Lawrence Auster RIP

Discussion in 'Happy Hour' started by davidholly, Mar 29, 2013.

  1. davidholly

    davidholly Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,678
    I'm sure most people on Caste Football have read a Lawrence Auster article at some point. Recently his site went inactive and today it was announced that he had passed away. Auster was one of the best people when it came to reporting on interracial crime and his commentary will be missed.
     
  2. jaxvid

    jaxvid Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,247
    Location:
    Michigan
    I often read his site. He was a clear and brave thinker. He will be missed. He was very religious and I hope he has gone to his final reward.
     
  3. Deus Vult

    Deus Vult Mentor

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Messages:
    634
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Auster will be missed. I didn't agree with him on all things, but there is no denying he was a fine writer and courageous commentator.
     
  4. sport historian

    sport historian Master

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    I had corresponded with Lawrence Auster since 2001. He once told me that he was a pretty big sports fan until the late 1960's, less so afterward. Baseball was Lawrence Auster's favorite sport.

    Auster didn't like the fat black and hispanic players in the current major leagues. He also disliked the loud music played when he occasionally went to games at Yankee Stadium.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2013
  5. Charles Martel

    Charles Martel Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    7,715
    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368

    The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States

    By: Lawrence Auster

    FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, May 03, 2007


    Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country.

    When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005.

    In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

    The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

    In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

    What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.


    The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

    Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen.... It's my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it's my job to prosecute the real thing."

    No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

    Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man." Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women's apartments on Manhattan's Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media's reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.
     
  6. davidholly

    davidholly Mentor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,678
    Auster never denied that most Jews were suicidal liberals. He just felt this was no different from most whites being suicidal liberals.
     
  7. sport historian

    sport historian Master

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    Auster and his commenters DID discuss the Jewish role.
     
  8. Kaptain

    Kaptain Master

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Then why did Auster protest David Duke's appearance at Amren and call him an anti-semite? I don't trust anybody who cries "anti-semite", but I don't much about this guy so maybe somebody can explain.
     
  9. sport historian

    sport historian Master

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    When you wrote "I don't much about this guy" did you mean "I don't KNOW much about this guy?"

    Google "View From The Right." Before his death Auster had arranged for his site to be kept on the web permanently.

    Once at VFR, go to Search and put in David Duke. Auster explained his opposition to Duke several times.
     
  10. Charles Martel

    Charles Martel Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    7,715
    It was just a typo, everybody makes a mistake like that from time to time (except perhaps for the superior "chosen people" like yourself).

    You seem to believe anyone who doesn't agree with your liberal views is an idiot. It seems in virtually every discussion you're insulting us, calling us stupid.

    Who are you? You're obviously not pro-white.

    By the way, it's spelled knowledgeable not "knowledgable". Are you the one who is dumb as a sack of hammers?
     
  11. Kaptain

    Kaptain Master

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Location:
    Minnesota
    He's good for spellcheck and TV guide. He just can't explain why Auster protested David Duke. You corresponded with Auster, you should just tell us all in a simple sentence or two. Simple question - no need for a smartarse spell check reply.
     
  12. Charles Martel

    Charles Martel Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    7,715
    Very good article here:

    Hoist by their own petard


    by Lawrence Auster

    As they work to dismantle America’s majority culture through mass immigration, diversity, the subversion of mainstream values, and the mainstreaming of countercultural values, those Jews who are waging the Kulturkampf have failed to realize that they are cutting off the civilization they are sitting on. Leftist Jews in particular are dumbfounded when the anti-Westernism they have been promoting recoils back upon themselves. Michael Lerner, for example, has repeatedly portrayed America as an evil oppressor nation—a “social system whose current distribution of wealth and power is based on the stealing of land from the American Indians, the enslavement of Blacks, the degradation of women, and the systematic exploitation of many generations of immigrants,†as he put it in a typical diatribe in his journal Tikkun. Yet elsewhere Lerner has expressed horror at the fact that nonwhite multiculturalists see the Jews as part of this oppressive white system. Blinded by his anti-majority passion, Lerner cannot understand that in contemporary America, where Jews (for their numbers) are the most wealthy and powerful group, nonwhites are hardly likely to see the Jews as an “oppressed†minority like themselves. ["Six Days Shalt Thou Work," Michael Lerner, Tikkun, Nov/Dec 1993, p. 35.]

    Similarly, Professor Susannah Heschel, writing in Tikkun, was shocked that among liberal Germans who are friendly to Jews, there is a broad acceptance of anti-Semitic ideas. It seems that these contemporary Germans view the Old Testament as the fulminating source of contemporary injustices, including Nazism, since the Jewish Bible condones authoritarianism, exclusion, racism, and genocide. But Heschel has it all wrong. She assumes that leftist Germans are asserting anti-Jewish ideas, when in fact they are only repeating the generic anti-Westernism that has been disseminated so effectively by progressive Jews such as Heschel herself. Since Germans have been taught to see the West as hegemonic, warlike, and racist, isn’t it only natural that they would also view one of [the] primary sources of the West—the Hebrew Bible—in exactly the same terms?

    While the absence of self-awareness among Jewish leftists is only laughable, the blindness of the mainstream Jewish community is a serious matter. In their tireless campaign for mass immigration and cultural diversity—motivated by conscious or unconscious hostility to the white Christian majority—Jews are helping destroy the very way of life that made a happy Jewish existence in this country possible. Despite some anti-Jewish prejudice and social exclusions in the early twentieth century, Jews found in America a stable environment where they were protected, where they prospered, and where they felt fully comfortable for the first time in two thousand years. That environment was a white society with a Christian religion and an Anglo-Saxon code of conduct. As America becomes nonwhite and non-Western, will that code, and those protections, endure? As Alan Mittleman argues,

    “The breakdown of a common culture and the drift toward multiculturalism, which Jews support, pose real hazards for American Jews, because they weaken the citizenship on which Jewish participation in modern society is based…. If people revert to more primordial forms of belonging, civil society will dissolve and American Jews might find themselves in what the prophet Ezekiel called a midbar hammim, a wilderness of the peoples. This would be a nightmarish denouement.†[Alan L. Mittleman, "Jews in Multicultural America," First Things, December 1996, p. 17.]

    One notable feature of this coming “wilderness of peoples,†in which Jews will lose all security, is the black racialism that is rising as the dominant white culture declines. In the lawless Third-World America of the coming century, do Jews think they will be able to count on Dominicans and Chinese and Arabs and Mexicans to protect them from black anti-Semites?

    Another prospect emerging from the wilderness of peoples will be an upsurge of anti-Semitism among marginalized whites, many of whom will blame the Jews (not without cause) for the ruin of white civilization. Having acted all along on the ludicrous and hostile assumption that the white American majority is a potential neo-Nazi force that must be dispossessed, Jews will hardly be in a position to complain about real anti-Semitism when it appears among whites who have actually been dispossessed.

    In failing to consider these possibilities, pro-immigration Jews are as unthinking as pro-immigration blacks. Both blacks and Jews support a policy that is leading to the end of white America, even though that will remove from power the only group that has a cultural bond or moral obligation to them…
     
  13. sport historian

    sport historian Master

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    Since you're too stupid to read and understand Auster's site, I'll make a brief reply.

    Lawrence Auster felt Duke railed about Jews instead of being concerned about nonwhite immigration. He considered Duke a non-serious figure.
     
  14. sport historian

    sport historian Master

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    Thanks for posting this article. Auster criticized Jewish support for nonwhite immigration often.
     
  15. The Hock

    The Hock Master

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,008
    Location:
    Northern California
    Thanks for posting that Cacharias. The story of the scorpion and the frog comes to mind. It's just what they do apparently.
     
  16. Ambrose

    Ambrose Master

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,476
    Location:
    New York
    I'll warm up your baby bottle while you go lay down in your crib and take a little nap.
     
  17. sport historian

    sport historian Master

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    You're already bedded down with your pacifier.
     
  18. Ambrose

    Ambrose Master

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,476
    Location:
    New York
    After I took it out of your azz!:tongue:
     
  19. Charles Martel

    Charles Martel Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    7,715
    Lawrence Auster was probably as decent and honorable as someone raised as a Jew can be. It's unrealistic to expect him to be anti-Jewish or anti-Israel.

    Not all Jews have the same degree of anti-gentilism. They vary from those who despise white gentiles like
    Noel Ignatiev to those who are generally respectful, fair and positive about us like Auster.

    Let's not forget, Auster lost his job (fired by another Jew) over that article that dealt honestly with race and rape in America.
     
  20. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    24,230
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Disagreements need to be conducted civilly, or there will be a lot of locked threads.

    No more name calling, no calling anyone stupid or dumb, if you can't argue like gentlemen then don't argue at all.
     
  21. Ambrose

    Ambrose Master

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,476
    Location:
    New York

    I agree, but this guy gets on and likes to rattle. No need for it.
     
  22. Charles Martel

    Charles Martel Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    7,715
    I wasn't sure what you meant, so I looked it up:

    The Scorpion and the Frog

    A scorpion and a frog meet on the bank of a stream and the
    scorpion asks the frog to carry him across on its back. The
    frog asks, "How do I know you won't sting me?" The scorpion
    says, "Because if I do, I will die too."

    The frog is satisfied, and they set out, but in midstream,
    the scorpion stings the frog. The frog feels the onset of
    paralysis and starts to sink, knowing they both will drown,
    but has just enough time to gasp "Why?"

    Replies the scorpion: "Its my nature..."
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2016
  23. Don Wassall

    Don Wassall Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    24,230
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I briefly scanned a column the other day by Ross Douthat of The New York Times, who apparently is a "conservative," though I'm not sure of that as I long ago quit reading just about everything written by corporate media columnists. At any rate, this particular column, titled "At Last, Conservative Reform" by the local rag, contained the following paragraph that caught my eye:

    "A new journal, National Affairs, edited by Yuval Levin, began incubating alternatives to a re-ascendant liberalism. The older magazines and think tanks were reinvigorated and played host to increasingly lively policy debates. And a new generation of conservative thinkers coalesced: James Capretta and Avik Roy on health care, Brad Wilcox and Kay Hymowitz on social policy, Ramesh Ponnuru on taxes and monetary policy, James Pethokoukis on financial regulation, Reihan Salam on all of the above, and many others."

    So this is the "new generation of conservative thinkers" being groomed for post-White, post-Christian America. The Republican Party is more disgusting than the Democrat Party.
     
  24. Liverlips

    Liverlips Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,174
    Who needs regular ol' white Christians anyway? What did they ever do for conservatism? :dodgy:
     
  25. Kaptain

    Kaptain Master

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Location:
    Minnesota
    After reading some of his stuff his is definitely a fifth columnist used to keep semi-awake peoples eyes on Blacks, Mestizos, and Islam while ignoring the powerful Jewish forces behind the hoards attacking our white way of life. No wonder he was published in a magazine run by David Horowitz. Who else but a neocon fifth columnist would be?

    Here's just a snippet of his anti anti-semite diatribes:

    Jared Taylor of American Renaissance has written an article purporting to respond to the anti-Semitic manifestations that occurred at the American Renaissance conference in Virginia this past February. He also responds to, or, rather, he loftily dismisses (as a “mistakeâ€) a letter that was sent to him by a group of AR subscribers and conference attendees last month calling on him to cease inviting anti-Semitic speakers to AR conferences, to discourage anti-Semites from attending, and to write an article in AR condemning anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. The letter said that while rational criticism of the role of Jews in leftist and anti-white movements is legitimate, blaming the Jews for all the problems of Western civilization—which is what the more committed anti-Semites do—is not. (In addition to the AR subscribers and attendees who signed the letter, I and several others signed the letter as “non-AR subscribers/attendees who are in support of this letter.†I spoke at the first AR conference in 1994, but have not subscribed to AR or gone to an AR conference in over ten years.)While there are many ambiguities in this situation that I will explore below, the bottom line is that Taylor’s letter is a stunning disappointment. For example, he describes David Duke, who delivered an anti-Semitic diatribe from the floor, as merely “one participant well known for strong views.†Taylor does not admit that it was an error on his part to allow Duke, America’s most outspoken Jew-hater and a well-known publicity hound, to attend the conference, where it was inevitable that he would act out in the manner that he did. Taylor does not mention the most shocking incident at the conference—widespread applause at a speaker’s remark that Israel would not survive its first 100 years, with much of the applause coming from Stormfront followers, many of whom appear to have attended the conference after it became known that Taylor was permitting Duke to attend. These same people also said to some Jewish attendees that they did not belong there. Taylor evidences no sense of responsibility over allowing the situation to develop in which the anti-Semitic behaviors at the conferences occurred.
    Perhaps most disappointing is Taylor’s moral equivalence between Duke’s anti-Semitic diatribe and Michael Hart’s retort: “You f***ing Nazi, you’ve disgraced this meeting.†In Taylor’s book, both were “disgraceful behaviors†that will not be allowed.


    And now for the rather innocent question on the Jewish role that Auster was sooooo offended by:

    [video=youtube;RELmEPUy6lQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RELmEPUy6lQ[/video]
     

Share This Page