Are we, pro whites, responsible for the "bad" too?

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
I had a very long conversation with some fellow patriotic pro white brothers today and I also notice many guys think like that in this site too.

We pretty much dominate every RAW athletic event there is, such as triathlon, gymnastics, decathlon, cycling, rowing etc (too many to name) but our guys will cry and complain how we don't dominate 100 or 200m, which in reality are only two of the very few raw athletic events we don't dominate. We have dominated golf or female tennis for ever, but some white guys will complain for the one-two good players black "race" has produced, when there are x500 more white greats.

Jews and blacks invented one day the term "sub 10 seconds barrier" for the 100m.............Has any of you ever made a research to see how all this 10 sec barrier started? Mainly from pro white men (yes, it was not self loathing liberals) who one day woke up and realized that there's has not been a single white man who has gone sub 10 sec and kept crying and crying and crying about it, to the point Jews and blacks took advantage of it and gave birth to the whole term.

There are tons of "barriers", for example over 6m in pole vault, over 18m in triple jump, over 100m in javelin, many of "barriers" in cycling, swimming, rowing, gymnastics, ice skating etc that our white people own exclusively..........but no one bothers to invent such terms, why my question is? That's our stupidity and we take these sports for granted.........let a Negro break a record in pole vault and I bet you all that the next day there will be a new "barrier" in that sport too!

When you dominate pretty much everything, but you will complain for the few things you don't dominate (for whatever reason) YOU give them the right to take advantage of it and then the story is endless.

If Jesse Owens ( btw, blacks did not even win 2-3% of the medals in those Olympics, but thanks to Hitler's reaction over a SINGLE athletic event, Jews used it against us) won the event of rowing or gymnastics or even table tennis instead of 100m, the media and Jewish propaganda would focus on whatever the black man "took" from Hitler and the White man, it just happened being 100m.


Do you guys realize that if it was gymnastics or swimming or even walking races that blacks dominated, instead of these few running events they do for a few decades now, it would be those sports that the media would focus on and nobody would give a damn for the "fastest" man on earth?

Wasn't golf a boring, nonathletic, no good blah blah sport for 150 years, but the day a Negro started being a dominant figure in it, he became the richest, the "baddest", the athlete of the athletes and so on? If we did not focus so much on what our people don't dominate (very few indeed) but focused on all WE DOMINATE, then they would not have so much power against us. Just my opinion.

A great example to close this, is Heavyweight Boxing, when it was dominated from Negroes it used to be the "Godliest" title on earth, for the last 15 years it means nothing........really? Isn't WWE a staged "fake" sport etc? I remember when the Rock was the man, WWE became the baddest sport in America.

Guys, maybe we should all approach things a little differently? When the day comes and 100m will be dominated by a white man again, they will find a way to discredit the whole sport like they do with HW boxing now.
 
Last edited:

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
Yes, I don't see why the big deal about the 100 meter. I was thinking more emphasis should be put on the 400 meter as it still isn't that far of a distance except you can't go all out for the whole thing. From reading around , people say you can run 300m all out before gassing out so why not make that an event? or more emphasis on 200? Christophe was able to run 19.8 which is 9.9 each 100 meters.
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
Yes, I don't see why the big deal about the 100 meter.

Me neither man, we dominate so many raw athletic events and we keep going mad over a damn thing, I mean Negroes must be good at something too man, they are completely useless in pretty much everything, so what's the big deal? Some black men on steroids, with very tight colans up their butts running fast for 10 seconds................Ok and?

We win a good 80% of the medals (combined Summer and Winter Olympics) in all sports and some guys worry about the very few things Negroes do good...........I mean that's like the lion being upset with rabbits, just because the rabbit runs faster.

If speed was the only element of athleticism or manhood, then rabbit would be the king of the jungle instead of the Lion........ am I right? LOL
 
Last edited:

JReb1

Mentor
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
838
The NFL and NBA are the 2 most hyped (highly paid) sports in the USA and both are black dominated with MUCH help from the Caste system which they then use a proof of black superiority. We want Whites to have an equal opportunity to compete and earn in theses sports which they would dominate if they're ever given an equal opportunity to compete again.

Nobody cares about sprinting in America for the most part.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,319
Location
Pennsylvania
The NFL and NBA are the 2 most hyped (highly paid) sports in the USA and both are black dominated with MUCH help from the Caste system which they then use a proof of black superiority. We want Whites to have an equal opportunity to compete and earn in theses sports which they would dominate if they're ever given an equal opportunity to compete again.

Nobody cares about sprinting in America for the most part.

Exactly. We know Whites can and should be dominating football and basketball, especially football. As far as the media is concerned, U.S. sports are the NFL, the NBA, then MLB, and everything else is secondary, unless of course a Magical Negro just happens to be winning in golf, tennis, hockey, or any other sport.

Maybe you have to live here to understand, but we're fully aware that Whites are far and away the world's dominant athletes, that's why Caste Football exists. :icon_wink:
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
As far as the media is concerned, U.S. sports are the NFL, the NBA, then MLB, and everything else is secondary, unless of course a Magical Negro just happens to be winning in golf, tennis, hockey, or any other sport.


You say it all there .........it doesn't matter if whites will dominate the NFL again, the media will ignore it (ala HW boxing now) and focus on whatever Negroes do good, even if that is bowling. Their problem is the white man, not the NFL or the NBA.

Where I disagree with you guys, is that the NFL and NBA are major sports and the rest are secondary, this is where you white Americans should approach reality differently.

MLS, MLB, NHL, Tennis, Golf, NASCAR, UFC, even Rodeo, horse racing and WWE produce MILLIONAIRES who are mostly white brothers, all these sports attract big crowds and are televised, isn't that major? It's us who should define what's major, not "them".

As for the NFL, again from my point of view, it's white dominated in many ways too.

If i am not mistaken a good 65-70% of the MVP awards in the regular season and Super Bowl have been white men, 12 to 15 highest selling jerseys if I am not mistaken belong to white men, the three most prestigious "players" in the game belong to white men, QB-Head Coach - Owner..........in a sport that Negroes make 65-70% of the league, it looks like all the big stars are white, now that's dominance to me. Also most #1 drafts in history have been white men as well right?

USA is a very capitalist country, a nation of the opportunity, so when USA gives the chance to millions of good looking, smart and educated white kids to become actors, models, lawyers, doctors, businessmen, architects etc and make millions of $ through the years, why should they become obese like the 95% of the defensive black players in the NFL, to enter the league for 4-5 years, ending up being broke bums like the vast majority of the Negroes?

White men dominate what matters and in the NFL in my opinion, if you are not a QB or a Head Coach, rest don't matter much, especially these low paid, "anonymous" defensive players who look like obese dark monsters.........Why Brad Pitt or Undertaker would go for that, when they can make millions for over 20 years, by doing other, more prestigious things?


Also when it comes to the NBA, yes I agree, that's a major league now worldwide and the lack of white Americans is sickening, but let's not forget that the second most popular and highest paid league of the world that my Greek peeps dominate pretty much every year, the EuroLeague (which produces more millionaires than the NBA) is 80% white, also International FIBA tournaments are vastly white dominated teams too.

By the way, will we open a thread for Olympics 2012 to count medals in all sports by race globally and countries like USA, UK and France? That would be fun!
 
Last edited:

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
Oh yes, also to add one more thing. I fully understand your point of view in here guys and your frustration, I mean you live in the country where they seek more racial diversity even in something sacred, where skill, manhood and courage should be the only criteria, the Navy Seals.........when I did read that article I ended up crying from laughter, as a former Navy Seal myself, who trained with American seals, I fully realize that the anti-white agenda in the US has reached incredible heights, but oh well I try to be optimistic and show you an alternative way to see things, because reality is that some things in the US and England are really depressive. Keep your head up guys!

PS
I can't wait to see Negroes as Navy Seals,that will be like a comedy, but not with a happy end for the Negroes, sure thing LOL
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
"Wasn't golf a boring, nonathletic, no good blah blah sport for 150 years, but the day a Negro started being a dominant figure in it, he became the richest, the "baddest", the athlete of the athletes and so on? If we did not focus so much on what our people don't dominate (very few indeed) but focused on all WE DOMINATE, then they would not have so much power against us. Just my opinion."

That "athlete" just won the Memorial Tournament. Undeniably, he did have some spectacular shots.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
That "athlete" just won the Memorial Tournament. Undeniably, he did have some spectacular shots.

Crapola! Here comes the media proclaiming the return of their messiah, again. Ugh!
 

Zeus

Guru
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
453
Location
In my world
"Wasn't golf a boring, nonathletic, no good blah blah sport for 150 years, but the day a Negro started being a dominant figure in it, he became the richest, the "baddest", the athlete of the athletes and so on? If we did not focus so much on what our people don't dominate (very few indeed) but focused on all WE DOMINATE, then they would not have so much power against us. Just my opinion."

That "athlete" just won the Memorial Tournament. Undeniably, he did have some spectacular shots.

Alright, the media can say whatever they like, a simple look on the facts make them look even more pathetic :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_golfers_with_most_PGA_Tour_wins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_major_championships_winning_golfers

99,9% of the all time greats are our guys and there's a couple of mutants (not even fully blacks) but they want to convince us that they "dominate" golf ? Sweet..........Maybe some emasculated white brothers fall for such propaganda, I personally don't :)
 
Top