in disgust. By the way, the women in the shot are far more representative of the types you’ll see walking around Russian streets than your Sharapova fantasies. For what it’s worth, I am of the opinion that Sharapova has a peasant face and is probably one of the most overrated “beauties” of contemporary popular culture. And that’s saying something…

    [​IMG]

    Over in another thread (http://castefootball.us/index.php?t...allegations-going-on.36543/page-2#post-715784) you stated that...

    Flint provided an excellent response. As he said, it has to be experienced

    But - once again - what the f##k do I know? I’m just a bloke who’s in a healthy, long-term relationship with a woman and who has never paid for sex in his life. Perhaps I don’t spend enough time on the internet reading blogs written by homos, closet homos, and embittered 40+ virgin losers who haven’t been able to crack a non-drug-assisted fat since sometime in 1989 but are nevertheless monumental authorities on the subject of male-female “relationships”…

    I guess the Deep Red Pill isn’t for me. Oh well, that’s my “loss”. I’ll simply stick to swiving my lady and shall “reluctantly” leave the whores, sex-bots, inflatable dolls, gang bang porn, hypocritical “morality”, therapeutic misogyny, and bleak loneliness to far wiser men…
     
  11. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    22,138
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Passionate explanations of one's viewpoint are welcome, but flaming other posters is not. Let's keep it respectful and not get personal.
     
  12. Heretic

    Heretic Master

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,781
    Well, it certainly does takes a “genius” (or a “holier-than-thou” pretentious and sanctimonious know-it-all bloke like yourself) to be able to take a few anecdotal observations that I’ve made on this site and extrapolate that to my entire life’s “experience”, history, philosophy or current personal situation and what I’ve been through.

    Nice to know that I’m “living in your head” though that you’d make such a lengthy “rebuttal”, no matter how obtuse and bereft of nuance it is…and, of course, accuracy. Perhaps you’ve had one too many pints of Pacific Ale? Personally, I prefer the Boris Imperial Stout, it’s a Russian Imperial Stout, ya know. Who would’ve guessed?

    I’m not going to address all of your fallacious and unwarranted personal attacks, but as far Milo is concerned, just because I don’t agree with his lifestyle doesn’t mean I don’t disagree with many of the things he’s said. Are you really that f*cking obtuse or just drunk? Put down the g*ddamned pint and wipe the slop off your mouth. If you're off your meds, get back on them; if you aren't on any, consider taking some.

    He’s perfectly correct on “The Pill” and I’ve personally stated that long before he did. It inhibits female hormones and bodily chemistry thus giving them more masculine characteristics, especially when taken at an early age (like many do in the West) when they are still developing. They almost stop bleeding completely during menstruation as I’ve “experienced” with past girlfriends of mine (all White, by the way, but that's none of your f*cking business anyhow now is it?)

    I don’t ever recall attacking anyone personally on this site nor given them any reason to attack me. I’ve had some strong opinions and positions on some things and there’s not much I’d change. Resorting to ad-hominem attacks is usually the result of not having a cogent argument to rebut with, but when you have the mindset of a “holier-than-thou” pretentious and sanctimonious know-it-all, why should you even have to try?
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2018
  13. booth

    booth Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2015
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    n.c.
    MAN if you are going to insult me please use smaller words because i don't know what the hell you were talking about most of your post. All I do know is you know more about queers and whores than any thing i have learn in 66 yrs onthis earth. What the hell is a sex-bot?
     
  14. Rebajlo

    Rebajlo Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,501
    Location:
    N.S.W. - Australia
    Don -

    I apologise if I’ve lowered the tone of your forum but please take a moment to consider the following…

    Whenever Heretic either states or implies that all women are - by their very nature - nothing but parasitic de facto whores he is by default “flaming” my lady, my mother, and the wives, girlfriends, mothers, sisters, daughters, nieces, et cetera of every one of our members. His most recent comments about prostitution are drifting into BoxingSpecialist territory.

    If Heretic wishes to coarsely calumniate the females of an entire nation, then good luck to him - but he should expect that someone may eventually make a few "observations" of their own. I asserted that he should perhaps rely less upon blindly pro-Russian alt-right sites, Men Going Their Own Way type blogs run by guys who - for a wide spectrum of reasons both real and imagined - harbour acres of undisguised grievances, and tabloids published by fellows whose names he would normally enclose in triple parentheses and instead take a look at UK women for himself. Heretic had made a crude crack about “grabbing crotches” - I merely reversed it. If he loads the figurative gun with ammunition, chances are someone shall fire it.

    I’ll admit that I went in a bit hard but - as I mentioned above - Heretic’s self-righteous sermonising about Western women as a whole and British women in particular is plain insulting.

    Check out Heretic’s reply to my post. A lot about me being a “holier-than-thou pretentious and sanctimonious know-it-all” along with a quaint denunciation of ad hominem attacks but nothing about comparative levels of British and Russian drunkenness or those sweeping generalisations about the women of a nation he has probably never set foot in.

    Can I ask a boon and kindly request that you permit the discussion / argument to continue. We are all adults here and if the gloves are dropped I’m certain we can honourably settle it on the ice according to Original Six-era methods with minimal interference by the referees… ;)
     
  15. Heretic

    Heretic Master

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,781
    Here's a recent article from the Daily Mail that says 27% of Millenials would prefer a robot "lover" over a flesh and blood human being. It was linked to from Rush Limbaugh's web site.

    Limbaugh's take:

    It’s creating psychological problems, and that’s why people report that they “prefer their social media lives to their real ones…. 70% said that smartphones are weakening human bonds.” Anyway, the big number here is 27% would replace a human being with a robot for sex. Just telling you I predicted it. I fairly recently predicted this. Amidst all this sexual harassment stuff and all the rape allegations and all that. Clean it up. You know, get a robot and that stuff’s not possible. Pure and simple. We’re talking Millennials here.

    Personally, I think it's important to understand why this is happening (because it's not good for the future of Western Civilization) instead of just making some callous or trite remark which doesn't help create a solution. Limbaugh's probably partially right, but then so is Don in regards to the transhumanism movement.

    KEY FINDINGS
    - 27% of 18-34 year olds would form a relationship with a robot

    - British men were three times more likely to form a relationship with a robot compared to women

    - Men are also more likely than women to prefer their social media lives to their real ones

    - 70% said that smartphones are weakening human bonds

    - 42% of 18-34 year olds report feeling depressed or unhappy after seeing other people's lives online

    - 40% of people aged between 18 and 34 are concerned that robots will take their jobs


    Now, excuse me while I go get mine from the closet...
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2018
  16. Rebajlo

    Rebajlo Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,501
    Location:
    N.S.W. - Australia
    I’m a “‘holier-than-thou’ pretentious and sanctimonious know-it-all” am I? That’s interesting…because I’m not the rancorous fellow who habitually lectures everyone - including married men and those in long-term relationships - about the connate wickedness of women and the subsequent inevitable doom of the male-female sexual-emotional nexus.

    You priggishly bemoan the collapse of morality and the naturally complementary male-female symbiosis but state that the most “honest” relationship between a man and a woman is that of a male client and female prostitute because the very morality and natural complementary symbiosis whose passing you mourn was always mere “window dressing” anyway. Are you sure you’re not BoxingSpecialist/2/3/etc’s long-lost cousin or something…

    Don’t worry, Mr. Relationship Counsellor, you’re not “living in my head”. I have infinitely more interesting things to think about than you. You’re just a lonely, frustrated, emotionally fractured bloke who appears to make several posts a day on a forum I visit a couple of times a week.

    I’m not obtuse, tough guy. I just knew that the part about the poof Yiannopoulos would rile you up. ’Twas also amusingly predictable that you’d choose to limit your response to stating that you don’t agree with his “lifestyle” but share many of his political and philosophical opinions instead of commenting upon the other 95% of my post whose central subjects were that of comparative British and Russian drunkenness and the ill-informed generalisations you made about the women of a country you’ve probably never set foot in.

    I’m sure everyone here is aware of how contraceptive pills work. I’ve always earnestly discouraged girls from taking “the pill” due to the deleterious effects it can have on their health. I suppose that makes me a “sensitive” wimp in your "real man's world". But you’re probably convinced that the “sluts” are all on the pill from the second they’ve “flowered”, which is when they start shagging everyone in sight. Your assertions that women aren’t “feminine enough” and that you can walk about and see hundreds of females yet not be physically attracted to a single one speaks more about your fantasy expectations than anything else.

    Given your presumably demanding standards of female physical beauty, you must be an unbelievably handsome, classically chiselled matinee idol yourself...

    Nice touch to mention your past girlfriends, though. Plural. Oooh, highly impressive. So, which one of them screwed you over or said something that busted your tender heart into a million jagged pieces? Don’t worry, nobody - me included - is expecting an answer to that rhetorical question...

    But yeah - Haw! Haw! I must be drunk - on Pacific Ale to boot - and perhaps I should take some meds. That was really funny. Make sure to list “great sense of humour” on your dating site profiles…

    Before you decry the evils of ad hominem attacks and launch a few limp-d!cked attempts of your own, ponder the content of the rest of this paragraph for a moment or two. Statements like:

    and

    are insulting to me, my lady, all other Caste Football members, and their wives and girlfriends. You are, for all intents and purposes, insisting that everyone’s wife or girlfriend is a biological parasite who is only with them because they can “provide” and that if the said “provision” ceases, so does the relationship. That may have been your personal experience but just because you happen to be psychologically unable to establish or maintain a profound emotional bond with a woman does not automatically exclude the existence of “love”. When Flint replied to your post, he wasn’t getting “emotional” or “trying to make it personal”. He was only stating the truth.

    You’re lonely. ’Tis unfortunate. You’re disgruntled. Nothing wrong with that. You’ve been shafted emotionally, financially, or both. My sincere commiserations. But don’t project your own failures, failings, and frustrations onto everyone else. The reality of your “relationships” (or, more accurately, your lack thereof…) and “situation” is not that of the majority of people, either on Caste Football or in wider society.

    You are blindly, solipsistically, and obsessively convinced that your opinions about women and the nature of male-female relations are axiomatic. In that sense, you’re possibly the most sanctimonious “know-it-all” on this site. You’re just too conceited and indignant to even realise it, let alone acknowledge it…

    Here’s a fundamental difference between you and I: I despise “feminism” whereas you despise women.

    But what do I and millions of men down the centuries know anyway? You know it all. You have swallowed the Deep Red Pill. Perhaps you should patent its ingredients, bitter as they are. Silly me - you already have…

    Don’t forget to make a donation to that Youtube favourite of yours whose Paypal address is “allwomenarewhores”…
     
  17. Rebajlo

    Rebajlo Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,501
    Location:
    N.S.W. - Australia
    booth -

    Sorry, sir. I’ll employ demotic language next time. ;)

    I wasn’t aware that I was insulting you.

    Heretic has already filled you in about sex bots. He was the one posting about them, not I…
     
  18. Heretic

    Heretic Master

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,781
    We aren’t going to see eye-to-eye no matter what. And, however much I indirectly and unintentionally insulted you with some of my posts I think you’ve more than made up for that with your direct attack and insults on me.

    In my mind, you fall into the blue-pill category (no offense at all, and I’m sure, none taken) where I’m more of a red-pill person, and they simply don’t see things the same way. So, I can’t see you changing my mind nor me yours. So there’s simply nothing to “debate”. You can mock those terms all you want, it doesn't matter to me.

    But, of course, you continue to misconstrue my position on prostitution by comparing me to BoxingSpecialist, so I will have to mention that again. My position remains that it’s probably the most “honest” interaction between the male and female species, considering their default nature. That was simply an observation that I made at a point in time based upon some anecdotal observations in that I’ve gathered from the media as well from human behavior and their primary motivations. It may rub people the wrong way or people may disagree with that and that's fine...it's just my opinion and I'm entitled to it.

    So, feel free to state whatever your opinions are on these or any other matters, as always. I’ll may read them, but if you direct them at me expecting me to respond, I won’t.
     
  19. Heretic

    Heretic Master

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,781
    You can speculate and hysterically rant like an unhinged madman all you want and pat yourself on the back for it, but that's all it is. You are probably used to bullying people into submission if they don't agree with you but those tactics don't work on me, but feel free to continue to try...and that doesn't make me a "tough guy". You still don't know me, no matter how much you try to convince yourself or others, but you certainly seem obsessed. I've had women obsessed with me before but never a man.

    I’m actually pretty happy and content, for the most part…nothing's perfect, but I'm healthy, financially stable, in decent physical shape. etc. I have very few worries and am enjoying life. You’re the one ranting and raving over very inconsequential stuff. I hope everything is OK with the wife.

    I know insulting people or speaking with an air of condescension, not only to me, but to others here at CF, is a staple of yours, but it doesn't really matter to me as you're the one that comes off looking poorly for doing it. I owe you no explanations and I offer no apologies for any perceived slight. I have my opinions and I will state them as long as I'm welcome here, in good health, and they fall within the guidelines of this site. Nothing of what you say that you think will get to me does. If you understood red-pilled people, you’d understand that. On cue, feel free to mock.

    One more thing...I'm not the only one that posts here almost daily, many people do. There are some great posters here and I've learned a lot of new things from them. I appreciate the time they take to do it. It replaces much of the time I previously spent reading or watching some television. Impugning me with that statement impugns them as well. But, again, you can’t see that because you are simply too obtuse to notice.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2018
  20. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    22,138
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Rebajlo, I enjoy reading Heretic's posts on all topics, including feminism and its many toxic effects, and I've never once thought that he was "implying" that "all women are whores," much less do I recall him stating it explicitly. I also post a lot about feminism and how it's negatively affected women and society, but when I write, say, "women have declined," or "women are much more slutty than they used to be," I am talking in generalities, not condemning every single woman. Obviously, there are still traditional White women left, and there are still beautiful White women left, but there are less than there used to be and the number keeps dropping as far as I can tell. That's a tragedy of the highest order, and it needs to be discussed and analyzed so that if possible it can be halted and reversed.

    I don't see anything in the world more harmful these days than feminism's contrived "gender war" against men. It's harmful to men, women, children, the traditional family unit, and healthy White societies. When feminism is essentially a state religion backed by law to enforce it, it does indeed unleash and sanctify the worst of female behavior, not to mention how it is also encouraged and rewarded by the media. Men used to be able to check and control woman's nature; we can't anymore unless we want to risk a pretty good chance of going to jail or being raped in divorce court.

    Regardless, one's opinion on this topic has nothing to do with one's ability to get laid. Heretic never mentioned you, yet you decided to make your rebuttal personal with a barrage of insults. If you don't think feminism is and has been detrimental to femininity and the mental and physical health of women, then defend that position without insulting anyone.

    BTW, I enjoy your posts as well, I'm sure if I met you or Heretic we could enjoy a few drinks together. Let's keep things respectful.
     
  21. white is right

    white is right Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    7,966
    I think it's something imprinted in our brains about attractive potential mates.

    As nearly everyone in Western countries has gained tremendous weight in the last 30 plus years a women who isn't close to a model in looks can't pull of a feminine look while being close to 25 pounds overweight. Many obese young women do look like men in drag with doughy bodies, ie male transvestites in the 40's+
     
  22. Heretic

    Heretic Master

    Joined:
    May 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,781
    This is not an apology, but simply a personal disclaimer if I should make, or in the past have ever made, a general observation about females or women. It is sincere.

    Personal Disclaimer:
    My statement does not in any way apply to any female poster on this site, sympathetic female lurker, or any female that is an immediate or extended family member or relative of a poster on this site, dead or alive. Nor does it in any way pertain to any girlfriend of any. In addition, this statement applies to any male poster that is currently going through a transitioning process to become female, tranny or anything in-between that may be construed to be female or if you have any immediate or extended family member or relative that is transitioning to become female. Nor does it in any way pertain to any girlfriend of any such circumstance.

    I wanted to be explicitly inclusive on that because I don't know what folk's personal situation is or that of their extended relatives or family members.


    I encourage others to come up with their own personal disclaimers on any subject matter they feel others may take personal offense to, even if it’s a general observation, which implies that there are always exceptions and not meant to apply to any particular individual. We should do all we can to make sure this a “safe space” for all participants no matter how near or far they are, dead or alive.

    I’ll also include a PSA (Public Service Announcement), for good measure, to balance things out:
    “Censorship is a slippery slope”
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2018
  23. booth

    booth Guru

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2015
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    n.c.
    Thank you that will help a simple man like me. My mistake on the sex bots.
     
  24. werewolf

    werewolf Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,440


    Young American women are just as feminine and sweet and attractive as they ever were...

    [​IMG]
     
  25. Rebajlo

    Rebajlo Mentor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,501
    Location:
    N.S.W. - Australia
    Don -

    Yes, you often post about feminism and its negative effects upon women and society but your language and tone doesn’t drip with organic, misogynistic virulence and frustration. Of course you are speaking in generalities when you make statements such the ones you used as examples. That’s a given. But nobody can possibly deny that Heretic has an abysmally low opinion of women. I don’t believe even Heretic himself would disagree with me there…

    Take a look at the following quotation…

    http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/ultimate-cucks.35904/page-2#post-713665

    Here he replied to a post about an “ultimate cuck” candidate, stating that “Fertile fembots won’t be available for probably another ten years, so that’s not a possibility for any man right now in his [i.e. the “cuck’s”] situation (which is just about every Western man nowadays)”.

    So, according to Heretic, “just about every Western man” is in the same “situation”. Really? Which “situation” is that? Choosing to marry hard-core feminists due to the presumable unavailability of Western women who aren’t hard-core feminists? Or having to endure the lack of “options” for having a child without a wife or girlfriend due to the exorbitant cost of a “decent” surrogate “host” and the unavailability of “fertile fembots”?

    He proceeds to observe that “Tim Tebow is still unmarried and Prince Harry was just engaged to an average looking mulatto who’s been previously married. These are all highly-successful, wealthy, heterosexual men who, obviously, even have very few options. That says an awful lot about the state of Western White women today or just Western women in general, does it not? Am I missing something”

    I’d say he’s missing quite a lot.

    You and all of the other American members obviously know far more about Tebow than I do but - in my opinion - the bloke is a milksop multiculturalist “Christian” do-gooder whose rigid belief in complete abstention from pre-marital sex has without doubt distorted his perception of, and expectations from, a “relationship” and shall continue to do so. The longer he maintains his abstemious “streak”, the more those perceptions and expectations shall be unhealthily warped. He is probably convinced that God shall eventually “provide” him with a breathtakingly beautiful “model” or “cheerleader” virgin who shares his beliefs. Good luck with that. Tebow has also stated that he wants to adopt a child from every continent. Regardless of the man’s money and fame, the articulation of such an absurd desire to adopt multiple children of different races solely for “spiritually” philanthropic reasons is enough to put almost all women off, even the pitifully deluded two-church-services-every-Sunday types whose charity wall calendars feature photos of grinning Negro brats posing beside water pumps. The only females who’d be interested in participating in such madness would be the kind whose fanatical “faith” is necessarily proportional to their physical unattractiveness. You know, the ugly, perennially rejected, psychologically crushed, “involuntary” virgin “Save The Children” missionaries who nobody bar a pervert will touch and who seek solace and self-validation in performing what they believe are “good deeds”. But I’m sure Tebow isn’t interested in such a “soul mate”, is he…

    As for Prince Harry, that privileged twat could have had his pick of glamorous aristocratic females or - for that matter - beautiful upper-class girls from the length and breadth of the British Isles and Europe. Anyone who believes that a f#@king prince of the realm has “very few options” must have proverbial rocks in his head.

    Prince Harry’s choice of fiance has nothing to do with “the state of Western White women” and has everything to do with his own so-called “progressive” worldview, which is something he inherited from his Paki and Arab loving mother. I’m sure the prick is enjoying sticking his middle finger up at the “establishment” which he doubtlessly blames for the demise the late Princess of Wales. Incidentally, I always told my mother that Harry would end up marrying a non-White woman. My Mum thought I was mad but - when his “relationship” with Markle came to light - she quickly admitted that my seemingly preposterous prediction had been unerringly accurate. Sadly, I was also correct almost three decades ago when I predicted that one of my two best friends would eventually marry an Asian woman…

    Despite the need for a lot of cash and the fact that “jobs for foreigners aren’t easy to come by”, perhaps Heretic himself should “go overseas” or move to eastern Europe or Russia. But more on eastern European and Russian women later…

    Odds on you won’t remember this - after all, why would you, as the forum contains almost 378,000 posts - but I once amicably attempted to broach the subject of Heretic’s insistence that he hardly ever sees any good looking or “feminine” girls anymore:

    http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/we-are-living-in-a-cartoon.15495/page-20#post-694229

    Yet no response was forthcoming. Fair enough, he might have missed it. As I said, there are a lot of posts being made on a daily basis so questions can easily become lost, particularly if someone takes a break from the forum for a while.

    Several months later, I made another - noticeably less amicable but nevertheless non-aggressive or insulting - attempt to engage him upon the same subject. I even politely pointed out that I had asked a similar question before:

    http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/men-these-days.36101/page-2#post-702146

    No response...

    In the past, certain members have on occasion lambasted me for the length of my posts. I don’t post very often but when I do, I take the time to try to address every point an interlocutor raises or every question which is put to me, no matter how awkward or insulting. It’s too bad that a minute number of posters reply selectively or simply choose to ignore “inconvenient” questions. You have doubtlessly noted my latest fruitless endeavours to elicit responses to that “thorny” and oft-repeated question pertaining to Hitler’s Generalplan Ost

    Heretic’s declarations about “Western sluts” starting to take the pill “almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old” and that he would never “be attracted to a contemporary Brit female or the vast majority of Western females today” plus the “crotch grab” comment infuriated me to the point that I felt compelled to dish a serve back.

    Heretic never even referred to the main body of my initial post, which pointed out that alcoholism is far more rampant and destructive in eastern Europe and Russia than it is in the UK. In fact, nobody did. I’m sure that had I posted a few videos of drunken English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Australian, American, or Canadian people - particularly young females - certain members would in all probability have gleefully chimed in with derisive comments about the disgusting and degenerate behaviour in the decadent West, especially within the Anglosphere. But as the video footage and photo were of incredibly primitive Russian drunkards and uncouth young Russian females the silence was predictably deafening.

    Some of our lads appear to be under the impression that Russian and “eastern European” women are made of an almost fabulously superior moral fibre to that of “Western” girls, the “majority” of whom are supposedly no different to the slags initially featured in this thread. Beautiful Russian and eastern European women don’t drink to excess, don’t smoke, don’t have tattoos, and don’t sleep around. They’re “traditional”. They’re not materialistic. They’re pro-White. All of which makes them dream marriage material and a refreshing antidote to feminism-infected “Anglo” women.

    At the risk of sounding like a “pretentious, sanctimonious, know-it-all”, that’s simply a load of bollocks, complete with a bonus dose of jock rot. Why? Because I’ve lived in Poland and seen “eastern European” women in action. My opinions aren’t based upon the tendentious blogs of Putin-idealising US alt-right purveyors of wishful thinking nor the propaganda tubes of ultra-jingoistic Russians who imperiously claim that everything Russian is superior to everything in the West simply because it is Russian. If you think that your “DWF” Americans with their chants of “USA! USA! USA!” are mindlessly chauvinistic, you’d be utterly appalled when directly exposed to Russian “nationalists” - particularly once they’ve loosened up after sinking a bit of booze, which instantly evaporates what little inhibitions they may have. But I digress. You may recall I once wrote that if the Western men who extol the traditional, “feminism-free” virtues of Russian and eastern European women were exposed to a cross section of “above average looking” females in that part of the world they would doubtlessly suffer an erection-softening shock at the attitudes of entitlement and hauteur prevalent among the objects of their desire. Well, that’s an understatement…

    I’ve never claimed that feminism is not - or has not been - detrimental to femininity, et cetera so I have absolutely no need to defend such a position. In fact, it can safely be said that I probably abhor feminism far more than most “Western” blokes, perhaps even a small portion of the hard-core men’s rights fanatics. The difference - as I wrote in my last post - is that I don’t hate women. That may sound like an absurd and almost heretical concept to many of the embittered MGTOW types, but my attitudes toward - and experiences with - the fairer sex are maybe just a touch different to theirs. Allow me to elaborate…

    Down the years, a significant number of women of certain sensibilities have readily referred to me as an anachronism - a modern-day incarnation of an old-style gentleman. Depending on the romanticised “archetypes” of their individual literary and artistic tastes, they have labelled me a Regency, Victorian or Edwardian “gentleman”, or even an “Arthurian knight”. My lady, for instance, says that upon our first meeting she perceived me as “the perfect English gentleman” - and that’s even before I dropped in my first quotation from Shelley’s Queen Mab… ;)

    ’Tis all pure whimsical fancy on the part of the females in question, of course, but the point I’m making should be quite transparent. I cannot - and have never been able to - abide vulgar, loud-mouthed, bumptious, and slatternly women, particularly those who try to emulate the crass behaviour of men or who evince masculine attitudes. Furthermore, although I take great pride in primarily judging women upon their virtues and intelligence, I have been cursed by a lifelong obsession with female beauty which mayhap borders on pathological aestheticism. Tattoos, “piercings”, mannish - or even very short - coiffures, and shabby, painfully inelegant “clothing” turn my stomach. The wider social and civilisational implications of so-called “feminist” doctrines are both unambiguously clear and utterly repellent. But - once again - I may hate feminism, but I don’t hate, dismiss, or deride women as some sort of biologically evil parasites or de facto prostitutes.

    We live in the world of today and hence must operate within the parameters of the present, distasteful as those parameters may be. It’s all well and good to constantly complain about how things are now worse than they were thirty, forty, fifty, or sixty years ago and how the decline of Western cultural and social structures and mores coupled with the destructive, ever-expanding progress of feminism has made it increasingly difficult to find a “decent” woman. But we can choose to react to the current environment in a couple of ways. One can curl up into a little thumb-sucking ball and resignedly wallow in the inescapable hopelessness of it all while imagining how things “should” be and fantasising about the bevies of stunningly beautiful, charmingly wholesome women who would have been 100% guaranteed to throw themselves at one’s feet back in the good old pre-feminist days in which everything was perfect and relationship problems never existed. Deucedly productive attitude, that. Jolly good for the health. Or…one can take the more difficult approach and actually try to make something of the potential “relationship” opportunities life presents one with.

    Of course, there isn’t exactly a surfeit of women who are either consciously pro-White or who subscribe to - let’s say - the strictly defined gender roles of the 1950s. There are even less who “fulfil” both of those “essential” criteria. What a ******* disaster, eh. ;) Perhaps it’s time to reach for a handy licensed firearm and end it all. But our big bad world is packed full of White women who can perchance be dissuaded from adhering to the damaging feminist or quasi-feminist attitudes they have been indoctrinated into or who can be persuaded to become pro-White. It isn’t always easy - in fact, it’s never easy at all - but it can be done. Who else but White men can initially stem and eventually reverse the seemingly unstoppable tide of feminist / Cultural Marxist / et cetera thought? But it certainly shan’t be achieved by sitting around griping, will it. If “disgruntled”, “racially conscious” White men expect to miraculously encounter plenty of ready-made, highly attractive pro-White women with the mentality of a 1950s housewife on a daily basis, well, it’s no surprise that they are highly disappointed with life.

    When White men simply withdraw from the lists and choose to immerse themselves in bitterly negative “men’s rights” and “men going their own way” online support groups (sorry - perhaps I should have referred to them as “communities”) then their fatalistic disaffections, suspicions, and fears become self-fulfilling prophecies and they shall remain single for the rest of their increasingly miserable and crushingly lonely lives.

    As you can see, I’m not a great fan of the oh-woe-is-me whining from blokes who seem to blame everything and everyone but themselves for being perennially single. “It’s not my fault - no f#@k’n way. The stuck up, materialistic sluts are to blame. F#@k’n molls, think they’re too good for me. Well they’re f#@k’n not! That’n the feminist bitches, the f#@k’n Hollywood Jews’n their leftist race traitor lackeys. I’d f#@k’n kick the sh!t outta the lot of ‘em. Yeah! There’s no such thing as love. It’s all bullsh!t ‘cause women are all selfish whores who just wanna milk ya dry.” (pause) “Cunts!” (pause) “Right, where are we off to tonight? We’ll start piss’n up at five, place a few bets on the footy, then head off to the strippers. Er, can ya lend me fifty bucks…”.

    I’ve related the story of my “courtship” of my lady on a previous occasion but I’ll summarise it again. When we met via work, she was very left-leaning, having been indoctrinated with the usual poison by the usual “professors” while at university. To top things off, she had grown up in a strict Protestant environment, complete with the standard indigestible fare of “tolerance” and love for innocently smiling Negroes and other dark-skinned “children of God” who - apart from the fact that they always “inexplicably” live in squalid poverty and perennially require White food and medical aid to survive - are “just like us”. But she was also extraordinarily warm, kind and intelligent and had appeared to take an instant liking to me so I decided to explore where things may lead. Now, the moment she declared that she didn’t like “racists” I could have simply decided to write her off as another well fit but instantly “unacceptable” girl before slinking off to post about this newest disappointment online. Instead, I inwardly winced before thinking “we’ll see” as I diverted the conversation away from politics and current events back to the safer topics of literature and the beauty of the English natural landscape.

    ’Twas only after we were “together” for a while that I began to ease into politics, generally through the conduit of my ostensibly innocent discourses about British history and culture. These served to sow the seeds of soon-to-be-used essential reference points of White identity, achievement, and tradition and the vital need to protect such priceless and unique European legacies. Once the necessary subtle discussions had taken place in order to cushion the inevitable, unavoidably heavy blow, I carefully - and nervously - picked my time and tactfully - and nervously - revealed and justified my racial philosophies, complete with an explanation of why I hadn’t mentioned any of this earlier. The poor girl was understandably quite shocked and - also understandably - less than impressed. But she didn’t run off screaming, never to return. Instead, she was open to listening as she knew I was a committed “nice guy” who loved her.

    Now, it’s quite self-evident that such a strategy shan’t always work. If a woman happens to be an ultra-hard-core, irredeemably brainwashed leftist / feminist in every sense of the words who is “active in the community” it’s not even remotely worth trying, regardless of the physical charms which may be on offer. Then again, who in their right mind is interested in those types anyway, no matter how loaded with sex appeal and raw intelligence those types may sometimes be. But most women cannot be classified within the aforementioned extreme category. Like most men, they fall prey to whatever propaganda is currently being disseminated by politicians, religious figures, the media and the various organs of “popular culture”, irrespective of its content. Unfortunately, that’s human nature in a nutshell. The majority of people require someone else to form their opinions for them because they either cannot or are too lazy to think for themselves and simply wish to “fit in”. Without even realising it, they need to be told what to wear, how to cut their hair, which music to listen to, which films to watch, which terms are acceptable, which terms should be censored, who or what to like and who or what to hate and fear. The human propensity for fickleness and succumbing to indoctrination may be intellectually contemptible but - conversely - it offers much hope for change and a potentially rapid reversal of prevalent political and cultural trends.

    I never said that Heretic’s opinion on the topic is related to his ability to get laid. But I do aver that many of the “men going their own way” bloggers and amateur psychologists are bleakly lonely, toxically bitter, obsessively vengeful, prematurely balding erectile dysfunction wimps and / or closet bisexuals or homos who’ve either never had any success with women or have suffered some sort of emotionally crippling “relationship” trauma or humiliation yet try to pass themselves off as magisterial authorities on male-female dynamics.

    In the case of Heretic, I drew a connection between his undeniably low opinion of women and an inability to establish or maintain a profound emotional bond with a woman - i.e. a loving, long-term relationship.

    I’ll add one final thought. Many of the men who currently find it either difficult or impossible to initiate contact with women or to maintain a relationship (healthy or otherwise) would experience similar problems in any age, be it today or back in the good old “pre-feminism” days of clear cut gender roles and svelter, well-dressed, tattoo-free ladies. Why? Not because of caustic feminism or any other external cultural factors but as a direct result of their maladjusted attitudes, their multifarious self-esteem issues, and their sheer natural distrust or loathing of women. I am acquainted with “racially aware”, permanently “single” fellows who incessantly carp about modern women being immoral, crass sluts and unfeeling, congenitally evil parasites simply because they couldn’t get anywhere with even the most desperate female if their lives depended on it…
     

Share This Page