Chelsea plot Asian talent trawl

Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
128
This is from the BBC's website, and shows the constant effort undertaken by the establishment to "enrich" our sporting life. If they want to increase the number of non-Whites, why don't they just shoot the latest batch of young White players in the foot. That's what these race-based initiatives amount to - a complete disregard for individual merit. As for Chelsea, I would suggest they worry about keeping their loyal White fans rather than pandering to other ethnic groups who are not fans.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7914439.stm

Chelsea plot Asian talent trawl

Chelsea are targeting the Asian community as they look to unearth a new crop of potential Premier League stars.

The BBC Asian Network understands the club will announce a special coaching project in the next few weeks.

There are seven UK-born Asians playing in England's top four divisions, with none at the highest level after Michael Chopra left Sunderland for Cardiff.

QPR's Zesh Rehman, the only Asian to have played in all four divisions, says the current figures are "shocking".

"I think it's shocking to be perfectly honest. Seven out of 92 league clubs is alarming," said defender Rehman, who is on loan at Bradford City.

"I think the first report about Asians in football came out about 10 years ago. So in 10 years to only have seven Asian players come through is still not enough.

"You can't tell me that Asian kids don't love football because they do.

"Anything that's going to help encourage them to get into the game or believe they have part in it is great."

The five other Asians plying their trade in the top four divisions are: Aman Verma (Leicester City); Anwar Uddin (Dagenham); Adnan Ahmed (Port Vale); Rikki Baines (Macclesfield Town) and Netan Sansara (Walsall).

Chelsea have two British Asian players at their academy, with Nikki Ahamed, 17, who was born in Colombo, Sri Lanka, and grew up in Wembley, having been at the club since he was 10 years old.

Bobby Barnes, the assistant chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association, believes Chelsea will embrace social and business opportunities with the initiative.

"Chelsea are a business and a very successful football club. I think they have looked at not only the social reason but also looked at the marketing opportunities of this and realised there is a massive football-loving Asian market to be tapped into," he stated.

A five-part BBC Asian Network series on Asian footballers and fans started on Monday 2 March and is on for the rest of the week from Tuesday to Friday as part of The Wrap at 1200 and 1800 GMT each day.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
128
By "Asians," it should be pointed out, the BBC means people from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. That's what "Asian" tends to mean in Britain.

Investing in Asians playing soccer is a little like pumping money into the development of Pygmy basketball. In other words, expect "low" returns. The relatively unathletic game of Cricket is more up their street.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Chelsea could be doing it to appease the Asian population. It can't hurt to bring a few kids in. It's good publicity.
If they had quotas about 93 or 94% of the players would be white Brits,not blacks or Asians. If not stopped, English teams will continue to get the Africans and Brazilians at the expense of white British players not just Asian Brits. I hope Blatter succeeds in his attempt to limit foreign players.

Does the PFA say anything about foreign players taking over the game or do they just represent all players?

I heard the Asian parents in England are complaining that their kids are being discriminated against. They move to a country as a small minority and then complain. Who asked them to move to England?
 

j41181

Master
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
2,344
Europe said:
Chelsea could be doing it to appease the Asian population. It can't hurt to bring a few kids in. It's good publicity.
If they had quotas about 93 or 94% of the players would be white Brits,not blacks or Asians. If not stopped, English teams will continue to get the Africans and Brazilians at the expense of white British players not just Asian Brits. I hope Blatter succeeds in his attempt to limit foreign players.

Does the PFA say anything about foreign players taking over the game or do they just represent all players?

I heard the Asian parents in England are complaining that their kids are being discriminated against. They move to a country as a small minority and then complain. Who asked them to move to England?
They come to a White native country, and want to transform it to their own liking and image. They should respect white native culture, white laws, and white way of life. Why leave their own country in the first place? Who gives them the right to dictate how white people should treat them? White people get discriminated in Asian and African countries, and there is no uproar and news about it.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Britain has gotten so diverse they will NEVER be the same country they once were. Which will fall first UK or US?
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
128
celticdb15 said:
Britain has gotten so diverse they will NEVER be the same country they once were. Which will fall first UK or US?

At least in Britain we have the BNP who are advancing every week. In America, you have a non-White (OK half-white) President. Maybe that'll be the spark that a lot of Whites need to realize who the hell they are.

Anyway, I am - and I always have been - a short term pessimist and a long term optimist.
 

j41181

Master
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
2,344
Karl Baxter said:
celticdb15 said:
Britain has gotten so diverse they will NEVER be the same country they once were. Which will fall first UK or US?

At least in Britain we have the BNP who are advancing every week. In America, you have a non-White (OK half-white) President. Maybe that'll be the spark that a lot of Whites need to realize who the hell they are.

Anyway, I am - and I always have been - a short term pessimist and a long term optimist.
Let's hope it will never happen in countries like Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil. These may be the last bastions of the once great and proud White Race.
 

devans

Mentor
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
729
Location
Outside North America
You need to strike Brasil off your list above. It is a very ethnicaly diverse country.
 

DanBazurto

Newbie
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4
Location
Louisiana
Karl Baxter said:
By "Asians," it should be pointed out, the BBC means people from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. That's what "Asian" tends to mean in Britain.

Investing in Asians playing soccer is a little like pumping money into the development of Pygmy basketball. In other words, expect "low" returns.
smiley36.gif

Yep, point is whites in the U.K. get marginalised for other players, they try to use the "athleticism" excuse to put a bunch of nigerians into teams, the "economic" excuse to justify putting a bunch of koreans/chinese/japanese and a "diversity" excuse to put a whole bunck of dravidians in the squads.
 

StarWars

Mentor
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
1,194
j41181 said:
Karl Baxter said:
celticdb15 said:
Britain has gotten so diverse they will NEVER be the same country they once were. Which will fall first UK or US?

At least in Britain we have the BNP who are advancing every week. In America, you have a non-White (OK half-white) President. Maybe that'll be the spark that a lot of Whites need to realize who the hell they are.

Anyway, I am - and I always have been - a short term pessimist and a long term optimist.
Let's hope it will never happen in countries like Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil. These may be the last bastions of the once great and proud White Race.
What coountries are mostly white and will stay that way? Is it just Canada and Australia? What about states?
smiley24.gif
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
I think Finland is all white. They have to get out of the European Union if they want to control immigration. Even if they don't allow immigration from 3rd world countries, they can't control minorities who are within the EU from moving there. I think the language barrier is very difficult there. The Eastern Euro countries I am sure are almost all white. I was in Italy several years ago and I only saw 3 black people, all on a train. There was one women alone and then on another train there were 2 black guys who looked like they were travelling through.Look at France, the President isn't French, the first lady is Italian and there are very few French on the national team. I now the Pres and 1st lady are white, but they aren't French. Most European countries are still homogenous compared to the US, but it is changing. Although, I think I read 50% of Lyon is Muslim. I assume North African, so I think they are considered white, but they still shouldn't be there.

It's too late for the US. Europe could stop it now, especially places like Italy and Eastern Europe, but it could get out of hand if actions aren't taken. Of course, the Muslims are another problem.

Why do people want to give away their country. Well, it's not the people, it's the politicians. I am sure the average Brit and Frenchman don't want all the Muslims and Africans moving there.

I don't think Canada is all white anymore. Places like Toronto are very diverse.

Chicago is trying to get the Olympics and they are advertising how diverse it is. They treat it as a good thing. They said there are 65 languages spoken in Chicago. They are just saying that they gave away the city as far as I'm concerned.
 

waterbed

Mentor
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
871
Location
Outside North America
Karl Baxter said:
celticdb15 said:
Britain has gotten so diverse they will NEVER be the same country they once were. Which will fall first UK or US?

At least in Britain we have the BNP who are advancing every week. In America, you have a non-White (OK half-white) President. Maybe that'll be the spark that a lot of Whites need to realize who the hell they are.

Anyway, I am - and I always have been - a short term pessimist and a long term optimist.

In the netherlands is now Geert wilders with his PVV the biggest is the polls LOL.In the media he was called racist Islamofoob etcetera.they media don't know what to do now when he is the biggest
smiley4.gif
If he will get elected for president he said he will close the borders for non westerners
smiley32.gif
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
128
Europe said:
Look at this nonsense from the Chelsea Website. Pure discrimination agaist real Brits. Anelka says everbody color should be represented on the pitch. Not in England it shouldn't.Discrimination against whites

The absurd implication given out here is that British Football - a sport that has been heavily colonized and, in a sense, ethnically cleansed of indigenous players - is still institutionally racist. This ridiculous event should be picketted by the BNP, using the tactics of passive resistance.Edited by: Karl Baxter
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
128
DanBazurto said:
Karl Baxter said:
By "Asians," it should be pointed out, the BBC means people from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. That's what "Asian" tends to mean in Britain.

Investing in Asians playing soccer is a little like pumping money into the development of Pygmy basketball. In other words, expect "low" returns.
smiley36.gif

Yep, point is whites in the U.K. get marginalised for other players, they try to use the "athleticism" excuse to put a bunch of nigerians into teams, the "economic" excuse to justify putting a bunch of koreans/chinese/japanese and a "diversity" excuse to put a whole bunck of dravidians in the squads.

Good breakdown of the differing tactics used to help different non-White group have an edge on Whites. I sometimes think this is just a vast, evil conspiracy to turn all of us into racists. At times it looks uncannily like this.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
The pakistani and Indian players just aren't as big as the other races. Of course, they shouldn't be in England in the first place. Each country should have their own players. India should have Indians playing and that way they all could compete at the physical level they are. They shouldn't have to compete against European players or Braziians.But, now the Indian teams would probably go out and get some Brazilians to displace the Indians to improve the "quality of play". The Indians should have a good league full of their own people that they can enjoy. Who cares that they can't beat Brazilians. That's the problem with this internationalization of the game. Of course, many of the Dutch and Portugues players leave to go to England and the people in those countries don't get to watch their own top players. The get the 2nd tier Brazilians. If I see one more Brazilian on a club or national team that is not in Brazil, I am going to puke.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
more non-sense

http://www.soccer365.com/news/european_news/general/20042/carlisle_backs_quota_system

quotas exist in football, it has been proven in the french quota scandal
ofcourse they will protest it only if the aim of the quotas is to increase the number of white players

why are almost every fullback and defensive middlefielders in the world blacks?
because they are the least important positions in modern soccer so the black player who doesn't deserves to be in the team based on his skills but is here to be the black player of the team won't do too much damage

famous and obvious players that played for a big club only because they were blacks in a full back or defensive middlefielder position are/were angloma at valencia, abidal at barcelona, sissokho or matuidi at paris saint germain, lassana diarra at real madrid, and there are many others
real madrid has a longtradition of black defensive middlefielders, there were multiple players named diarra, 2 or 3, christian karembeu, geremi ect
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
more non-sense

http://www.soccer365.com/news/european_news/general/20042/carlisle_backs_quota_system

quotas exist in football, it has been proven in the french quota scandal
ofcourse they will protest it only if the aim of the quotas is to increase the number of white players

why are almost every fullback and defensive middlefielders in the world blacks?
because they are the least important positions in modern soccer so the black player who doesn't deserves to be in the team based on his skills but is here to be the black player of the team won't do too much damage

famous and obvious players that played for a big club only because they were blacks in a full back or defensive middlefielder position are/were angloma at valencia, abidal at barcelona, sissokho or matuidi at paris saint germain, lassana diarra at real madrid, and there are many others
real madrid has a longtradition of black defensive middlefielders, there were multiple players named diarra, 2 or 3, christian karembeu, geremi ect


What about Marcel Desailly? Isn't he the prototypical black defensive midfielder?

The Premiership is super diverse already, except for South Asians and that's because they aren't any good, unless the coaches do discriminate against South Asians like they do against whites because the coaches are obsessed with black players.

MU got their token Asian in that Japanese player just as they get rid of Park.

Welcome to a multiracial society. Asians and blacks should go home and they can be 100% of their teams.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
What about Marcel Desailly? Isn't he the prototypical black defensive midfielder?

The Premiership is super diverse already, except for South Asians and that's because they aren't any good, unless the coaches do discriminate against South Asians like they do against whites because the coaches are obsessed with black players.

MU got their token Asian in that Japanese player just as they get rid of Park.

Welcome to a multiracial society. Asians and blacks should go home and they can be 100% of their teams.

in a way, desailly is the typical black defensive middlefielder, because he was never a defensive middlefielder actually, but when he came to ac milan, fabio capello used him in a defensive middlefielder position
he was always a central defender
that's a token black player

it's so ridiculous that when these players that play in europe go to their national teams, there are almost only fullbacks and defensive middlefielders
cameroon for example: they had to play with mbia, a defensive middlefielder, as a central defender, and all their middlefielders are defensive middlefielders

a lot of these african players who come to europe very young want to play offensive middlefielders or strikers like etoo, that's what they trained for in their country, but the european coaches use them in a defensive middlefielder position

alexandre song is also a typical black defensive middlefielder, but actually he played central defender in france, but no club would have wanted a central defender that bad, while a bad defensive middlefielder won't hurt you too much
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
other typical black defensive middlefielders:

essien, from chelsea
when he played in france in bastia he was almost an offensive midllefielder

makelele from real madrid: when he played in france he was a bad offensive middlefielder, and he started playing in a defensive middlefielder position in spain, in celta vigo

from wikipedia:
In homage to Makélélé, many fans and pundits alike have dubbed the defensive midfield position as the "Makélélé Role."
:icon_wink:

i'll call it the token black player role


another proof that defensive middlefielder is the "token black player position":

if you look at argentina's national team, every player plays for a big club
except the defensive middlefielders: gago didn't play much at real madrid because there was the black lassana diarra, bolatti never got any chance to shine in europe, mascherano played as a central defender in barcelona, and biglia still plays in belgium...

that's because the defensive middlefielder position is for blacks

yet, ofcourse, the best defensive middlefielders in the world are whites, like xavi alonso in europe, and the argentine is listed, also lucas leiva the brazilian
 
Last edited:
Top