Any member who wants to help

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
I saw this today :
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olymp...ndants-run-faster-because-155858303--oly.html

There has been a "Black Athletic Superiority" page on Wikipedia for over a year now, with millions of views and I (now) want more than ever before, to use all my knowledge, articles, statistics etc to construct a "White Athletic Superiority" page as well. I mean if the people with the 10% of medals in all sports of the Summer Olympics and 0,000001% in the Winter ones, can use their "dominance" (call me steroids) in sprinting and basketball for few decades now, for such mass propaganda, we need to do something about it, don't we?

As we all know, my English is not great, not even good enough for me to construct such page and make it look good and credible, so I need help from guys who can write perfectly in English and edit as well. Plus I am not as calm and political correct as many guys in here, so I really can't do this by myself.

So who is willing to help? Whoever want's to stay anonymous, just message me and let's do this!
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
I saw this today :
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olymp...ndants-run-faster-because-155858303--oly.html

There has been a "Black Athletic Superiority" page on Wikipedia for over a year now, with millions of views and I (now) want more than ever before, to use all my knowledge, articles, statistics etc to construct a "White Athletic Superiority" page as well. I mean if the people with the 10% of medals in all sports of the Summer Olympics and 0,000001% in the Winter ones, can use their "dominance" (call me steroids) in sprinting and basketball for few decades now, for such mass propaganda, we need to do something about it, don't we?

As we all know, my English is not great, not even good enough for me to construct such page and make it look good and credible, so I need help from guys who can write perfectly in English and edit as well. Plus I am not as calm and political correct as many guys in here, so I really can't do this by myself.

So who is willing to help? Whoever want's to stay anonymous, just message me and let's do this!

Zeus pm me about this the other day. It does sound like a good idea.
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
i can't help because english is not my language either, but i can answer this:


this is an absolute joke
blacks are the ultimate athletes because they underwent selective breeding for what, 100-200 years?
us europeans have been doing this for thousands of years
europeans knew about abortion, and they used it
it has always been "quality over quantity" in europe
abortion was used in an eugenic way, to get better, or at least to stay the best in the world
i could quote plato or other ancient philosophers about eugenics, but i don't even need
all i need is to say that we used abortion as a way to select the best children during all our history

another thing that shows how europeans had selective breeding:

The historical Greeks considered the practice of adult and child sacrifice barbarous.[SUP][26][/SUP] However, exposure of newborns was widely practiced in ancient Greece. In Greece the decision to expose a child was typically the father's, although in Sparta the decision was made by a group of elders.[SUP][27][/SUP] Exposure was the preferred method of disposal, as that act in itself was not murder; moreover, the exposed child technically had a chance of being rescued by the gods or any passersby.[SUP][28][/SUP] This very situation was a recurring motif in Greek mythology.[SUP][29][/SUP] To notify the neighbors of a birth of a child, a woolen strip was hung over the front door - this indicated a female baby. An olive branch indicated a boy had been born. Families did not always keep their new child. After a woman had a baby, she would show it to her husband. If the husband accepted it, it would live, but if he refused it, it would die. Babies would often be rejected if they were illegitimate, unhealthy or deformed, the wrong sex (female for example), or too great a burden on the family. These babies would not be directly killed, but put in a clay pot or jar and deserted outside the front door or on the roadway. In ancient Greek religion, this practice took the responsibility away from the parents because the child would die of natural causes, for example hunger, asphyxiation or exposure to the elements.

The practice was prevalent in ancient Rome, as well. Philo was the first philosopher to speak out against it.

In some periods of Roman history it was traditional for a newborn to be brought to the pater familias, the family patriarch, who would then decide whether the child was to be kept and raised, or left to die by exposure.[SUP][33][/SUP] The Twelve Tables of Roman law obliged him to put to death a child that was visibly deformed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide#Greece_and_Rome


As for female sexuality, witches were accused, in effect, of giving contraceptive aid and of performing abortions:

http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/witches.html




Quasimodo is described as "hideous" and a "creation of the devil." He was born with a hunchback, and a giant wart that covers his right eye. He is found abandoned in Notre Dame (on the foundlings' bed, where orphans and unwanted children are left to public charity) on Quasimodo Sunday,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasimodo


and what happened to all the slaves that were brought to brazil, or other parts of south america? or haiti?
and why jamaica had to wait until 2008 to dominate sprints since they are suposedly the best genetically?
it's all about hormones, doping
 
Last edited:

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
I tried editing that page before. It was deleted. I added a paragraph about how White athletes won the majority of medals in the Olympics and our domination of nearly every other athletic event. It was deleted. If a page is created with anything like "White Superiority...." it will be deleted. The people that run that site are die hard cultural marxists. The way wikipedia works is that there are people who have higher level of editing power due to their time on the site, or how much they have created, or who they have blown, whatever the ultra liberal geeks that run the site decide is the best way to control information flow. They also consider complaints and dislikes as a way to censor things they don't like.

I thought we went through this before. Zeus wasn't this one of your main complaints way back when you first joined the site????

However....If there is an interest in trying to create a separate page let me know, I can write something up but someone with software editing skills will have to join wikipedia, I can edit but I'm not so good at creating a new page. There has to be someone here who has some experience in editing/creating web pages. Any volunteers??
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
I tried editing that page before. It was deleted. I added a paragraph about how White athletes won the majority of medals in the Olympics and our domination of nearly every other athletic event. It was deleted. If a page is created with anything like "White Superiority...." it will be deleted. The people that run that site are die hard cultural marxists. The way wikipedia works is that there are people who have higher level of editing power due to their time on the site, or how much they have created, or who they have blown, whatever the ultra liberal geeks that run the site decide is the best way to control information flow. They also consider complaints and dislikes as a way to censor things they don't like.

I thought we went through this before. Zeus wasn't this one of your main complaints way back when you first joined the site????

However....If there is an interest in trying to create a separate page let me know, I can write something up but someone with software editing skills will have to join wikipedia, I can edit but I'm not so good at creating a new page. There has to be someone here who has some experience in editing/creating web pages. Any volunteers??

My friend, first off, we are on the same team, we have a common dream and purpose, which is the protection of our kind, so no reason to continue going after each other .........I never had any complaints from the people of this site, the ones who have made anti-white or anti-Greek comments are in my ignore list and I don't care about them or ever answer them again, but that's it, I don't go after my people, even the stupid ones.

Now about the site, yes lets construct a new page and name it "White athletic superiority", we will just stick to facts, we will have to find valuable sources of our claims (piece of cake), we will be 100% political correct (that's where I need you guys lol) and no one will dare to delete it. If we don't try we will never know.

I believe that you did all the things you are saying, cause the same has happened with me in the past, but I was just adding stuff to the page which exists already and the two excuses were that this is a black athletic superiority page and I should create a new page for what I was writing and I needed to do a better usage of the language and find a way to use the sources to my claims as links (something I don't know how to do)

So if anyone in here knows how to construct a page in Wiki and edit it etc message me...........Guys come on, let's do that for our kind, can you realize what pride we will all feel knowing that such page exists in a site that 65 million people around the world use on daily basis? This what they claim at least.

I KNOW FOR A FACT, that they won't delete it if we do a good job, I have created 2 pages in the Greek Wiki and I am the one who has edited 99% of this page right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_in_Greece

YES, WE CAN DO THIS!
 
Last edited:

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
make the page on metapedia and just add a link to the wikipedia page.

Mate, this exactly is my point..........I don't want my page to be considered a Nazi or racist one, I want an official, based on sources and facts white athletic superiority page, just like Negroes have one based on a couple of sports, when we dominate tons of sports and have a huge basis to step foot on and use!
 

'sup bro?

Newbie
Joined
Aug 18, 2011
Messages
55
Location
New York State
Mate, this exactly is my point..........I don't want my page to be considered a Nazi or racist one, I want an official, based on sources and facts white athletic superiority page, just like Negroes have one based on a couple of sports, when we dominate tons of sports and have a huge basis to step foot on and use!

i do wish you good luck.

i''d help myself, but my ip address is pertinently banned from wikipedia from an editing war on the black supremacy page. so i ended up taking my own advice and made my own...
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Black_supremacism


you are wise to organize the troops before going in there. they have a well organized group of blacks and jews that learn the system well in order to maintain the anti-white narrative.

the opposition is numerous, motivated and technically sound.

i hope the members of cf can pitch in here ad help out the z man.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Mate, this exactly is my point..........I don't want my page to be considered a Nazi or racist one, I want an official, based on sources and facts white superiority page, just like Negroes have one based on a couple of sports, when we dominate tons of sports and have a huge basis to step foot on and use!

Zeus, Jaxvid is being perfectly honest. No matter how politically correct we make the page it will get taken down. It is certaiinly worth a try. If the negro can have such a page we need to as well.
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
Zeus, Jaxvid is being perfectly honest. No matter how politically correct we make the page it will get taken down. It is certaiinly worth a try. If the negro can have such a page we need to as well.

Man, this is exactly what I am talking about and now you are talking wisely!

If we do and they take it down, more power to us, since we will know BY A FACT then, that they are totally intimidated and scared of us, the truth and the facts!

If not, then the page will stay there and millions of people will "enjoy" it on daily basis (Can you imagine what huge victory for us such thing would be? Considering how anti-white our world is in 2012)

Like the GREAT Pyrrhus of Epirus said after winning a battle where he lost many of his men : " I don't regret for what I have done in my life, I regret for all I didn't do or I didn't dare to do"

Come on brothers, we come from such ancestors and we can't even TRY to build such a page? Come on, let's do it comrades :)
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
an alternative version of wikipedia sounds like a good idea

Frederic, don't you guys get it that our "hiding" in second and third tier sites only give them more power? Don't you see how they have Jewish intelligence and black athletic superiority in a site of millions readers, while we always run in unknown sites that not even a handful of people have access to?

I mean, you are basically suggesting defeat already without us even trying first!
Let's try brothers and if they ban us or don't allow us to create such page ok, but let's try first. I already registered with the name "Knight De La Barre" (very famous white supremacist name in Yahoo Answers lol)

Come on brothers, I am waiting for volunteers, you can always private message me if you don't want to take part in it openly, I respect that!

Here's the field, it's time for action!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Starting_an_article
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
you could always start the article on metapedia and cut & paste it in wikipedia when the defenders are organized.

Ok I will do that, I will still need help with my English and way I edit things!

I want my article to be perfect and have no flaws or non accurate claims, I want the Jews and Negroes to be 100% unable to slander it, since all the facts I will mention will be based exclusively on statistics and and reality !

I will post it on Metapedia first, but this article will be too good to stay there, it needs to be part of Wikipedia and open the eyes of millions of people. They sabotaged my book, they won't sabotage that too!
 

frederic38

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
4,774
Location
france-grenoble
it's a great idea, take your time and do it perfectly
try to write from a non-racist point of view so that it will be accepted
unfortunately i don't speak english well enough
i'm not sure if i woud be able to do it in french either
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
So there's no one who wants to help huh? Not even the ones who were lecturing me and made fun of my grammar in English........ Ok gentlemen :yo:
 

freddie

Guru
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
145
Location
Toronto
I don't know whether this helps but Don W posted it on the CF Home page about a year ago. Sorry it is so long.

Informal internet polls show a significant majority of the general public believe Black athletes have natural advantages over White athletes. More importantly this viewpoint is reflected within academia as, based upon certain tests and statistics, scientists frequently claim the advantage is “substantial and unmistakableâ€; this despite science’s consistent failure in other areas of research to clearly differentiate between “nature†and “nurtureâ€. To side-step this sensitive subject some avoid the question by equivocating; and assert there is effectively no such thing as Race, or alternatively believe the Black advantage is due to slave breeding (despite there being no details of how this could be effectively achieved within the time period and sustained over a similar length of time), or exists only in sports that require power or running speed. When it is pointed out to those who believe in the Black advantage that Whites dominate a majority of sports in the world, some of which also require power and speed, it is stated with the utmost confidence that Blacks would rule in those sports too if only they bothered to compete or had the opportunity to do so.

Such arguments are, of course, impossible to entirely refute but let’s try by starting with what Science knows for sure. Firstly, "outcomes" - for example the percentage of Black and White players in a professional league or the comparative number of Gold medals won by a specific group in a particular event - are not sufficient in themselves to support a scientific theory. Science would not, for example, assert that men are smarter than women merely because most Nobel Prize winners are male. Nor would science claim that Christians make the best scientists since the pioneers such as Bacon, Newton, Copernicus, Leibniz and Faraday were all Christian. Malcolm Gladwell in his recent book Outliers shows that it takes special and serendipitous circumstances for individuals to excel. Despite this known fact outcomes are used by many as an infallible support for the relative performance of the races. The problem is exacerbated as outcomes are used selectively and are consistently biased towards one specific point-of-view. For example outcomes may, within the social sciences, be used to demonstrate the equivalency or superiority of a historical underclass but are not tolerable as support for a contrary conclusion. Whites are never asserted by science or the media as being “the physically strongest race†despite them winning the vast majority of Olympic weightlifting and strong-men competitions. Economist Dr. Thomas Sowell in his book Race and Culture - a Worldview showed, after a decade of research of groups around the globe, that culture has far more impact than genetics (race) on the social and economic performance of nations and groups; and outcomes are dominated by cultural, geographical, socio-economic, and cognitive psychological variables. This aspect of the matter is not enthusiastically pursued by those in the social sciences.

The second thing we know is that the media can influence public opinion. Advertisers and marketers would not spend billions of dollars annually if science showed that they were wasting their money. As was detailed in Erik Rush’s book Negrophilia the media require visible minorities and their cultures to be endorsed, promoted, and even idolized. The media routinely use laudatory terms for the athleticism of Black athletes and downplay the successes of White athletes. An example: since the heavyweight boxing division has, for the best part of a decade, been dominated by Whites, most media boxing experts pronounce the division now lacks interest, glamour, and is of low quality. Other media techniques are to focus their cameras on the few Black athletes in sports that are dominated by Whites, and explain away the successes of White athletes as being due, not to innate athleticism, but merely a result of hard work and determination. A white sprinter's recent “surprising†victory was put down to the fact he "overcame the wind better". What is not generally known is the institutionalized extent of this phenomenon. In many countries media companies must have strict controls over images and words in relation to race. At this year's Wimbledon telecast John McEnroe gave his judgment regarding the five, all time, fastest runners in tennis - none were Black. Even though it was only an opinion, and the vast percentage of tennis players are White, he was required, ten minutes later, to “reconsider†and add a Black player to his list (Gaël Monfils). To his credit McEnroe made it clear by his tone of voice he resented being “asked†by the network’s Race Equity Police to edit his opinion. I recently attended a national gymnastics competition and during a break a local girls club gave a short demonstration. Despite there being about fifty young students in the display it was evident that only two were clearly Black. I was positioned behind the TV cameras and could see the transmitted images clearly; and saw that the operators focused almost exclusively on the two little Black girls. To be totally fair to the media they also manipulate the public's perception of reality in other issues, including: gender, economic, cultural, social and scientific matters. Some of the techniques they use are: disproportionate and unrepresentative exposure time, location and captioning of photographs (caption different from photograph), and language tricks. Concealed sub-texts are also common: an ostensible scientific documentary on the science of the high jump event featured two athletes: one a well-known white champion and the other an “up and coming†black athlete. Although the champion’s best jump was significantly the higher of the two the hidden objective of the documentary was to illustrate that the Black athlete used natural ability while the White athlete relied upon an ingenious “techniqueâ€. To demonstrate the technique a small pole was used to show how it could, when thrown correctly, rotate and bounce over a high bar which gave the impression that the white guy had as much spring in his legs as a solid piece of wood. The narrator confidently concluded that the Black jumper would soon beat the champion once he had mastered the technique. Four years later he is still well behind.

The next thing we know for sure is that science has not formed a reliable opinion on the subject; and topics that involve Race are only infrequently addressed by academia. When they are the findings are ambiguous at best and absurd at worst. Two examples: a European study regarding soccer referees in the English Premier League was carried out to determine whether the referees were biased against Black players as compared to White players when awarding a free kick for a rules infraction (a foul). The study was portrayed as being highly scientific by taking into account the number of minutes a player was on the pitch, the position played (essentially defence or offence) and other likely variables. However, one potentially influential variable was ignored as it was just assumed by the investigators that both groups actually committed real fouls at an identical rate. The scientists were clearly too afraid to even raise the issue that the foul rate (or the “diving†rate) could perhaps correlate to race. The irony of the study was that the data showed the referees were significantly biased, but against the White players. This could indicate that referees are also afraid to be accused of bias against Blacks so compensate accordingly. None of these issues were a problem for the scientists: they simply omitted these finding from discussion and the major conclusions of the study, and the media failed to report them. A US study of college basketball players was carried out to determine the relative vertical jumping ability of Black and White players. The test apparatus included a contact surface with sensors which determined the force applied by players after jumping from an elevated platform and rebounding off the surface with the results graphed against time. The report concluded that Black players applied a greater force than the Whites to the extent that it could be determined whether a player was Black or White simply by looking at the graph. The problem with the design of the test, not identified by the authors, was that the players were only representative of college basketball athletes; but it is known the background cultures of Black and White athletes differ significantly. What the study was likely measuring was the effectiveness of the background cultures to identify and develop kids with jumping skills for the sport of basketball. Indeed the critically acclaimed book Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports by journalist Jon Entine is replete with pseudo-science of this type. For example in real science the concept of raw “data mining†– searching information for correlations between variables irrespective of any empirical scientific support - is strictly avoided as being non-scientific. An example would be the conclusion that men are smarter than women because data shows they have larger brains when, in fact, there is no prior study determining that brain size correlates to a specific intelligence.

A final thing we know is that genetics can influence sports performance. Further, based upon simple probabilities the less athletically complex requirement of a sport (assuming there is such a thing) the greater will be the potential influence of genetics. It would be absurd to state otherwise. A person from a pigmy group (less than 1.5m in height) will never be a world class high jumper and groups with a higher incidence of endomorphs will not tend to excel in endurance events (as mass uses energy). In other words body geometry (in the examples above: height and mass but could include such things as joint geometry) can influence sporting performance. We can reasonably infer from our knowledge of anthropology that some human population groups have congregated themselves by certain discernable physical features. Scientists would say morphologically. Other population groups, for whatever reason, have not done this to the same extent and have mixed together to a far greater extent, irrespective of morphology. The result of this is that a statistical Bell Curve of any particular characteristic will be necessarily different for these two groups. However this distribution will be meaningless with respect to the potential for any individual in a particular sport because - other than the obvious (such as that endurance athletes need to have a low body weight) - we don’t know, for most sports, what the critical variables are; nor do we understand, in a practical sense, the behaviour of a normal distribution at its upper extreme. One of the most studied and least complex sports, the 100 metre sprint – has only two basic variables: cadence and stride length – yet it has Olympic medalists that vary by nearly 20% in height (30 cm or 12â€) – Enrique Figuerola to Usain Bolt. So while we should expect to see different groups with statistical differences in body geometries there is little reason to believe we can use that observation to theorize on race and sports excellence.

An additional subtle problem exists: any scientist, irrespective of their prior credentials, who forms an opinion contrary to the present academic elite’s viewpoint, will effectively stall their career in that area of study. Dr. J Philippe Rushton, psychology professor at the University of Western Ontario, opined on race and intelligence and race and crime and was pilloried in the press. The same occurred for authors Drs. Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein (The Bell Curve). The pejorative term Scientific Racism is applied to such people, but not to those scientists who find advantages for non-White groups. Such double standards inhibit real science and render race science a literal farce.

As noted above the media affect our perception of reality. A quiz will determine whether you have been influenced by the media.
1. Which sport requires the greater athleticism: A) Basketball or B) Gymnastics?
2. Which sport requires the greater athleticism: A) (American) Football or B) the Decathlon?
3. Which sport requires more fast-twitch muscles: A) 100m dash or B) Olympic weightlifting?
4. Have Black athletes been shown to have faster reactions than Whites: A) Yes, B) No?
5. An African has only won the Olympic 100m gold medal once. Was the sprinter: A) Black or B) White?

The first two questions involve the combination of athletic speed, strength, agility and body awareness. These features are more demanding in gymnastics (six events for men) and the decathlon (ten events) than for the ball sports; so objectively the correct answer to both is B). The answers are important because Whites dominate gymnastics and the decathlon to the same or greater extent than Blacks dominate basketball and football, yet somewhat illogically most people would claim Michael Jordan or Walter Payton to be better athletes than Roman Å ebrle (world record holder and Olympic champion in the Decathlon) or Nikolai Andrianov (seven times Olympic champion in gymnastics).

Question three is somewhat easier to answer now science has found a poor correlation between sprinting performance and muscle type. Weightlifting demands maximum power (not strength) for all aspects of the event whereas power is most important only during the start and drive phases the 100m dash, so again the correct answer is B). Question four: investigation has shown that no race (of people) have faster reactions than any other, based upon sprint reaction times, so the correct answer is B). The answer to question five is B): Reggie Walker, a white South African running for UK. If you think this was a trick question, or some kind of anomaly, I could have asked: Is the world record for the triple jump held by a Black Athlete or a White? Or: Of the ten highest jumpers in the world are more Black or White? Or: has a white African athlete run indoors, at non-altitude, as fast as a black African athlete over 60m? (No = A, Yes = B). All answers would be the same – that is: answer B). This quiz has been designed for the purpose of determining the influence of the media and no other interpretation should be placed on it, but if you answered A) to two or more questions then you have been deluded by the media’s tactics.

In summary: Hard Science has so far been unable to definitively solve the riddle of why some human groups perform certain activities at a higher level than others. Our cultural and political elites however refuse to leave it as an interesting cultural phenomenon as the present belief is compatible with a number of their biased interests which are beyond the scope of this article. Instead they would have us believe a farrago of inconsistent pseudo-scientific theories, which to any honest and critical thinker are totally unacceptable. Most troubling is that those who resist the media’s template are deemed to be a type of modern-day heretic.
If you disagree with the thrust of this article there is a final quiz question for you: on my wall at home I have a framed certificate that show I held a national age-group sprint record. What is my race?
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
I don't know whether this helps but Don W posted it on the CF Home page about a year ago. Sorry it is so long.

Informal internet polls show a significant majority of the general public believe Black athletes have natural advantages over White athletes. More importantly this viewpoint is reflected within academia as, based upon certain tests and statistics, scientists frequently claim the advantage is “substantial and unmistakableâ€; this despite science’s consistent failure in other areas of research to clearly differentiate between “nature†and “nurtureâ€. To side-step this sensitive subject some avoid the question by equivocating; and assert there is effectively no such thing as Race, or alternatively believe the Black advantage is due to slave breeding (despite there being no details of how this could be effectively achieved within the time period and sustained over a similar length of time), or exists only in sports that require power or running speed. When it is pointed out to those who believe in the Black advantage that Whites dominate a majority of sports in the world, some of which also require power and speed, it is stated with the utmost confidence that Blacks would rule in those sports too if only they bothered to compete or had the opportunity to do so.

Such arguments are, of course, impossible to entirely refute but let’s try by starting with what Science knows for sure. Firstly, "outcomes" - for example the percentage of Black and White players in a professional league or the comparative number of Gold medals won by a specific group in a particular event - are not sufficient in themselves to support a scientific theory. Science would not, for example, assert that men are smarter than women merely because most Nobel Prize winners are male. Nor would science claim that Christians make the best scientists since the pioneers such as Bacon, Newton, Copernicus, Leibniz and Faraday were all Christian. Malcolm Gladwell in his recent book Outliers shows that it takes special and serendipitous circumstances for individuals to excel. Despite this known fact outcomes are used by many as an infallible support for the relative performance of the races. The problem is exacerbated as outcomes are used selectively and are consistently biased towards one specific point-of-view. For example outcomes may, within the social sciences, be used to demonstrate the equivalency or superiority of a historical underclass but are not tolerable as support for a contrary conclusion. Whites are never asserted by science or the media as being “the physically strongest race†despite them winning the vast majority of Olympic weightlifting and strong-men competitions. Economist Dr. Thomas Sowell in his book Race and Culture - a Worldview showed, after a decade of research of groups around the globe, that culture has far more impact than genetics (race) on the social and economic performance of nations and groups; and outcomes are dominated by cultural, geographical, socio-economic, and cognitive psychological variables. This aspect of the matter is not enthusiastically pursued by those in the social sciences.

The second thing we know is that the media can influence public opinion. Advertisers and marketers would not spend billions of dollars annually if science showed that they were wasting their money. As was detailed in Erik Rush’s book Negrophilia the media require visible minorities and their cultures to be endorsed, promoted, and even idolized. The media routinely use laudatory terms for the athleticism of Black athletes and downplay the successes of White athletes. An example: since the heavyweight boxing division has, for the best part of a decade, been dominated by Whites, most media boxing experts pronounce the division now lacks interest, glamour, and is of low quality. Other media techniques are to focus their cameras on the few Black athletes in sports that are dominated by Whites, and explain away the successes of White athletes as being due, not to innate athleticism, but merely a result of hard work and determination. A white sprinter's recent “surprising†victory was put down to the fact he "overcame the wind better". What is not generally known is the institutionalized extent of this phenomenon. In many countries media companies must have strict controls over images and words in relation to race. At this year's Wimbledon telecast John McEnroe gave his judgment regarding the five, all time, fastest runners in tennis - none were Black. Even though it was only an opinion, and the vast percentage of tennis players are White, he was required, ten minutes later, to “reconsider†and add a Black player to his list (Gaël Monfils). To his credit McEnroe made it clear by his tone of voice he resented being “asked†by the network’s Race Equity Police to edit his opinion. I recently attended a national gymnastics competition and during a break a local girls club gave a short demonstration. Despite there being about fifty young students in the display it was evident that only two were clearly Black. I was positioned behind the TV cameras and could see the transmitted images clearly; and saw that the operators focused almost exclusively on the two little Black girls. To be totally fair to the media they also manipulate the public's perception of reality in other issues, including: gender, economic, cultural, social and scientific matters. Some of the techniques they use are: disproportionate and unrepresentative exposure time, location and captioning of photographs (caption different from photograph), and language tricks. Concealed sub-texts are also common: an ostensible scientific documentary on the science of the high jump event featured two athletes: one a well-known white champion and the other an “up and coming†black athlete. Although the champion’s best jump was significantly the higher of the two the hidden objective of the documentary was to illustrate that the Black athlete used natural ability while the White athlete relied upon an ingenious “techniqueâ€. To demonstrate the technique a small pole was used to show how it could, when thrown correctly, rotate and bounce over a high bar which gave the impression that the white guy had as much spring in his legs as a solid piece of wood. The narrator confidently concluded that the Black jumper would soon beat the champion once he had mastered the technique. Four years later he is still well behind.

The next thing we know for sure is that science has not formed a reliable opinion on the subject; and topics that involve Race are only infrequently addressed by academia. When they are the findings are ambiguous at best and absurd at worst. Two examples: a European study regarding soccer referees in the English Premier League was carried out to determine whether the referees were biased against Black players as compared to White players when awarding a free kick for a rules infraction (a foul). The study was portrayed as being highly scientific by taking into account the number of minutes a player was on the pitch, the position played (essentially defence or offence) and other likely variables. However, one potentially influential variable was ignored as it was just assumed by the investigators that both groups actually committed real fouls at an identical rate. The scientists were clearly too afraid to even raise the issue that the foul rate (or the “diving†rate) could perhaps correlate to race. The irony of the study was that the data showed the referees were significantly biased, but against the White players. This could indicate that referees are also afraid to be accused of bias against Blacks so compensate accordingly. None of these issues were a problem for the scientists: they simply omitted these finding from discussion and the major conclusions of the study, and the media failed to report them. A US study of college basketball players was carried out to determine the relative vertical jumping ability of Black and White players. The test apparatus included a contact surface with sensors which determined the force applied by players after jumping from an elevated platform and rebounding off the surface with the results graphed against time. The report concluded that Black players applied a greater force than the Whites to the extent that it could be determined whether a player was Black or White simply by looking at the graph. The problem with the design of the test, not identified by the authors, was that the players were only representative of college basketball athletes; but it is known the background cultures of Black and White athletes differ significantly. What the study was likely measuring was the effectiveness of the background cultures to identify and develop kids with jumping skills for the sport of basketball. Indeed the critically acclaimed book Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports by journalist Jon Entine is replete with pseudo-science of this type. For example in real science the concept of raw “data mining†– searching information for correlations between variables irrespective of any empirical scientific support - is strictly avoided as being non-scientific. An example would be the conclusion that men are smarter than women because data shows they have larger brains when, in fact, there is no prior study determining that brain size correlates to a specific intelligence.

A final thing we know is that genetics can influence sports performance. Further, based upon simple probabilities the less athletically complex requirement of a sport (assuming there is such a thing) the greater will be the potential influence of genetics. It would be absurd to state otherwise. A person from a pigmy group (less than 1.5m in height) will never be a world class high jumper and groups with a higher incidence of endomorphs will not tend to excel in endurance events (as mass uses energy). In other words body geometry (in the examples above: height and mass but could include such things as joint geometry) can influence sporting performance. We can reasonably infer from our knowledge of anthropology that some human population groups have congregated themselves by certain discernable physical features. Scientists would say morphologically. Other population groups, for whatever reason, have not done this to the same extent and have mixed together to a far greater extent, irrespective of morphology. The result of this is that a statistical Bell Curve of any particular characteristic will be necessarily different for these two groups. However this distribution will be meaningless with respect to the potential for any individual in a particular sport because - other than the obvious (such as that endurance athletes need to have a low body weight) - we don’t know, for most sports, what the critical variables are; nor do we understand, in a practical sense, the behaviour of a normal distribution at its upper extreme. One of the most studied and least complex sports, the 100 metre sprint – has only two basic variables: cadence and stride length – yet it has Olympic medalists that vary by nearly 20% in height (30 cm or 12â€) – Enrique Figuerola to Usain Bolt. So while we should expect to see different groups with statistical differences in body geometries there is little reason to believe we can use that observation to theorize on race and sports excellence.

An additional subtle problem exists: any scientist, irrespective of their prior credentials, who forms an opinion contrary to the present academic elite’s viewpoint, will effectively stall their career in that area of study. Dr. J Philippe Rushton, psychology professor at the University of Western Ontario, opined on race and intelligence and race and crime and was pilloried in the press. The same occurred for authors Drs. Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein (The Bell Curve). The pejorative term Scientific Racism is applied to such people, but not to those scientists who find advantages for non-White groups. Such double standards inhibit real science and render race science a literal farce.

As noted above the media affect our perception of reality. A quiz will determine whether you have been influenced by the media.
1. Which sport requires the greater athleticism: A) Basketball or B) Gymnastics?
2. Which sport requires the greater athleticism: A) (American) Football or B) the Decathlon?
3. Which sport requires more fast-twitch muscles: A) 100m dash or B) Olympic weightlifting?
4. Have Black athletes been shown to have faster reactions than Whites: A) Yes, B) No?
5. An African has only won the Olympic 100m gold medal once. Was the sprinter: A) Black or B) White?

The first two questions involve the combination of athletic speed, strength, agility and body awareness. These features are more demanding in gymnastics (six events for men) and the decathlon (ten events) than for the ball sports; so objectively the correct answer to both is B). The answers are important because Whites dominate gymnastics and the decathlon to the same or greater extent than Blacks dominate basketball and football, yet somewhat illogically most people would claim Michael Jordan or Walter Payton to be better athletes than Roman Å ebrle (world record holder and Olympic champion in the Decathlon) or Nikolai Andrianov (seven times Olympic champion in gymnastics).

Question three is somewhat easier to answer now science has found a poor correlation between sprinting performance and muscle type. Weightlifting demands maximum power (not strength) for all aspects of the event whereas power is most important only during the start and drive phases the 100m dash, so again the correct answer is B). Question four: investigation has shown that no race (of people) have faster reactions than any other, based upon sprint reaction times, so the correct answer is B). The answer to question five is B): Reggie Walker, a white South African running for UK. If you think this was a trick question, or some kind of anomaly, I could have asked: Is the world record for the triple jump held by a Black Athlete or a White? Or: Of the ten highest jumpers in the world are more Black or White? Or: has a white African athlete run indoors, at non-altitude, as fast as a black African athlete over 60m? (No = A, Yes = B). All answers would be the same – that is: answer B). This quiz has been designed for the purpose of determining the influence of the media and no other interpretation should be placed on it, but if you answered A) to two or more questions then you have been deluded by the media’s tactics.

In summary: Hard Science has so far been unable to definitively solve the riddle of why some human groups perform certain activities at a higher level than others. Our cultural and political elites however refuse to leave it as an interesting cultural phenomenon as the present belief is compatible with a number of their biased interests which are beyond the scope of this article. Instead they would have us believe a farrago of inconsistent pseudo-scientific theories, which to any honest and critical thinker are totally unacceptable. Most troubling is that those who resist the media’s template are deemed to be a type of modern-day heretic.
If you disagree with the thrust of this article there is a final quiz question for you: on my wall at home I have a framed certificate that show I held a national age-group sprint record. What is my race?

Wow that was a magnificent work and full of truths that you won't hear on the media.
Don wrote that himself? Amazing job!


One can write a book on race and sports, as well the domination of the white athlete in the vast majority of sports by just picking articles and various analysis from this site!

Could I include such articles in my personal works? (I will mention the site and the sources of course)
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,319
Location
Pennsylvania
Freddie wrote that article. There is a wealth of information already on the site in the way of articles, particularly those by J. B. Cash. They can be found on the homepage and in the J. B. Cash column link.
 

freddie

Guru
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
145
Location
Toronto
Here is something I put together that may be of use:

Media and Race

There is an interesting comparison between the contemporary sporting achievements of two island nations and the media’s portrayal of race. Over the last decade or so the top performers from these two countries have developed from being no more than average participants to a position of total dominance. At the last Olympic Games each country won over two thirds of the gold medals on offer in their specialist disciplines; and their supremacy is reflected in both the men’s and the women’s events. Cohorts have recently broken countless worlds’ records - sometimes by massive margins. And it is not just the top athletes that are so remarkable but also the depth of the talent. The domination and rapid reversal of achievement levels, for both countries, are totally unprecedented in the field of sport. What is interesting is that both sports involve speed and speed endurance; primarily by use of the muscles of the thighs, calves and gluteus maximus. On the negative side both countries have had at least one athlete caught for using performance enhancing drugs.

By any objective measure there is total correspondence between these two phenomena. But as far as the public and the media are concerned they are totally different; and that difference can only be explained by the ethnicity of each nation. The two countries involved are Jamaica and Britain; and the sports are track and field sprint events and cycling track and road events. So how are these two phenomena depicted by the media? Examples of the tone and adjectives of the news reports - written and audio - taken from current US sources, say it all: the Brits – who are all White - are said to be methodical, have a conservative racing style with little panache, and, apparently, improve with fatherhood. Jamaicans on the other hand are viewed as eye-popping, mind boggling, and are living legends. The British are said to have a hot and cold relationships with the media, have British humor, use modern technology, and are subjected to drug innuendo. Jamaicans are colorful, entertaining, exciting, natural and talented. In summary: the racial stereotypes are palpable and they are, according to the media, reflected in how they win and excel at sports. These stunningly simplistic portrayals appear to be embraced by an uncritical public.

Things get worse when a deeper analysis is attempted by the media. Repeatedly the concept of the racial superiority of the Black race in general and the Jamaican slave history in particular is given for their dominance. But no one ever suggests the British excellence is due to the gene pool being shaped by a shared history of struggles defending the island territory or the wet and windy weather! It is also said that everyone runs and fewer people ride a bike which makes the Jamaican performances even more remarkable. But this is misleading as the sport and activity of cycling is far more popular than sprinting – many people run, very few actually sprint. Despite the fact that the number of Jamaican athletes recently caught for drug violations is well into double figures, as compared to just one British cyclist, the majority of drug stories relate to cycling and not sprinting.

The Jamaican dominance is emphasised by the media but the British supremacy is virtually ignored - despite it actually being greater. Although Jamaicans currently hold both men’s sprint records and Olympic titles, hold four of the top five fastest 100 meter times ever, and last year had twenty runners under 10.3 seconds; in the recently completed Tour de France British riders were first and second overall, won seven stages (out of 20), with the time trial winner being a massive 2.85% ahead of the fastest non-Brit. In terms of the 100 meters that would be a victory of nearly three meters. At the Beijing Olympics Britain won a medal in each of the twelve cycling events with eight being gold. A virtually unknown British rider has even won more stages of the Tour de France than Lance Armstrong.

The only conclusion is that the media is biased and promotes racial stereotypes. So here is a prediction for an extremely interesting upcoming Olympic event that pertains to this topic. In the track sprint cycling a French cyclist, who happens to be Black, is the current World Champion and he will almost certainly be going head to head in the finals with the British champion who qualified by defeating the reigning Olympic champion as the sole representative allowed. There is however one significant issue: the French guy recently failed to show for a number of drug tests and received a slap on the wrists by the cycling authorities. The media will almost certainly fail to mention this. If you are tempted to think that the very fact that a Black athlete can become a champion in cycling but not the reverse, just remember that at last year’s World Track Championships, coincidentally also a Frenchman, and who happens to be White, beat all but one Jamaican in both the 100 metre and 200 metre finals, was the second fastest combined sprinter, and captured a bronze medal. The media failed to highlight these facts and photographs on virtually all of the media’s web sites used edited images that failed to place the Frenchman’s performances in perspective.

Quod erat demonstrandum.
 
Last edited:

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
Here is something I put together that may be of use:

Media and Race

There is an interesting comparison between the contemporary sporting achievements of two island nations and the media’s portrayal of race. Over the last decade or so the top performers from these two countries have developed from being no more than average participants to a position of total dominance. At the last Olympic Games each country won over two thirds of the gold medals on offer in their specialist disciplines; and their supremacy is reflected in both the men’s and the women’s events. Cohorts have recently broken countless worlds’ records - sometimes by massive margins. And it is not just the top athletes that are so remarkable but also the depth of the talent. The domination and rapid reversal of achievement levels, for both countries, are totally unprecedented in the field of sport. What is interesting is that both sports involve speed and speed endurance; primarily by use of the muscles of the thighs, calves and gluteus maximus. On the negative side both countries have had at least one athlete caught for using performance enhancing drugs.

By any objective measure there is total correspondence between these two phenomena. But as far as the public and the media are concerned they are totally different; and that difference can only be explained by the ethnicity of each nation. The two countries involved are Jamaica and Britain; and the sports are track and field sprint events and cycling track and road events. So how are these two phenomena depicted by the media? Examples of the tone and adjectives of the news reports - written and audio - taken from current US sources, say it all: the Brits – who are all White - are said to be methodical, have a conservative racing style with little panache, and, apparently, improve with fatherhood. Jamaicans on the other hand are viewed as eye-popping, mind boggling, and are living legends. The British are said to have a hot and cold relationships with the media, have British humor, use modern technology, and are subjected to drug innuendo. Jamaicans are colorful, entertaining, exciting, natural and talented. In summary: the racial stereotypes are palpable and they are, according to the media, reflected in how they win and excel at sports. These stunningly simplistic portrayals appear to be embraced by an uncritical public.

Things get worse when a deeper analysis is attempted by the media. Repeatedly the concept of the racial superiority of the Black race in general and the Jamaican slave history in particular is given for their dominance. But no one ever suggests the British excellence is due to the gene pool being shaped by a shared history of struggles defending the island territory or the wet and windy weather! It is also said that everyone runs and fewer people ride a bike which makes the Jamaican performances even more remarkable. But this is misleading as the sport and activity of cycling is far more popular than sprinting – many people run, very few actually sprint. Despite the fact that the number of Jamaican athletes recently caught for drug violations is well into double figures, as compared to just one British cyclist, the majority of drug stories relate to cycling and not sprinting.

The Jamaican dominance is emphasised by the media but the British supremacy is virtually ignored - despite it actually being greater. Although Jamaicans currently hold both men’s sprint records and Olympic titles, hold four of the top five fastest 100 meter times ever, and last year had twenty runners under 10.3 seconds; in the recently completed Tour de France British riders were first and second overall, won seven stages (out of 20), with the time trial winner being a massive 2.85% ahead of the fastest non-Brit. In terms of the 100 meters that would be a victory of nearly three meters. At the Beijing Olympics Britain won a medal in each of the twelve cycling events with eight being gold. A virtually unknown British rider has even won more stages of the Tour de France than Lance Armstrong.

The only conclusion is that the media is biased and promotes racial stereotypes. So here is a prediction for an extremely interesting upcoming Olympic event that pertains to this topic. In the track sprint cycling a French cyclist, who happens to be Black, is the current World Champion and he will almost certainly be going head to head in the finals with the British champion who qualified by defeating the reigning Olympic champion as the sole representative allowed. There is however one significant issue: the French guy recently failed to show for a number of drug tests and received a slap on the wrists by the cycling authorities. The media will almost certainly fail to mention this. If you are tempted to think that the very fact that a Black athlete can become a champion in cycling but not the reverse, just remember that at last year’s World Track Championships, coincidentally also a Frenchman, and who happens to be White, beat all but one Jamaican in both the 100 metre and 200 metre finals, was the second fastest combined sprinter, and captured a bronze medal. The media failed to highlight these facts and photographs on virtually all of the media’s web sites used edited images that failed to place the Frenchman’s performances in perspective.

Quod erat demonstrandum.


I will probably not use it all, but the most important points of it. My goal when I will construct this page is to make them feel as LITTLE as they really are according to the numbers and facts. In every site I have debated with Negroes or Jews I have caused them incredible angst and hate, because I was probably the first man with my (unique indeed lol) and offensive style presenting them stats and numbers for which they were not even aware in the first place. These people, regardless race, need a WAKE UP call, not seeing us being in the "weak' position ranting or asking for justice in the media or in the NFL and so on.

That's the basic difference between me and most (American) members in this site in the first place, I focus on the all the things we dominate and trust me, they are so many things and sports to be proud of, I prefer to mention of course the injustice and media propaganda against us, but not focus on it so much, it just gives them more power.

What the vast majority of Americans sports fans (emasculated in mind) can't understand despite what their "chosen" media might tell them, is that basketball or sprinting are just two sports just like hockey and tennis, no difference at all.

Then again, I might sound ****y and arrogant here but is ok I am who I am, I come from people like Alexander the Great, Leonidas, Achilles, Napoleon, Charlemagne, even when I lose I win and that's how I see life, I won't allow to NO ONE make me feel bad for myself, race, nation(s) of origin and so on. So the media can't tell me s h i t about NFL and NBA being the best sports, yea right, wasn't Heavyweight Boxing Crown the most significant from all sports? What happened to it once the Eastern Euros got in the game? The same media discredit it overnight. Same goes for International basketball competitions once Negroes started getting dismantled from white teams like Greece, Spain, Argentina etc and the same will happen even if whites make 99,9% of the NFL one day...........it's not the sport the problem, it's who controls the media and like I said before if it was a German who won 100m race back then instead of Owens and someone named Laquisa Tacquesa Jones won a walking race, they would use the specific sport in their propaganda against the white man. Americans (whites) are in the position they are now simply because they have allowed them, with their totally submissive stance to gain all this power and command what is cool and what is not, what sport is major or athletic and what is not and so on. Bottom line, IF YOU DON'T ALLOW TO SOMEONE TO MAKE YOU FEEL INFERIOR, HE WILL NEVER ACHIEVE SUCH THING, so the problem with USA and UK is way deeper and way too cultural to believe that anything can change over a sport or two. As long as the white American man will continue to act, think and speak "politically correctly" even when he's being attacked, humiliated and so on, things will get worse and worse.

You might spend the rest of your life guys ranting for the few sports we don't dominate in big numbers, but someone (me) has to promote and enlighten the people for ALL the sports we dominate, cause (in one thing we definitely agree) if we don't DO, they WON'T (the media) for sure, fully agreed there.

We have the power, truth, numbers and mind, all they have is lies and propaganda, we will prevail in the end and I WANT TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR OFFERING YOUR HELP, in this attempt of mine, seriously your work and writing won't go wasted, I give you my word on this!

Your article is a piece of work, I disagree in some ways you approach things, but still it's a great article and I will use it (as a whole maybe) in a separate section of the page, for the anti-white sports media and their role on this.

Thanks man!:happy:
 
Last edited:

Tom Iron

Mentor
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
1,597
Location
New Jersey


Residents slam leftwing parties for stance on migrants



migrantsstreet.jpg
dot_clear.gif
In an open letter to the main leftwing opposition party SYRIZA and the Communist Party (KKE) published on Wednesday, residents of central Athens referred to «the destruction of the city» and accused the parties of projecting a «so-called leftwing mask of humanitarianism and solidarity» on the thorny issue of illegal immigrants.
The letter was published following a major police sweep over the weekend that resulted in 6,000 migrants being temporarily detained and more than 1,000 being arrested pending deportation, prompting the severe criticism of both KKE and SYRIZA which called the crackdown a «pogrom.»
"You have to be blind not to see what the city has come to. You have to be deaf not to hear the cries of people who are in danger and are obliged to live like animals, in former urban neighborhoods which have become shanty towns. You have to be stupid not to understand what is really going on,» the letter said.
The residents called on the extreme rightwing Chrysi Avgi (Golden Dawn) to «name Mr. Tsipras and Mrs. Papariga honorary presidents,» referring to SYRIZA leader Alexis Tsipras and KKE chief Aleka Papariga. «It seems that they are contributing to its rise,» the letter said, referring to the growing popularity of the ultra-right group which has been linked to a string of racist attacks on immigrants.
In their letter, the residents accuse the Greek Left of supporting capitalism and globalization by allowing the mass settlement in the capital of «smugglers and their victims.»
Concluding, the residents said that they would not allow further provocative statements by the leftist groups ostensibly supporting immigrants to go unanswered. «Greeks bled for their country so that they could live with dignity and not to dance to the rhythm banged out by every foreign mafia boss who has settled in his neighborhood,» the residents said, referring to the rackets trading drugs, counterfeit goods and sex in the city center.
The reason I put this here is I think it's important to keep our eye on Greece. This Golden Dawn outfit is the real deal. They are getting support and the stinking party hacks who ran Greece into the ground are scared.

Tom Iron...
 
Top