I would not do this because I am a bad writer, I am not good in writing down my toughts an I am lazy with typing plus English is not my first language.But the white athletic qualaties compared to other races, and giving arguments that not everything that whites are good in is always just becuase they are discrimination others or that whites are the only ones that like it fascinates me.We all now it is modern to praice all qualitys like dancing, rhytm even IQ of others and say when white sare good at something it is fake and are holding others down. You see this in sports but also in normal jobs with crazy diveristy qoutes always against whites.I already said that I think I find an o.k. way to show in athletics that the overwhelming amount of whites in the top in the strength events is just fro example not only becuase whites like it.I analyse it in my strange way just like in school with math that the teacher said to me I have no idea how you calculated it but the aswer is kindy right I already Analysed the shot put and discuss partially and saw 98 whites 7 blacks and 1 arab and no others in discuss.that is 92% whites in the IAAF toplist.The fastest black was 71.14 meter the least furtest 67.10 meter that is a differnce of 4.04. The furtest whites was 74.08 and 18th white guy 70.06 which is 4.02 if you look at place 19th white you see that 4.04 would be white 18,18. This is indication that there are 18.18/7 is 2.60 times more whites training training hard for the shot put.Or you good say 2.60 more with good facilities.If some blacks have not great faciltys and others do then this would make differnce netto doesn't mather much becuase gap between eacohter becomes bigger in 1 to ... except if you think nearly not all blacks at all have ok facilties to train.I did also some other indicators with SD and normal distribution and to keep it simple it still looks not far away from 2.6.That means not exactly and I don't say becuase I do this just on my own that is totally perfect calculated .But I think it is now 7 blacks to 98 blacks that it would be 18 to 98 if black and whites had same interest.It looks like if all Blacks arabs mongoloid and whites trained all the same that whites would be 76% of the toplist blacks 18% and with using some other measurments national records, and year bests the biggest factor of he 10% others arab, indian east asia), would be most of the 10% arab.I cant type but maybe I will find I way in words how i calcualted all thing but I must Say i find 76% impressive for like 12% of world population.I also did measuemtns calculating from shot put and saw whites are even better also reatively for interst for that.First I saw whites are 98 of 102 top list.So white you also need nation records of other races but it looks whites are 96% of toplist and if others had same inerst there precence of the people of colour( joking i hate that term becuase it used creates non whites vs whites) would be around 250% bigger but still be only 9.9%.with blacks 5.8% and other 4.1 with arab the most of it( with actually one in the bottum real top list).Arabs are a lot like whites but 3.5 height differnce plus being when they are the same height slighly lighter build 2%.But in the top this makes lot differnce, becuase if your average is higher then your top too is too if standard derrivation is the same which is nearly always I saw the reoson I only saw blacks have more variation in leg size realitvely to height.You aslo see that bodyheight is linear to bodybuild( to compensate higher gravity) but you have a lot of build differnce at people from the same height so shorther can still be often be bigger build then taller guy.I expect Javelin and the other strength event to be of the same strength dominat for whites as discuss so less as the extreme shot put dominace.With the shot put I didn't count Reese Hoffa becuase he has a white parent so is likely more then half white althrough DWF's as you call It dont even what it is exacly is will use him as and say one black dude does the shot put and he dominantes. So it looks Altrough my reaserch that whites like it a bit more then blacks , altrough a lot of white toppers can work domitavating, that whites do train for it more( then blacks not all races BTW) or at least more with good accomodations but it can also only explain the small minority part of the white succes and doesn't explain why the around 90% of the world that is non whites is only a few percent in the toplists.Eeven it looked like east asians trained more for it absolutely but not realtively, so less more then they are bigger population altrough the sample was small but still immpressive that you do so great if you are most likely not even the ones training for it the most.Dont forget lot of the whites in the toplist came from realitvely poor countries. I would like a book with the caste football perspective and you mention the records and the reoson you think not every white qualty is just becuase whites are holding others down, but that whites as you can see are great at strength and I have to further calcualte the differnces runners but you dont have to call them less then african runners,They just look the be intemediar between west and east in long distance and in the sprints too.(Except west africans how may others have runned 3 times sub 20, 1 times sub 10 in the 200 and 100 meters and sub 44 seconds 400? Alotrough I didn;t calculated if whites train fro it 1000 more wioth good accomdoations.. middle distance races seamm to be no factro except maybe mongolids who are very absent and in long distance east african some better times but mongoloids around the same and others.) You can mention that this differnces is not racist or very crazy to think all qualitys are exact the same for the populations that sometimes even lived 40.000 years apart.So this is not always A good idea to be for diversity and Quotas becuase the differnces in Qualtitys could be in the working place too with a few % making big differnce at the top, not even mentioned that gender and culture altrough culture could be influcuned by genes are a facor too in your preference what influecned %.There could be a lot of reosons whiteys are sometimes in something a higher % then in country%.Also if you like diversity much you don't have to use this only when whites are overrepresented becuase that is really a form of discriminating. That I would be all in my book if I was a better writer and I would be going further in depth with anaylsing the toplists athletics.So far it looks whites don't suck at any event and look very allround too.Maybe I will anayse more quality with taking in other facors. I think what Alexander Idea of a book is great but I wouldn't just use the % becuase I think no offence that most people now whites win most in winter olympics but also they think whites like it more whcih I think too fron the winter Olympics but that doesn't mean whites have not certain qualitys there, with lower gravity point then blacks but higher reatlively then mongolids and gracvity is great for balance but the weight that whites are heavier is much more advantage down hill then the only very small balance differnces.( only 1 to 2% realtivelt shorter legs) plus heavier build is great for balance.Also in summer there are a lot of not so athletic events.And people now Chna won the most but you can better compare China to all whites of the world together which is still less smaller population.Bu I am going offf topic lol I remeberd some probably asian on inernet writing that asians are so great becuase of the most medals.Bu then can I say dutch national records with 13 million whites dutch in strength events shot discuss is higher then that of the 1.3 billion chinese but so you can go on and on.I would like some fundation if I maked the book for the qaulktiys of whites and mention the qualty of black sprinters as well and others.I like the idea of a book of alexander.But I cant make nice wroted book and I just like to find the real qaultiys behind the high amoun of whites and some events blacks and how much could be environment.Also a lot of people wopuildn't like the book becuase they are used to see bad bad whitey and not like some strong indciations arguments of qualtiy differnces and whites being looked in totally will look athletic, and then a lot of people get some addict brainwash complications that are slighly going away hopefully.