"Notre Dame: White Fullbacks Own Us." Nov 10, 2009

Watcher

Newbie
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
11
Article Posted Nov 10, 2009 by Clay Travis
http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2009/11/10/starting-11-counting-to-five-in-alabama/

"As
for Charlie Weis, I think his era was summed up by this stat, white
fullback Vince Murray carried the ball 14 times for 158 yards against
his team. That's an average of over 11 yards a carry.


Think about that.


A fullback, who started the year in a battle for the second
string spot at a position whose primary job is to bang into things.
Who, in two previous seasons had only seen action against titans Duke
and Ball State. Whose online biography has no stats but lauds him for
playing with "great toughness."


He rushed for 158 yards.


All the talent that Weis has brought to Notre Dame and they
can't stop Navy's white fullback, who by the way played a hell of a
game, on the dive play? Putting those stats into context, that average
per carry was almost twice what the next worst team has allowed him --
Rice gave up 6.5 yards a carry.


If I was a student at Notre Dame, I might make my own anti-Weis shirt. "Notre Dame: White Fullbacks Own Us."



That's an excerpt of the only part that mentions race.

A person commented with "Just out of curiosity, what is the significance of the race of Navy's fullback?" to no response.


More on Murray:
October 7, 2009
</font>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/06/AR2009100602770.html

"After Teich left the Air Force game late in the second quarter, the
Midshipmen (3-2) relied heavily on Murray, who came into the game with
career totals of 19 carries and 78 yards. Murray had a hand in 17 of
Navy's final 31 plays, running the ball 16 times and making one catch.
He finished with 67 yards on 22 carries.

[...]
At Ryle High in Kentucky, Murray was a standout on both sides of the
ball, a rarity in Kentucky's AAAA division; as a senior, he rushed for
1,744 yards and 24 touchdowns as a tailback, and he recorded 115
tackles as a linebacker. East Carolina, Eastern Kentucky and Wofford
recruited Murray as a linebacker, but he wanted a chance to run the
ball. Navy and Air Force were the only schools to offer him the chance
to play fullback.


[Another FB mentioned is Jordan Eddington. Is he black? http://www.navysports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/eddington_jordan00.html ?]

"Eddington, like Murray, is a former linebacker -- only Eddington played
that position his first three seasons at Navy. He was an outside
linebacker as a freshman and sophomore and then moved to inside
linebacker, but most of his playing time came on special teams. With
Navy's depth at linebacker, the coaches asked Eddington to switch to
offense during the spring, in part to take advantage of his size (6
feet, 225 pounds) and speed (he has run the 40-yard dash in 4.44
seconds).
"
same article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/06/AR2009100602770.htmlEdited by: Watcher
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
Welcome to the site Watcher. I haven't seen Murray play, but it looks like this writer is mocking him b/c of his race. I suspect Murray is a good "powerback" like a Le'Ron McClain of the Ravens or Brandon McAnderson of Kansas. McAnderson ran the ball well in the Big 12 with his 4.9 speed and Le'Ron McClain averaged almost 4 YPC in the NFL last year- even with 4.88 speed (he shouldn't have been allowed to run the ball in the NFL, but he certainly "overachieved" with his limited ability). I'm guessing Murray is "at least as fast" (and probably as powerful) as those guys- so if his agility is good for a FB, than why can't he be a threat running the ball from the position? This is especially so at the NCAA level!
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
Notre Dame's run defense isn't very good, but this writer injected white race mocking into this discussion- simply to score entertainment points with his readers and please his employers. Mocking white athleticism is the "in" thing to do and provides an easy weak joke/laugh.

Thanks for the highlights Mike!
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
1,016
Yes, sometimes success of whites can be looked at as not a "bad" thing for the opposing team, as in "your so bad a WHITE RB ran all over you," like the announcer said "you know your defense is bad when Danny Woodhead is getting big gains against you." Hey, at least I'd rather have this bogus assertion than to have no white athletes succeeding at all. Obviously there have been some down weeks, but overall this year I think has had the most white playmakers in recent memory. This week was huge, with Gerhart going 223yds/3td against a team that doesn't recruit white RBs (even though they are relatively white friendly), two Navy white RBs combining for over 200 yds against another team that doesn't recruit whites to play RB (again, even though they're a relatively white friendly team), and Jordan Shipley having his monster game. We had a Big Ten matchup with both teams starting a white RB, and we had several games with big white WR performances that were on national TV. If someone were visiting the country from overseas and watched college football all Saturday, at least they would have the impression that's whites compete at many of the big play positions. Unfortunately that wouldn't be the case every week, but I think this season has had more of these weeks than in the past.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Travis sounds like a typical caste-lackey, afflete jock sniffer, whereas Murray sounds like another fine White athlete!
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
Welcome to Caste Football, Watcher. Nice find on your first post.
 

Csonka72

Newbie
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
21
There was a reply posted to the comment ""Just out of curiosity, what is the significance of the race of Navy's fullback?", however, when I checked back to today to see if there any more comments, the remark was deleted.</span><div>
</span></div><div>Fortunately I had left a tab open with the old, unrefreshed page open with that comment. Here it is, FWIW:</span></div><div>
</span></div><div>"Well since the stereotype is that whites are slower than blacks, and fullbacks are far less likely to run the ball versus a team's starting tailback/halfback, I guess Clay Travis is implying that even the worst type of running back, the "white fullback", can gash the Irish defense.</span></div><div>
</span></div><div>Or to put it another way, Clay is a racist and is probably somehow unaware of the existence of Toby Gerhart, a white running back who has no problem gashing any defense."</span></div><div>
</span></div><div>
</span></div><div>
</span></div>
 
Top