Movie Reviews

Deus Vult

Mentor
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
648
Location
Louisiana
... Anyone else hold the opinion that the guy who portrays Erlendur looks like a testicle nuzzling poofter? … o_O

Yes. No doubt. If you were a Saxon or Briton and a Vikingr boat landed and off jumped Erlendur, charging at you... You would burst out in laughter, drop your sword, reach for a wet tampon, and beat him to death with it!
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
This season of “Vikings” continues its dreadful run of trite, unexciting, and poorly-written episodes. As Rebajlo mentioned, the testicle-demolishing character “Lagertha the Shieldmaiden,” has become the most absurdly-exaggerated historical figure in the entire history of the entertainment industry, which is no easy feat. Ever painted with a brooding grimace upon her face, this puny lass continues to obliterate any man (not just men, but hard men who are professional warriors/soldiers/raiders) without ever sustaining the slightest mechanical injury. Even in the early episodes of the show (when she was the mother of young children), she raided alongside the fittest of Norse warriors. Such a comically-untrue premise...

lagertha-3.jpeg


She’s sexually promiscuous and has slept with numerous men (Ragnar, Earl Sigvard, King Ecbert, Earl Kalf) on the show, which is hardly the modus operandi of a powerful, independent “feminist,” now is it?


229843.original.jpg


maxresdefault.jpg


The mean little waif has also committed multiple public murders (Knut, Einar and Earl Kalf) of high-ranking men without repercussion. The murder of Kalf might be one of the most pathetic scenes in TV history…


After the murder, I suppose the Viking men of “Hedeby” were trembling as that ultra-scary gaggle of pencil-necked teenage girls assembled around their ring leader? A joke, indeed...
 
Last edited:

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
Great picture Rebajlo.

Don't normally look for things like this but check out the shields for Lagartha's Vagina Squad. Remind of anything? And how comically large her sword is. Looks like it's almost dragging the ground. No envy there!

And while everyone else is looking at the enemy, three of her four babes-in-arms are looking down, with two doing that how do my boobs look thing I see women do.

I think they're embarrassed, maybe even up to half as much as the male actors should be.

Most of them were probably theatre arts majors, so maybe not.

Oh well. As someone else said, the whole thing has gone stale anyway.

Hock -

Ha! Ha! o_O The shield borne by the moll-in-chief looks like it is made of foam.

The still actually features five female “babes in arms”.The fifth is partially visible behind the “hulking” figure of load-swallowing Nancy boy Erlendur…
 

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
She’s sexually promiscuous and has slept with numerous men (Ragnar, Earl Sigvard, King Ecbert, Earl Kalf) on the show, which is hardly the modus operandi of a powerful, independent “feminist,” now is it?

Thrashen -

Ah, but this is what “modern”, “progressive” feminism is all about. The feminist slags and their media enablers have pushed the envelope far beyond the scope of their movement’s historical “goals”. In fact, they’ve changed the very definition of “feminism”.

These days, the hard-core “feminists” endeavour to blur - and eventually “eliminate” - the behavioural differences between the genders by gradually acclimatising society to their full-blown “empowerment” fantasies, which generally portray women engaging in casual sex and cruel, deliberate violence. “Modern” feminists aim to mimic the behaviour of males (or, more accurately, a hyperbolically distorted image of their perception of male behaviour…) because they consciously or subconsciously wish they were men, with all of the supposed inherent freedom that entails. Such termagants perennially decry “male privilege” yet ultimately desire to sup at its mythical table, all the while emphasising their “equality” by figuratively belching and tossing half-gnawed bones over their shoulders. This lunacy constitutes a “post-modern” evolution of the classic theory of “penis envy” but it’s now hopped up on the "creative" steroids peddled by that unnatural, almost surreally absurd “popular culture” which is the irredeemably rotten end product of several decades of increasingly shameless moral degeneration.

The “genderless” attitudes of the current feminist vanguard are remarkably adolescent. Teenagers habitually extol and enthusiastically adopt the most negative aspects of the “adult” world they so desperately wish to be part of. For instance, high school kids have always made a big show of drinking, smoking, using drugs, watching porn, and engaging in casual sex. All of these activities are somehow perceived to bestow some sort of “grown up” cachet.

Feminists exhibit the same childish lack of maturity in their farcical attempts to “achieve equality” through relentless promotion of women voluntarily participating in untrammelled sexual licentiousness and brutal violence…as if these are the most essential and defining elements of male behaviour which warrant strict emulation.
 

Heretic

Master
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
3,261
Thrashen -

Ah, but this is what “modern”, “progressive” feminism is all about. The feminist slags and their media enablers have pushed the envelope far beyond the scope of their movement’s historical “goals”. In fact, they’ve changed the very definition of “feminism”.

These days, the hard-core “feminists” endeavour to blur - and eventually “eliminate” - the behavioural differences between the genders by gradually acclimatising society to their full-blown “empowerment” fantasies, which generally portray women engaging in casual sex and cruel, deliberate violence. “Modern” feminists aim to mimic the behaviour of males (or, more accurately, a hyperbolically distorted image of their perception of male behaviour…) because they consciously or subconsciously wish they were men, with all of the supposed inherent freedom that entails. Such termagants perennially decry “male privilege” yet ultimately desire to sup at its mythical table, all the while emphasising their “equality” by figuratively belching and tossing half-gnawed bones over their shoulders. This lunacy constitutes a “post-modern” evolution of the classic theory of “penis envy” but it’s now hopped up on the "creative" steroids peddled by that unnatural, almost surreally absurd “popular culture” which is the irredeemably rotten end product of several decades of increasingly shameless moral degeneration.

The “genderless” attitudes of the current feminist vanguard are remarkably adolescent. Teenagers habitually extol and enthusiastically adopt the most negative aspects of the “adult” world they so desperately wish to be part of. For instance, high school kids have always made a big show of drinking, smoking, using drugs, watching porn, and engaging in casual sex. All of these activities are somehow perceived to bestow some sort of “grown up” cachet.

Feminists exhibit the same childish lack of maturity in their farcical attempts to “achieve equality” through relentless promotion of women voluntarily participating in untrammelled sexual licentiousness and brutal violence…as if these are the most essential and defining elements of male behaviour which warrant strict emulation.
Yep...

 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Good one: Eddie the Eagle !
 

Claimjumper

Mentor
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
1,072
Location
Colorado
A few movies that I've seen over the last few years that I enjoyed:

1. Pawn Sacrifice: Movie that goes through the life of Bobby Fischer from growing up in NY to his games with Spassky. Obviously they play in the jewish and other cold war propaganda throughout, but overall it was a refreshing watch to have a movie with a representative cast, no mindless filler like out of place sex scenes, etc
2. The Finest Hours: Basically a redux of the Perfect Storm, but the setting is 1950's off the coast of MA again and this time a Coast Guard rescue. No noble negroes out of place acting as generals, which was a surpise considering it was a Disney movie
3. Hell or high water: just came out. your basic cobs and robbers film. again a great cast and the one minority (Native America) gets popped with racial jokes throughout
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
A few movies that I've seen over the last few years that I enjoyed:

1. Pawn Sacrifice: Movie that goes through the life of Bobby Fischer from growing up in NY to his games with Spassky. Obviously they play in the jewish and other cold war propaganda throughout, but overall it was a refreshing watch to have a movie with a representative cast, no mindless filler like out of place sex scenes, etc
2. The Finest Hours: Basically a redux of the Perfect Storm, but the setting is 1950's off the coast of MA again and this time a Coast Guard rescue. No noble negroes out of place acting as generals, which was a surpise considering it was a Disney movie
3. Hell or high water: just came out. your basic cobs and robbers film. again a great cast and the one minority (Native America) gets popped with racial jokes throughout

Just saw The a Finest Hours the other day. I concur with you, I was surprised Disney can still pump out a movie representative of the 1950s! Hell or High Water looks great. For some reason my local movie theatres aren't airing it yet.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
561
I have seen moneyball. No comment as I have never liked Jonah Hill as an actor. Not because he is Jewish but he is just a fat shlub. Superbad was not funny. The only thing I liked with Hill in it was 21 Jump Street. He had some really good chemistry with Channing Tatum. I will say this about Hill's lack of appeal. He is like the population of India. He is loud, sweaty and doubles in size every year. lol
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
Guys, don't waste a cent on Suicide Squad.. movie not delivering.

I haven't seen many of the recent comic book movies.. but I did rent Batman vs Superman last week. I had low expectations, but thought it was pretty good. I remember there was some rancor within the nerd community when Ben Affleck was cast as Batman, but I thought he was a good Bruce Wayne. Also thought the Superman casting was good, and Amy Adams looked good as Lois Lane. My opinion, the final Doomsday fight scene ran long, (movie was pushing 2.5 hours).. but the story covered a lot of ground, even outside the story of Batman's resentment toward Superman. Pretty good watch..
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Hell or high water was excellent! Does an excellent job of showing the desolation and poverty in former Texas oil field boomtowns.

Personally wasn't really impressed with Batman vs Superman but decent flick. Cloverfield lane with John Goodman is another decent movie with some suspense and a pretty much all white cast.
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
6,974
Location
Suffolk County, NY
Hell or high water was excellent! Does an excellent job of showing the desolation and poverty in former Texas oil field boomtowns.

Personally wasn't really impressed with Batman vs Superman but decent flick. Cloverfield lane with John Goodman is another decent movie with some suspense and a pretty much all white cast.
I really want to see Hell or High Water. Looked good and we've got a few rave reviews here.

*SPOILER ALERT - going to talk about 10 Cloverfield Lane, which I do recommend, but don't read further if you intend to watch it*

It's ironic you mention this film as I just watched it today. You're right that it does have an all-White cast, if you include John Goodman who is jewish. For the purpose of the movie, his character is clearly a White, Louisiana Southerner, who's both a "prepper" and "conspiracy theorist". Now this is where I'm a bit torn. Usually (((Hollywood))) likes to portray preppers and/or survivalists as crazy loons believing in outlandish fables. Well in this case he's entirely right, keeping himself and the other cast members safe from catastrophic destruction. But then this "good guy" turns out to be a kidnapper and murderer and ultimately the villain. There's also a bit too much "girl power" at the end but it least it wasn't some magical dindu coming in to save the day and getting the White woman....
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
It's ironic you mention this film as I just watched it today. You're right that it does have an all-White cast, if you include John Goodman who is jewish. For the purpose of the movie, his character is clearly a White, Louisiana Southerner, who's both a "prepper" and "conspiracy theorist". Now this is where I'm a bit torn. Usually (((Hollywood))) likes to portray preppers and/or survivalists as crazy loons believing in outlandish fables. Well in this case he's entirely right, keeping himself and the other cast members safe from catastrophic destruction. But then this "good guy" turns out to be a kidnapper and murderer and ultimately the villain. There's also a bit too much "girl power" at the end but it least it wasn't some magical dindu coming in to save the day and getting the White woman....

John Goodman isn't Jewish. You might be thinking of Roseanne Barr's real-life ex-husband, Tom Arnold, who was born a white Methodist, but converted to Judiasm upon marrying Barr...

image.jpg

Roseanne was in "hot water" with the "free press" this summer for making pro-Trump comments.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,319
Location
Pennsylvania
Goodman memorably played a converted Jew in The Big Lebowski, a twisted but funny movie.
 

Heretic

Master
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
3,261
Saw 'Hell or High Water' this weekend.......highly recommend......Jeff Bridges is great in the movie.
Saw it the other day. Highly recommend as well. Stylistically and thematically, the kind of film that seemingly came out every week in the theaters during the 70's, and sometimes on the "Late Late Movie" during that era (without the R-rated bits).

It touches on topics, especially the economic devastation, but also White dispossession, that Trump either mentions or alludes to. Well-acted by all, especially Bridges, Ben Foster, and Gil Birmingham (who played the "half breed" (Mexican and Indian)) as Bridges referred to him one time in the film.

A dystopian film about modern-day Amerika.

Love the quote from the "half breed" at the beginning of this trailer:

 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
703
Spotlight.
Watched this movie recently on instant Netflix. It covers the Boston newspaper that exposed the decades-long child abuse within Boston's Catholic priesthood. I thought the acting and casting were good, Michael Keaton played a good Boston newspaper man.. and also thought the movie did well making mundane reporting dramatic & entertaining, (and depicting the culture of Catholic Boston).
'Spotlight' was the group of journalists who worked on the series of print stories. I give it up a thumbs-up.
 

Flint

Mentor
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
1,468
Saw it the other day. Highly recommend as well. Stylistically and thematically, the kind of film that seemingly came out every week in the theaters during the 70's, and sometimes on the "Late Late Movie" during that era (without the R-rated bits).

It touches on topics, especially the economic devastation, but also White dispossession, that Trump either mentions or alludes to. Well-acted by all, especially Bridges, Ben Foster, and Gil Birmingham (who played the "half breed" (Mexican and Indian)) as Bridges referred to him one time in the film.

A dystopian film about modern-day Amerika.

Love the quote from the "half breed" at the beginning of this trailer:


Yeah I saw it this weekend. Great movie! Thanks for suggesting it northwinds and claimjumper. I would actually like to see it again, something I almost never do with movies. One thing I know, if CF members like a movie, it is worth seeing.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
New Magnificent Seven is full of diversity. Denzel plays a black cowboy. Also a Mexican, native, and an Asian Assassin making appearances. lol so 4 out of the 7 are minorities or should I say the soon to be majority In formerly white America.
 

Riggins44

Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3,019
Location
Virginia
New Magnificent Seven is full of diversity. Denzel plays a black cowboy. Also a Mexican, native, and an Asian Assassin making appearances. lol so 4 out of the 7 are minorities or should I say the soon to be majority In formerly white America.

Gee, what color do you think all the villains in the movie will be? I bet they won't be as diverse as the heroes. In fact, I'll bet they will all be from one certain racial group.
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Gee, what color do you think all the villains in the movie will be? I bet they won't be as diverse as the heroes. In fact, I'll bet they will all be from one certain racial group.

No Doubt the Jew run studios will show their true colors and the villains will be white men. They might even go a step further and they'll all be blonde haired n blue eyed. Pathetic.

Sadly the dumbed down masses will eat this cultural Marxists BS up! Some racially aware whites might notice but most have been beaten down and conditioned to believe diversity is a strength! Unfortunately being called a racist these days is more scary to white people than Damn near anything else! So weak.
 
Last edited:

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
Watching "The Duel" with Woody Harrellson and Liam Hemsworth. Ten minutes in and it's a good one so far! It's a Western set in 1860s Texas!

Eh hour in and idk about this one. Long story short evil white men capture and hunt mexican prisoners. Knew it was too good r be true, real agenda shines through.
 
Last edited:
Top