Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Happy Hour' started by Drunkjewishfan, Oct 4, 2011.
Go Mitt Romney! America's best of a bad field.
Let's make a simple animation for everyone to understand:
Romney = :hail::kev: :israel:
I totally agree Freethinker. I can't stand the guy but hes the best of a bad situation as Chris Christie is not going to run as I hoped he would and I do like Ron Paul a lot but he just dosen't have a chance. At least I'm not extolling Obama.
Would you rather be die by gunshot wound to the head or mail bomb going off in your face?
If we're to assume that the only two GOP candidates that have a chance of getting the nomination are Romney and Perry, then there is no "best of a bad situation".
Perry supports the extinction of the white race. We're already not reproducing enough to keep up with the minorities of America. Under Perry's "come on down" immigration plan, we'll be wiped out twice as fast. Remember, once they're here there's no way to ever get rid of them. Four years under Perry would put us in the worst position possible. We'd be the only minority that is specifically not protected by the laws of the nation. It appears that's going to happen eventually, anyway. But Perry would accelerate the process so much that not even one generation would pass before whites become displaced in all areas in American society.
Romney is the same. Obamacare is the democrat version of the Patriot Act. It's a trojan horse that, once fully in place, will enable the government to do anything it wants to under the guise of "public interest". And it's not like the Mexican flood will stop under Romney. With 60 million non-paying illegals in the system to provide healthcare for, taxes will have to be raised well over 50% for all working Americans. Romney is clearly in favor of such a system, since he established one in Massachusettes before the Democrats hijacked congress and rammed their version through. Perhaps if Romney produced a signed statement, promising to use executive order to repeal Obamacare in total on his first day in office or else resign, then I might consider him the lesser of two evils.
I don't see a "good" solution for our current predicament. If the zionist wing of the media (also known as conservative bloggers and pundits) didn't hate Ron Paul so much, he could easily win not only the GOP nomination, but the Presidential election as well. He has enough support among the free-thinking right, the libertarian middle, and the anarchic left to beat Obama through a broad coalition of voters.
Edit: Why won't this editor allow me to indent my paragraphs any more? I used to be able to just put spaces wherever I wanted them. Now it auto-truncates my text. Yet another example of "progress"...
"I do like Ron Paul a lot but he just dosen't have a chance."
Says who? The Jewish media masters?
"Notably, less than a month after Romneyâ€™s June 2 announcement that he would seek the GOP nomination, Goldman Sachsâ€”the infamous investment bank associated with bailing out bankers and robbing the people to do soâ€”already had poured just under $294,000 into the campaign of Romney, a longtime business apparatchik whoâ€™s the son of the late Michigan Gov. George Romney, a pro-war, pro-big business Mormon.
The younger Romneyâ€™s contributorsâ€™ list posted by CRP is a veritable â€œwhoâ€™s whoâ€ of economic infamy: Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and JPMorganChase & Co., among others. Letâ€™s just say the Constitution wonâ€™t be the first order of business in a Romney administration..."
"While the corporate media keep throwing two gubernatorial bookendsâ€”Rick Perry of Texas and Mitt Romney of Massachusettsâ€”in our collective face, as if they are the only Republican presidential candidates to consider worthwhile and electable, rank-and-file military personnel continue to show major support for Rep. Ron Paul during his second shot at the GOP nomination for president..."
I agree with the last 2 posters. I agree there is a Zionist control in the media but for whatever reason which Im sure I'll hear in the near future, Ron Paul dosen't have a chance. I just care whats best for the country and I hate special interest groups. Unfortunatley this site is full of them. There is nothing wrong with being a pro white Christian but you aren't going to win the world anymore. To many people, drones to the media or not are going to go against you. Yes maybe most of them are automotons when the MSM controls their thoughts but so can be said about people who get their news and facts form the likes of Glenn Beck or Alex Jones.
I just don't want to see this great country to go to hell and were not done yet, but we need a conservative over a democrat right now and Romney despite his many absurd views is my best choice. Please, no 4 more years of Obama.
I guess we can at least thank Romney for destroying the even more appalling Rick Perry. Other than that I have no use for Romney at all.
I really could only support Paul in the republican field. And since I don't see him winning I don't see myself voting at all. It's really a shame that one of the best candidates outside of Paul the republicans could muster is Herman Cain. I thought he was a joke like Trump when I first heard about him but now he has a legit shot at the nomination. Cain might not as damaging as a Romney or Perry presidency but I still couldn't picture voting for him, especially because he'd be the status quo on Isreal.
In european countries you can't choose the leader of a politicall side except if you have membership.
But you can choose a lot of political sides when in US if im right you can choose only 2 political sides but with a lot of voting who gonna be the leader of the republicans etc.
The advantage of the US system is that you know what you get because al democrats and republicans will be in a lot of points the same.The advantage in most europeasn systems is that you can easilier find a political side that fits you.Disadvantage some find to be becuase lot of political sides and no winner takes all you get a lot of comprimises.
The more votes for strict immigration the more strict the rules probably will be.In my countie I believe for 5000 euro you can start political side and often the biggest 5 or 6 or so political sides come together and are invited for a tv show and discuss subjects with eachothter .
some say we should say 2 side system too becuase it is more clear, what would you guys prefer?
Yes, please go.
What I'll always remember about Glove is his story of pulling over his car and crying when his church announced they would admit negroes. This is the man to make a stand in the last hour against the encroaching darkness: a weeping, effeminate, zionist negro worshiper. An empty suit who stands for nothing and quite possibly is on the down-low.
Maybe he was crying out of despair.
Mitt Romney is white Obama.
Bronk, just noticed your sig line about Korea. While in general its very true that only white nationalism is considered bad, someone did write a book recently about the North Korean dictator and how evil and racist he was.
Concerning Romney, to his credit he claimed to oppose Mccain style immigration amnesty in the 2008 nomination fight, and was criticized by some neo-cons for never talking about foreign policy, which ties into his business centered feelings, I suppose, but in general he'd be just like Bush IMHO. Concerning Paul, if you like him, as I do, who cares what the establishment media says about him, go ahead and vote for him no matter what in the primaries, and then when the general election rolls around lets see who the candidates are at that point.
If you allegedly “hate” the unabashedly pro-white, “special interest group” temperament of this website, then why do you willfully elect to be a part of the “group?” Why lend your time and energy to a movement that is supposedly “full” of philosophies that you “hate?” Please answer one straightforward question…is being pro-white “what’s best for the country” in your ever-sagacious opinion?
The terms “pro-white” and “Christian” are the utter antitheses of one another. A fully-inoculated white Christian man should care nothing for his race, as he has been firmly instructed to “Turn the Other Cheek” (while non-whites ruin his life), to “Keep the Sabbath Holy” (cheering like a schoolgirl for inferior Negroes playing football), to “Be Not Prideful” (especially in his race), to “Love Thy Neighbor” (Love Thy Negro), etc.
And, by the way, courtesy of our Hebrew “allies,” there isn’t a single white man in modern history who “won the world” by being “pro-white.” Those brave men are, however, molded into instantaneous national pariahs, eternally mocked and degraded by all races for the remainder of their lives, fired from their jobs, forever branded with the proper terminology, and forced to grovel and plead for forgiveness at the fetid-odor-emitting feet of the most xenophobic group in world history (you know who). So I’m not quite sure what you’re even referring to when you say “anymore.”
No, it can’t. There isn’t a single pro-white voice permitted to speak in any form of Mass Media for over a century. Those infinitesimal few who do challenge this cultural Zeitgeist are promptly “dealt with.”
The ultra-archaic term you've employed (“conservative”) formerly described a white man who fights for pro-white causes, represents white citizens, protects white borders, preserves white DNA, cherishes white cultures, promotes the birth of white children, expels non-white citizens from white nations, loves the members of his race, etc. That sort of “conservative” hasn’t been permitted to exist in the Zionist-Devoted, emasculated, anti-white, ever-festering NeoCon charlatans comprising “Corporation-R” since the mid-1800’s. Of course, “Corporation-D” is their Negro-loving business partner.
Here is “Mitt” embracing his ass-kisser corporate roots...
Well I guess that's it then. Western Civilization had a good run, but we lost and there is no going back. The Age of Men has passed and now dawns the Age of the Orc.
In reality, no cause is ever truly lost because no cause is ever truly won. We simply cannot know what twists and turns events may take or predict the hand of Providence in these events. As long as one plans to go on living, defeatism is useless.
Wasn't Chesterton's poem just cut and pasted on here, or am I hallucinating? I was gonna comment on it, but screw it, I'll comment anyway whether it's here or not!
Chesterton's superb poem above (The Ballad of the White Horse)...
When our race was strong and vigorous and our wild and free Norsemen came conquering - from the viewpoint of those who had grown soft.
I posted it but removed it due to its length. It is a very good poem and the part I posted addressed the idea of defeatist thinking by comparing Christian hope with fatalism.
"The men of the East may spell the stars,
And times and triumphs mark,
But the men signed of the cross of Christ
Go gaily in the dark.
"The men of the East may search the scrolls
For sure fates and fame,
But the men that drink the blood of God
Go singing to their shame.
"The wise men know what wicked things
Are written on the sky,
They trim sad lamps, they touch sad strings,
Hearing the heavy purple wings,
Where the forgotten seraph kings
Still plot how God shall die.
"The wise men know all evil things
Under the twisted trees,
Where the perverse in pleasure pine
And men are weary of green wine
And sick of crimson seas.
"But you and all the kind of Christ
Are ignorant and brave,
And you have wars you hardly win
And souls you hardly save.
"I tell you naught for your comfort,
Yea, naught for your desire,
Save that the sky grows darker yet
And the sea rises higher.
"Night shall be thrice night over you,
And heaven an iron cope.
Do you have joy without a cause,
Yea, faith without a hope?"
It’s fascinating that you can’t ever seem to muster an actual refutation to whatever I’ve posted. It’s always just some cutesy little remark that is entirely unrelated to the discussion at hand. Funny, your spinal column is far more rigid in your ruthless PMs. Once, your mask came entirely undone and you displayed your odious “PM Personality” in the open forum (under the “Ebonics” thread)…do you really believe that the aweful things you stated there have been forgotten?
Yeah, that’s it, have a good “smoke”…along your daily ingestion of alcohol-based products, “DrunkBlackFan.”
Can't we just be civil? Have you ever created one post that didin't come out venom filled? I think we agree that there is a huge Zionist control in Hollyweird and the media in this country. I tend to be moderate because I actually have Jewish friends. One is a computer engineer , one is a mechanic and I used to date a Jewish girl who was a cashier while going to school. My neice and nephew are half Jewish and the last time I saw them together they weren't plotting the overthrow of America. They were talking about Cookie Monster.
So you know I don't actually drink. I just wanted to get in a joke by my favorite comedian, Greg Girlado. If you recall I said I was such a drunk that when alcohol does its taxes it lists me as a dependant. That is funny. Go to the Roasts of Flava Flav, David Hasselhoff and Larry the Cable Guy. Giraldo just kills everytime. Where do you think I got my farm animal jokes in our PM's?
I feel as if you may have never laughed in your life. I hope I'm wrong.
I can, but you surely can’t…especially when only a select few in the CF Community are able to read your word-filth. After you’ve hit the “Send PM” button, you then adopt the role of “innocent victim” on the open forum. As before, your “sweetness” and noble calls for “civility” will be short-lived.
Yes, I have, and always will spew “venom” towards those who oppose my race (literally billions of people, many of whom are white). Unfortunately, the reprehensible actions of my race’s countless adversaries deserve much worse retaliation, punishment, and “venom” than I could ever administer. You're treating this covert / overt race war (against whites) like a “big joke” because you don't actually care.
No, I don’t think we do “agree,” but it’s exceedingly difficult to decipher because you’re too busy dodging questions, devising multiple personalities, and penning crude, annoying, perverted, juvenile, and highly insulting “jokes” to me (and others) via PM.
You, a “moderate?” Hmm, I hadn’t noticed. Please, Mr. Comedian, describe your “moderate” views for the “white supremacists” (your words, not mine) who frequent Happy Hour. You won’t do this, of course, as you’re a gifted question-dodger.
Yeah, I’ll bet you do…along with Jewish parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc.
Right, because whenever I’m disparaging Marxist Jews, Israeli Terrorists, Yiddish Wars Without End, and Global Zionists, I’m obviously referring to 5-year old kids. Perhaps the youngsters aided you in composing that trite, silly rebuttal? So did your brother and/or sister conceive these children with a Jew, or did their “half Jewish” DNA come from your side of the family? Prediction…you won’t answer this question, either.
Actually, the name of your “favorite comedian” is spelled “Greg Giraldo.” I heard he died last year. The more you blather, the more everything begins to make perfect sense. Your unfunny jokes were copied from unfunny people. And let me take a wild guess…you’re also an avid “Adam Sandler” fan?
I suppose that’s a symptom associated of your lame jesting, “Funny Man.” Perhaps you’d have more respect for me if I “yukked it up” at humorless Jewry like the rest of the self-abhorring, MassSimpleton, docile slobs in “Goyim-Nation?”
Don’t worry, you are. In fact, you’ve been “wrong” since your first ignoble post, MattH / MattG / TimD / DBF.
Arguing with you seems to be a rather futile assignment, but I’ll continue to do so whenever you write something imprudent (“Go Mitt, Go!”). I always enjoy exposing frauds, but you’re so easy that it isn’t even fun anymore.
I'm sorry for publicly admonishing you. I think you would call the sky green if it suited your agenda. Theres nothing wrong with being pro- white but your views make arch conservatives look like Mister Hoffman of the Chicago 8. Just an opinion. Of course you are never wrong on anything or at least act like it which is why I try to deal with people like you through humor.
Also do you check your blood pressure after you post? You are no good to the pro white community if you are dead in 5 years.
Don’t you mean “privately admonishing?” Perhaps that was merely another of your infamous typos? Otherwise, you’re clearly making a concentrated effort to remain as “sweet as pie.”
And don’t you fret, “white brother,” despite your countless attempts, you’ve never angered me whatsoever. I’ve become quite comfortable in my innumerable dealings (both online and in real life) with anti-white zealots such as you. I’m trying to help you to reach a higher level of white enlightenment, but, of course, it’s to no avail. You’ve been poisoned, and I/we are attempting to share the only antidote.
You once again managed to “dodge” all of my questions with your trademark “change the subject” routine. [Yawns] I’m getting bored with this.
Guys dueling by pistols was made illegal 200 years ago. Maybe he can sort out the Jewish identity problem....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd1Pyu9_rxo&feature=related
You were bored 3 months ago. You obviously have an agenda as weak as it is. If you don't care about me or my opinions do it privately. I'm sorry you don't have the intelligence to see this. You are very intelligent yet you lack serious wisdom. Thats not an attack on you just a very good opinion based on many factual events. I would say deal with it but you won't. People like you can never deal with your emotions. Its great to be smart and racially aware but very sad when you cna't answer why you are such an angry person.