Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Soccer' started by Thrashen, May 12, 2014.
I'd still rather see Italy win even if that monkoid is partially responsible.
True. I'm still cheering for Italy, even with Ballotelli. It was a great setup by a white player, even if the commentators say it was all Ballotelli.
For England "white" Ross Barkley comes on for Welbeck... as I've said, even if he is 1/8 black or whatever, anyone watching will see him as a white guy.
if he's brilliant for scoring that header then giroud must be the god of football
Balotelli scores the winning goal and Sterling was England's best player.:icon_mad: I don't want either of these teams to win the WC.
Epic Fail from Maxi Pereira for Uruguay.
Mostly black Columbia defeats Greece.
Which teams do you want to win?
I prefer Spain, Germany and Italy in that order.
Someone mentioned Welbeck played great. Other than a couple of nice early runs, he didn't do anything.
ESPN commentators just said Ballotelli was the reason Italy won, and Michel Ballack took it a step further, saying his play was the reason Italy could attack. Yeah right... Candreva's easily the Man of the Match. A lot of the guys on Big Soccer can even see through that.
Like I've said, EVERYTHING Italy does WILL be credited to Ballotelli. Listening to Van Nistlerooy, Ballack, and Roberto Martinez spew this BS about him is just confirmation of that. Although they do give credit to Pirlo and Candreva, etc.
I want Spain, Germany, or Russia to win it... Argentina with their great white players like Messi, Higuain, etc. would be great as well. If Italy were to play any other team other than those three, than Italy.
Haven't really followed the WC that closely. If Argentina has a white team then I'll support them. Guess they do from your comment.
yes they are all white except a few paraguayan immigrants (their goal keeper for example)
Of course the ESPN headline is "Super Mario Powers Italy."
Stop rooting for Italy.
They want to use Belloteli the same way they used Jackie Robinson to open baseball for non-Whites. But in this case, its for non-White immigration.
England winning is not the same thing because they have already accepted the poison of multiculturalism and black worship.
It's so ridiculous how he's being worshiped by the media, especially when they tell his story and how he has to fight so much waycism in Italy throughout his life. For example, when asked what impressed him the most today, Alexi Lalas from ESPN just said, "Mario, Mario, Mario." Even when the Italian white players do all the work, and he just finished a great ball in by Candreva, he got that much praise heaped on him. Ian Darke said during the goal "It just had to be him." I'm sick of hearing about this overrated punk. If Italy advance deep, it WILL be all him.
Like I've said, I won't cheer for Italy unless they play a team not in the group I'm about to list, like France or an African team for example.
Teams to root for (8 or more white starters): Russia, Bosnia, Croatia, Spain, Germany, Argentina (I think), Holland, Italy (maybe Portugal, but probably not).
Japan vs. Ivory Coast... 11 Asians vs. 11 blacks, two teams representing their nations. This is what the WC should be with ALL the teams. I guess Western Euro teams need not apply...
I'll root for Italy and for Mario to have a career ending injury.
As suspected BSPN has "super Mario" on the home page, as if he signally won the entire match for Italy. BSPN being BSPN.
Oh and Vavazelus has to rear his ugly head and DWF speak. God spare us.
It was a fairly lousy 2nd day overall, with both Colombia and Ivory Coast winning, and of course "Super Mario" hype reaching disgusting levels. I wonder how Italians feel about him and whether they are proud of having this African represent their country.
As for negro-worshipping fool Alexi "Vuvuzela" Lalas, he's completely undeserving of the white genes he was born with and is an embarrassment in every way. I'm sure everyone over at BSPN shares similar sentiments and rooting for all the non-white teams to do well.
I wonder sometimes whether theres a Jewish producer in the production meetings telling them to make sure to hype up the blacks or if the caste whores just do it on their own because they know the score .
Let alone starting for England,anyone who doesn't know hte jew score won't get Welbeck's presence at ManU.
He scored one goal in the PL,the season before last,FFS!!!
Lallana,is simply put,by far England's most creative player and he misses out because of a no-name *** called Sterling?
Without a doubt!
Last summer,when Rooney just had an year left on his contract ,many 'experts' were of the opinion that he should be sold to Chelsea and the team be built around Welbeck!
Rooney now has an excellent 158 goals in 307 games.
Welbeck scored one league goal in 2013-14,despite 27 appearances.
Please tell me you were kidding!:tape2:
also, isn't it surprising to see wilshere not starting for england?
after yesterday where all the european teams except greece played with black strikers, today france plays against honduras, a bad team with zero white players, the perfect match to give benzema his first goal in an international competition for france
france will probably play with 5 blacks, 5 whites, and 1 arab: no, no racial quotas are involved, it just happens that france has randomly the almost exact racial composition at each game in the last few years :icon_rolleyes:
at least it's better than before the quota scantal, when france had 2 non black starters
switzerland (who only have yougoslav strikers, and a disgusting team, and who aren't this good anyway) will face almost all-black ecuador
then finally argentina will play his first match
Not as much as Lallana's ...Wilshere's been having small niggling problems.Lallana was so good this season,I wonder why there isn't an uproar after his exclusion.
Anyone else noticed how England's formation was 'tweaked',so as to accommodate as many wogs as possible?
You know something's fishy when Roy 'two banks of four' Hodgson starts with four 'attackers' in the same lineup.
Ofcourse,above,Welbeck is counted as an attacker,despite his main 'strengths' being tracking back and marking......actually nobody really knows what he does....he's just there because he is black.
The first and best goal of the bunch:
Great dummy by Pirlo,but what a layoff by Marchisio!
Followed by that cannonball of a shot.
The useless sturridge scoring the only kind of goal his talent can allow:
The third goal:
What a beautiful ball by Candreva!
But some jews be like:"Super Mario did everything!":wacko:
All in all,yesterday was a great day for the lying jews.
The fact that they call him "Super" Mario is laughable. I think he's more of a Goomba. When I first heard about this guy, it was by name and he was known as this great "Italian" player. I searched him on Google, saw what he looked like and just laughed.
Throughout the buildup to the World Cup, all the media outlets were reporting Lallana was the most likely guy to start on the right. Then, all of the sudden, Sterling was "looking great" in training, and he was a "must-start" for the media, all within the last week, putting Lallana undeservedly on the bench.
I think Switzerland will have 8-9 white starters!*
*It's more than likely going to be the most multi-kulti mess I've ever seen; 2-4 of them will be Albanians, the striker will be from the Balkans. I think they'll only be about 5 actual Swiss starters. But, going up against Ecuador, I'd rather see the team wearing the Swiss uniform win.