South Africa World Cup 2010

DixieDestroyer · Jul 3, 2010

Question for ya'll soccer fans, which (remaining) WC team is the "Whitest"?...Germany, Netherlands, or 1 of the 2 South American teams? In other words, who's the "least caste-esque" team remaining (to pull for)?

accesscrimea · Jul 3, 2010

Spain and Argentina are the whitest remaining teams (100% white)

Germany is almost all white, as is Uruguay. Paraguay are in the world cup just for a few more hours.

Apart from Ghanas run to the quarters it has been the best world cup for white athlete supporters for a long time.

waterbed · Jul 3, 2010

dixie, except Paraguay that gonna lose tonight all teams are great majority white.Maybe it's better that the netherlands who were very non white ( where im from

in the 90's and are mostly white now to win then germany who went from all white to what they are know,if you know what i mean...
if germany wins they maybe think just like france did in 1998, lets take more non whites for the squat...

mrjohnnynofear · Jul 3, 2010

In that Ghana Uruguay game, it probably wouldn't even matter who won as the Dutch will slaughter either one of those teams the way they are playing.

Jack Lambert · Jul 3, 2010

Yay, another official "anti-discrimation" day.

@Dixie, yeah Argentina and Spain are all white, with Uruguay and Germany not far behind.

Damnit, stupid Loew is starting Boateng yet again over Badstuber.Edited by: Jack Lambert

Europe · Jul 3, 2010

alln2 said:
Europe said:

I am glad Ghana lost,but something seems funny in the rules when a definite goal can be stopped via a handball and the team only gets a penalty. Penalties aren't guaranteed. If you had more officials or instant replay they could award a goal.

Ghana shouldn't have gotten past the group stage because of the bad call against kewell. Plus,they had an easy road in the knockout stages with the US and Uruguay compared to say Germany who had to play England and Argentina.

Click to expand...

Only a pk? They get a pk AND a red-card for the opponent. The rules are more than fair. Imagine if the episode happened in the first half. Uruguay would have played entire second half with one man less. Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â It is not the rules' fault that the ghanaians couldnt convert what was esentially a GIFT from the Ref. That missed pk should NOT have happened. The free-kick in the last min of the game, which led to the handball by Suarez, that free-kick was a GIFT from the ref. The uruguyan player DID NOT foul the ghanaian player, the african took a dive and the ref gifted the free-kick, even though Im sure he saw that it was a dive. Even the negro-loving english commentators on ITV acknowledged that the ref should not have given the free-kick to Ghana. The post-game commentators on ITV said that it was a "disgrace" what Suarez did. What really was a disgrace was the gift free-kick which led to that dangerous situation. Justice prevailed with that missed pk. The ghanaians were pitiful in extra-time. The "superior" negro affletes were very tired, they faked numerous injuries, like they did in the extra-time of the USA game. The better team was clearly Uruguay. They dominated the game apart from min 30-45 first half. They created more chances, unfortunately on a number of occasions, when the uruguyans players could have remained 1on1 vs ghana keeper, the last pass was too strong and the ball went straight to the ghana gk.Ghana would not have even made it out of their group if not for two stupid mistakes by serbian players, One was Lukovic, who received red card after he fouled a ghanaian in a completely non-dangerous situation, and the other was the handball by Kuzmanovic in the 85 min. Dumb serbs, they had a great chance to get to the semifinals, and in the end they almost let africans get to that stage. Thanks Uruguay, thanks for keeping the affletes in their places.Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â

Forget about this game. I am just talking about the rule in general. The point is it didn't happen in the first half. It happened at the end of the game when the defensive team has nothing to lose by touching the ball with their hands. Penalty kicks aren't that easy. Plus,they aren't playing anymore to give the one team an advantage with 11 men. Even if you have ten men, it is still difficult to score against them. Teams will just play everyone behind the ball.It's better to have a guy miss the next game than be knocked out, so with this rule why not touch it. It's kind of like fouling a guy before he has a chance to shoot a 3 to tie in baskeball and only given him 2 free throws, but the soccer rule is even worse.

Jack Lambert · Jul 3, 2010

Germany scores less than three minutes in. Another great goal for Thomas Mueller.

Matra1 · Jul 3, 2010

The Argentines are not 100% white. Their goalie is non-white and Tevez looks part mestizo as do a couple of their subs. But yes, they are mostly white, like Uruguay.

Jack Lambert · Jul 3, 2010

That sucks for Mueller, if the Germans win, he'll be out for the next match.

I also think Germany's team will remain almost all white over the next few years. I looked at their 21 U team, and out of 46 players they had three blacks and one Tunisian. That's still 3 blacks and 1 Tunisian too many, but I think two of the blacks suck and won't contribute anything to the team. With the exception of "German" Boateng, all of the players from the U21 team called up to the National Team are white. Also, nearly all of Germany's white players are home grown.

EDIT: Just looked at around 10 guys from France's 21 U team, and they had over twice as many blacks in those ten guys than Germany has on it's entire team.

Here's "France's" Captain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamadou_SakhoEdited by: Jack Lambert

Jack Lambert · Jul 3, 2010

Klose scores for Germany!

2-0 Germany

Nice unselfish play by Podolski, with a nice pass to Klose for the easy goal.Edited by: Jack Lambert

Jack Lambert · Jul 3, 2010

Friedrich scores off of a nice pass by Schweinsteiger, making it 3-0 Germany. For those who want to watch, Germany is playing with a basically all-white team now. Germany is playing great football right now, it is really fun to watch.

Matra1 · Jul 3, 2010

I don't think the Argies have shown up yet.

The Uruguyan Luis Suarez is not apologising for his on the line handball.

"The Hand of God now belongs to me. Mine is the real Hand Of God," said SuÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¡rez. "I made the best save of the tournament. Sometimes in training I play as a goalkeeper so it was worth it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jul/03/world-cup-2010-hand-god-suarez

Highlander · Jul 3, 2010

Jack Lambert said:
Here's "France's" Captain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamadou_Sakho

I read where he is of Senegalese descent. Oh how the former colonies are now colonizing their former colonizers (i.e. France, England, Holland)

I missed a few minutes of the match, did Mueller get a Yellow Card?

Germany looked invincible today. Superb defense, excellent ball-handling and very unselfish team play (unlike that of France, England, and the Africant's.) I wonder what the common-denominator is?

Europe · Jul 3, 2010

Highlander said:
Jack Lambert said:

Here's "France's" Captain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamadou_Sakho

Click to expand...

I read where he is of Senegalese descent.Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â Oh how the former colonies are now colonizing their former colonizers (i.e. France, England, Holland)I missed a few minutes of the match, did Mueller get a Yellow Card?Germany looked invincible today.Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â Superb defense, excellent ball-handling and very unselfish team play (unlike that of France, England, and the Africant's.)Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â I wonder what the common-denominator is?

The people running the US and Europe are idiots for allowing all this immigration. America is finished to me and Europe is less and less worth going to.

Lalas said that 11 guys on the German team had a choice of what country to play for. Some are the white Poles of course, but it's only going to get worse in the future for European teams.

Europe · Jul 3, 2010

I can't stand Boeteng. Do his legs looked deformed? He runs very funny.

alln2 · Jul 3, 2010

Jack Lambert said:
... This includes honorary white man Ozil...

EDIT: Just looked at around 10 guys from France's 21 U team, and they had over twice as many blacks in those ten guys than Germany has on it's entire team.

Here's "France's" Captain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamadou_Sakho

Well, at least we can be sure that Africa's colony in Europe, France, will not win anything 15 years from now. Maybe Blanc will come to his senses and replace the french africants with real french players. On a second thought he's last team, Bordeaux, is a majority negro team, so probably Blanc too believes the african "athleticism" myth.

About Ozil.
Most of you are from Anglo-Saxon countries, so you dont know much history from these parts of Europe.
Not every Turk alive today has only Asiatic ancestors. There are quite a few Turks descendants of the Janissaries, the majority White fighting force of the Otoman Empire.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janissaries
From Murad I to 1648, the Janissaries were gathered through the devÃƒâ€¦Ã…Â¸irme
system. This was the conscription of non-Turkish children, notably
Balkan Christians, but also Armenian Christians and Albanian and
Bosnian Muslims;
They were subject to strict discipline, but they were paid salaries and
pensions on retirement, and were free to marry; those conscripted
through devÃƒâ€¦Ã…Â¸irme formed a distinctive social class <sup id="cite_ref-4" ="reference">[</span>5]</span></sup> which quickly became the ruling class of the Ottoman Empire, displacing the Turkish aristocracy (not much surprise here, as soon as the Whites had the chance they rose to the top of the Turkish society)

Im sure that Ozil is a descendent from these White Jannisaries, he behaves on the field like a White man. Considering the history of the majority White Jannisaries, considering that he looks White, he behaves White, it could well be that he is indeed White. Maybe not entirely, but at least 70-80%. Something like a castizo White.

guest301 · Jul 3, 2010

Germany looked incredible today and exposed a lousy Argentina defense. If Spain beats Paraguay as expected we will basically have a all-white nation final four. Klose two goals away from being the World Cup's all time leading goal scorer.Edited by: guest301

Jack Lambert · Jul 3, 2010

Unfortunatly, Mueller did get a yellow, and will miss the next match. Boeteng does next to nothing for Germany when he plays. I have no clue why Badstuber isn't starting over Boeteng. At least we don't have to watch Cacau, who's been injured the last two games. Germany also has a Nigerian on their team, who won't even sniff a chance to play.

As I put in one of my above posts, at least Germany's 21 U team's white players I think are almost all German. I just hope Germany doesn't start playing more mercenaries. If they don't, then their team should remain as white as it is right now.

Im sure that Ozil is a descendent from these White Jannisaries, he behaves on the field like a White man. Considering the history of the majority White Jannisaries, considering that he looks White, he behaves White, it could well be that he is indeed White. Maybe not entirely, but at least 70-80%. Something like a castizo White.

That's about what I was thinking with Ozil. To the DWFs who watch, he is without question white. Thanks for posting, Alln.

Also, I edited my post above.Edited by: Jack Lambert

Highlander · Jul 3, 2010

I just heard that the first goal by the Netherlands against Brazil has now been ruled a goal by the Dutch and not an "own Goal" by the Brazil player. This is good news as it nullifies the notion that the Dutch "got lucky" or that Brazil "beat themselves".

The Netherlands simply outplayed Brazil in the second half and the score proves it. That's that.

Highlander · Jul 3, 2010

Europe said:
I can't stand Boeteng. Do his legs looked deformed? He runs very funny.

His legs looks like they are shaved. Maybe he's a crossdresser and that's why he "runs very funny."

Just a guess.

alln2 · Jul 3, 2010

Europe said:
Forget about this game. I am just talking about the rule in general. The point is it didn't happen in the first half. It happened at the end of the game when the defensive team has nothing to lose by touching the ball with their hands. Penalty kicks aren't that easy. Plus,they aren't playing anymore to give the one team an advantage with 11 men. Even if you have ten men, it is still difficult to score against them. Teams will just play everyone behind the ball.It's better to have a guy miss the next game than be knocked out, so with this rule why not touch it. It's kind of like fouling a guy before he has a chance to shoot a 3 to tie in baskeball and only given him 2 free throws, but the soccer rule is even worse.

Penalties are always easy for a man. They separate men from boys. If you are not capable to convert pk's, then dont start the game, or dont take them during the game. Always remember from now on : Pk's are never parried, they are always missed. The guy who shoots has many more chances to score that the gk has to stop the shot. If the pk is not converted, it is entirely the fault of the guy who shoots.
Plus, pk's add drama, add excitement to the game. I enjoy the rules as they are, I think they are fair, I dont want them to be changed.

And in basketball, if you are down 3 in the last seconds, it means that you were not good enough in the previous 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe). The team that fouls has every right to foul, to protect their hard work for 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe). Dont cry that you didnt have the chance to shoot the 3, ask yourself why you didnt play better for the previous 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe).
Edited by: alln2

Europe · Jul 3, 2010

Why do the British announcers say "It was a nice pass, that". It gets on my nerves. Has anybody noticed it?

Europe · Jul 3, 2010

It looks like another offside call that was wrong.

Europe · Jul 3, 2010

alln2 said:
Europe said:

Forget about this game. I am just talking about the rule in general. The point is it didn't happen in the first half. It happened at the end of the game when the defensive team has nothing to lose by touching the ball with their hands. Penalty kicks aren't that easy. Plus,they aren't playing anymore to give the one team an advantage with 11 men. Even if you have ten men, it is still difficult to score against them. Teams will just play everyone behind the ball.It's better to have a guy miss the next game than be knocked out, so with this rule why not touch it. It's kind of like fouling a guy before he has a chance to shoot a 3 to tie in baskeball and only given him 2 free throws, but the soccer rule is even worse.

Click to expand...

Penalties are always easy for a man. They separate men from boys. If you are not capable to convert pk's, then dont start the game, or dont take them during the game.Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â Always remember from now on : Pk's are never parried, they are always missed.Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â The guy who shoots has many more chances to score that the gk has to stop the shot. If the pk is not converted, it is entirely the fault of the guy who shoots. Plus, pk's add drama, add excitement to the game. I enjoy the rules as they are, I think they are fair, I dont want them to be changed. And in basketball, if you are down 3 in the last seconds, it means that you were not good enough in the previous 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe). The team that fouls has every right to foul, to protect their hard work for 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe). Dont cry that you didnt have the chance to shoot the 3, ask yourself why you didnt play better for the previous 47'50" min ( or 39'50" in europe).

Penalties to decide the game after extra time were not introduced until 1982 in the WC and 86 for the finals. The were not used by Fifa or Uefa until 1970 at all. The FA Cup didn't use them until 1991. Sometimes they had to replay a game 2 or 3 times. I think the record is 4. It's a lottery. If the keeper guesses right he stops it.That's it.As someone said ,why not have the US Open decided by a putt putt game. It can be exciting, but doesn't determine who the better team is.

It's more exciting in basketball to see if a team can tie with a last second shot.
It doesn't matter if you're in front with 10 seconds left. It only matters at the end of the game. If each team made a 3 pt shot every time down, someone will be behind with a few seconds left arbitrarily.

Why not have a homerun hitting contest after 9 innings in baseball,or a field goal contest in football?

I just don't like it,but they aren't going to have replays now, so we'll have to live with it.

Highlander · Jul 3, 2010

It'll be interesting to see how Germany does without Mueller against Spain.

I'm predicting a Germany vs. Netherlands final, but about any combination is fine with me.

The semi-finals look to be very interesting matchups.

All-in-all, despite ESPN castespeak and the MSM multi-culti obsession (aimed only at historically White countries and teams), it's been a great and very entertaining World Cup.

South Africa World Cup 2010

Hall of Famer

Guru

Mentor

Guru

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Mentor

Mentor

Mentor

Guru

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer

Mentor

Mentor

Guru

Mentor

Mentor

Mentor

Mentor