God help us all!

Gun control? It's the best thing you can do for crooks and gangsters. I want you to have nothing. If I'm a bad guy, I'm always gonna have a gun. Safety locks? You will pull the trigger with a lock on, and I'll pull the trigger. We'll see who wins.

– Sammy "The Bull" Gravano, whose testimony convicted John Gotti




The Constitution shall never be construed … to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. – Samuel Adams




http://www.americanrevival.org/quotes/2a.htm

In a recent letter to the editor I gave the example of a "back fire." Which is a method used for fighting fires. A controlled fire is started in the path of an out of control fire hoping to burn up the fuel that the out of control fire needs to continue burning. That's known as fighting fire with fire. I went on the say that if decent citizens are armed, they just might have a chance of stopping a massacre like happened in Connecticut, but if decent citizens are disarmed, then they have "NO" chance. I hate writing about logic. Basic Logic really, really upsets people. I also mentioned in the letter the the MSM in the northeast has an agenda to not report the good things that are done with firearms like killing criminals and deranged people. Although they edited portions of the letter, they did print it.


Tom Iron...

What if the Oklahoma city Bombing was a government sting gone wrong. Let's assume that two government agencies were conducting stings against right wing groups when they started to entrap each other with their agents and informers and one came up with a plan to set off a small explosive, not enough to harm people unless they were too close or had a heart attack but enough to scare people and advance their agenda. Let's thrown in the possibility that some secret office in that building that a foreign power wanted taken out so when they discover the governments plan they rig the building with charges and when the government sets off their explosives the whole building goes up. Now lets say every one invalid was a government agent or Informer including McVeigh. Say that the agency, that informer McVeigh wasn't working for had him arrested and announced that he did it. After it has been publicly announced that McVeigh is the attacker to say he wasn't would cause lost of face and credibility. But to really find out who set the charges would exposed the government's role and very rich and powerful people would possible face criminal charges and the New World Orders agenda would be set back decades, so best plan would be to use a carrot and stick to get McVeigh to play along say threaten his family and then often him a fake execution and new identity rather they intent to do it or betray him to his death doesn't matter only that he buys it, matters. Just a conspiracy theory but who knows. The truth about Lanza is lost in the "elite's" agenda. It has reach the point that what the mainstream media says can't be trusted without massive verification. Everything the mainstream media says is propaganda.

DHS Insider: Obama To Fully Engage Gun Owners with Armed Feds in 2013...

http://www.infowars.com/insider-obama-to-fully-engage-gun-owners-with-armed-feds-in-2013/

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...pes-to-enact-new-gun-control-measures-in-2013

This video points out the hypocrisy of celebrities. It's on the Drudge Report currently so it's getting a lot of views. (Caution: bad words and lots of Hollywood violence.)

Don Wassall said:

This video points out the hypocrisy of celebrities. It's on the Drudge Report currently so it's getting a lot of views. (Caution: bad words and lots of Hollywood violence.)

[video=youtube;hxRlpRcorEU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxRlpRcorEU[/video]​

Click to expand...

90% of those F'ing celebrity frauds shown have armed security when they step out in public. 2 which I know for a fact. Aston and Paltrow have armed guards dressed in plain clothes when they go to the places to be seen. "friends of mine" are employeed by these rotten 2 faced frauds. So I guess I just pointed out the severe hypocrisy of these M Fers.

Mega stars such as Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt and wife Angelia Jolie have buco plain clothes armed security everywhere they go, here and abroad. I was pleasently surpised they did not take part in that vile PS announcement by our Americas(rainbow coalition posers).

Dianne Feinstein Says Her Goal is to Disarm All Americans....

http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-feinstein-says-prepare-to-turn-in-your-guns/

White House Petition - We Demand Obama Issue Executive Order Making White House, Federal Buildings and Events Gun Free Zones


The executive order will establish the White House, all federal buildings and federal events as gun free zones and all federal security personnel will turn in their guns. We also demand the order apply to private schools such as Sidwell Friends School attended by the president’s daughters. This petition is a response to government and corporate media dismissing a call for armed guards at schools following the Sandy Hook shooting...


https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pe...-buildings-and-events-gun-free-zones/JlLk2nfs

20 dark predictions for 2013, the year of oppression and insanity...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/20-dark-predictions-for-2013-the-year-of-oppression-and-insanity.html

Newspaper That Published Gun-Owner Addresses Gets Its Staff's Info Outed

Newspaper That Published Gun-Owner Addresses Gets Its Staff's Info Outed


Map: Where are the Journal News employees in your neighborhood?

http://www.newrochelletalk.com/content/map-where-are-journal-news-employees-your-neighborhood



And even by a rival newspaper:

http://www.rocklandtimes.com/2012/12/27/6612/





SPREAD THIS AROUND.

werewolf said:

Newspaper That Published Gun-Owner Addresses Gets Its Staff's Info Outed


Map: Where are the Journal News employees in your neighborhood?

http://www.newrochelletalk.com/content/map-where-are-journal-news-employees-your-neighborhood

And even by a rival newspaper:

http://www.rocklandtimes.com/2012/12/27/6612/


SPREAD THIS AROUND.

Click to expand...

LOL! I love it...what comes around, goes around.

White House weighs broad gun-control agenda in wake of Newtown shootings...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...81efe0-5682-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_print.html

DixieDestroyer said:

LOL! I love it...what comes around, goes around.

Click to expand...

Spread it around!

Note that the PUNKS at that newspaper have now hired ARMED (I said ARMED!) guards to protect their fat asses!

And of course the feinsteins and soetoro-obamas and all the rest have armed to the teeth guards and secret service agents protecting their gay asses too + they live in fortresses.

This man is awesome:

[video=youtube_share;IDtX2OiQ00Y]http://youtu.be/IDtX2OiQ00Y[/video]

Check out the ridiculous actors he shows in this one.

Right! I'm sure that's what this father's "daughter" wanted to ask the President!

Unreal

The WH/0b0ng0 administration prepares 19 execute orders against 2nd Amendment rights....

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/biden-guns-executive-actions-86187.html?hp=t1_3

While sifting through a few blogs while taking a break, I came across an anonymous comment in a gun control article that I found to be very articulate and concise in regards to the Second Amendment and its intent. I wish I could take credit for it, but I guess this is the next best thing (to post it).

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The preface of the above is presumptive, not a qualifier.


The Second Amendment was not intended to authorize the Federal government to regulate militias; The Bill of Rights is a recitation of the rights of the people and the states, not the powers of the Federal government.


The term "well regulated" in the Second Amendment meant "well-manned and equipped" in 1791 as was determined in the 1939 lawsuit, United States v. Miller. It has nothing to do with the government regulating a militia. In fact the concept of government regulation as we understand it today did not exist at the time as there were no government agencies (which have become the fourth branch of the federal government).


The Second Amendment in modern grammar is read as; "A well-manned and equipped citizenry is necessary to the security of a free state, therefore the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."


Jefferson said it best:
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
-- Thomas Jefferson


The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to afford the governed a means to forcefully oppose tyranny by the governing. It has nothing to do with hunting or sport shooting. It is the most important Amendment because without it the rest of the Constitution would simply become privileges that can be revoked at any time.


United States v. Miller also determined that the term "arms" refers to "ordinary military weapons". American citizens have the right to keep and bear, which means own and carry, any weapons that a soldier carries into battle. That includes past, present and future weapons.
A militia consisted of armed volunteers (distinguished from professional soldiers) willing to fight with their personal arms and not under government control. Further, the right is not limited to militias, which was defined by the co-author of the Second Amendment, George Mason as “the whole of the people.â€￾ The Militia Act of 1792 required all white males between 18 and 45 to own guns.


Fear the government that fears its' citizens. With guns we are citizens, without them we are subjects. When people fear their government, you have tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

It is highly unrealistic to think there will ever be an insurrection in this country with the systems ( police state ) that are in place. Just logic I guess.